Kimberly Wyatt Critical Reasoning Consistency and inconsistency Flipflop Waffle Flakey Consider new information Change your own mind Is it simply pandering Consistent Individual claims ID: 357742
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Formal fallacies and fallacies of langua..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Formal fallacies and fallacies of language
Kimberly Wyatt – Critical ReasoningSlide2
Consistency and inconsistency
Flip-flop
Waffle
Flakey
Consider new information
Change your own mind
Is it simply pandering?Slide3
Consistent Individual claims
It is consistent if it is at least
possible
for it to be truee.g. “Read my lips, no new taxes”Slide4
Inconsistent individual claims
If it simply cannot be true, then the claim is inconsistent.
e.g. It was raining on my window today, but not
raining
raining
.Slide5
Consistency of a person
Remember that because a
person
has been inconsistent, it does not speak to their position
on matters.
We like to believe that if a person is inconsistent, so are their positions on important things. This is a fallacy. We must judge on the
merits
of their position. Otherwise it is the
argumentum ad hominem
. Judging the argument “by the man” not the actual argument.Slide6
Miscalculating probabilities
One independent event
cannot
affect the outcome of another.
As an example, since a die (dice) has 6 sides, you would multiply 1/6 times 1/6 to get a 1 in 36 chance of getting 2 snake eye rolls. Not 2 in 6 as some assume.Slide7
Gambler’s fallacy
A fallacy wherein the speaker doesn’t realize that independent events are truly
independent
e.g. Separate coin flips have nothing to do with each other.Slide8
Overlooking prior probabilities
A fallacy wherein we overlook something in a probability that everything else being equal, is it’s prior probability.
e.g. Not taking into account all the things that can change our probabilities outcome.Slide9
Overlooking false positives
This is a fallacy in calculating the probability of something occurring.
Taking a seemingly large sample that in reality isn’t that large and using bad math to come to completely wrong conclusions.