PPT-Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12-digit HUC Priority

Presented by Naresh Pai PI Dharmendra Saraswat Collaborator Mike Daniels ANRC 2012 NPS Project Review Meeting Sept 27 Cooperative Extension Service Objective ANRC 2012 NPS Project Review Meeting Sept 27. Motivation. Effect of water on landscape:. Whereas hydrologists are mostly concerned with the movement of water, a common task is to assess the impact of water flow on the transport of materials – sediment and solutes. Robert Budd, PhD. January 20. th. , 2015. DPR Monitoring Sites. Northern California. Southern California . Salt Creek Watershed . Prioritization Model. Based on use and available toxicity data. Used to prioritize pesticides for monitoring purposes. Exercise . 4 Overview . Online Watershed Delineation and Data Retrieval. Hydrologic Terrain Analysis. Network Analysis. The Starting Point. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/inventory?agency_code=USGS&site_no=10109000. Brian Schwebke, P.E., NRCS NM State Conservation Engineer. Construction of NRCS Watershed Dams. Authorization for the construction of the dams came from:. Public Law 78-534 (Flood Control Act of 1944) and. By: Nick . Sisco. Objectives. Delineate streams and tributaries . D. elineate watersheds. Create streamlined process for future analysis. Map outfalls remotely to compare with GPS . data. Compare watershed boundaries. Nash Mock. Location & Background. Located between Tarrant and Denton counties in North Texas. Constructed following the Rivers & Harbors Act of 1945. Built 1948-1952 by the Army Corps of Engineers. Aspen Navarro, . Project Manager. , . GIS Analyst. Michael Jones, . Assistant Project Manager, GIS Analyst . William Perry, . Project Designer, GIS Analyst. Outline. Purpose. Scope. Revised Timeline. RiskMAP in Oklahoma. Gavin Brady, CFM, State NFIP . Coordinator. Janet K. Meshek, PE, CFM. OWRB - Cooperating Technical Partner. OWRB’s CTP PROGRAM TIMELINE. 2002. BECAME A CTP. 2002-2010. MMMS. DUTIES FOR MAP MOD. = area of land that drains precipitation to a body of water. 2. Depends on . topography. - Divided by ridges (hills) .  drainage divides. Video. Video 2. 3. Drainage Divide. One watershed on one side of hill. March 2014. Senate Concurrent Resolution 39 of the 2013 Regular Legislative Session – Phase I Study. The Current Landscape. 28. 131. 110. 6. 1. Levee/Flood Districts. 49. Drainage Districts. Water Districts. Prior Knowledge Check. Evaluate:. 10 x 7 =. 3 x 9 = . 5 x 8 = . 6 x 2 = . 7 x 4 = . Work out. 1) 3 x 90 =. 2) 6 x 70. 3) 2 x 80. 4) 60 x 4. 5) 80 x 5 . What does:. The 8 in 82 represent?. The 4 in 47 represent?. NINE - ELEMENT NONPOINT SOURCE STRATEGIC PLAN BEALS RUN - INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED HUC 12 ( 50800020803 ) PREPARED FOR THREE VALLEY CONSERVATION TRUST PREPARED BY ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS AQ VERSION 1. 3. . . 5. . 4. . 6. 546 ÷ 3 . 2. Year 5. Use short division to divide 3-digit numbers by 1-digit numbers.. We are going to move a sticky note along to hide and reveal each column in turn.. 3 . . Forecasting & Trends Office. Florida Department of Transportation. 1. Agenda. Introduction. Model Overview . Florida Standard Model (FSUTMS). Development & Review of Traffic Analysis Zone Data.