PPT-Evaluating decadal hindcasts: why and how?

Chris Ferro University of Exeter T Fricker F Otto D Stephenson E Suckling CliMathNet Conference 3 July 2013 Exeter UK Evaluating decadal hindcasts why and how. In evaluating the relevance of a programme or a project it is useful to consider the following questions To what extent are the objectives of the programme still valid Are the activities and outputs of the programme consistent with the overall goal by Paul E. Briggs Evaluating the wool or fleece on the live animal is very difficult for many people. Most of us are used to looking at shorn fleeces with the flesh side out, compared to the weathere . Speaker/ Pei-Ning Kirsten Feng. Advisor/ Yu-Heng Tseng. Outline . Overview. Motivation . Objective. Data and Model. Ongoing / Future . work. Summary . North Pacific Decadal Variations. [. Di Lorenzo et al.,2008; Bond et al., 2003. Adam Crymble. Plan for Today. Background . lecture. Discussion of experience with digital archives. Workshop: evaluating a historical website. Time to start drafting blog post. Terminology. Archive. Evaluating Sources. . WITNESSING. AND . EVANGELISM. Lesson 12 for June 23, 2012.  . The . Bible shows that we must evaluate (examine) ourselves, the Church members and the Church itself. Why is this evaluation necessary. Two-Way . Land/Atmosphere/Ocean . I. nteractions. Yongkang Xue. 1. , F. De Sales, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, . Y. Liu. , H.-Y. Ma. , L. Marx, M. Ek, R. Yang, J.-W. Lee. 1. University of California, Los Angels . Can decadal prediction anticipate events such as the warming hiatus?. Danny Barandiaran, Shih-Yu Wang. Utah State University. The “warming hiatus”. r. 2. < 0?. No slowdown in increase of ocean heat content. P. . J. Young. , V. . Naik. , J. . Brandt, R. Doherty, A. M. Fiore, . A . Gaudel. , C. . . Geels. , M. I. . Hegglin. , L. Hu, U. . Im. , R. Kumar, M. Lin, A. . Luhar. , L. Murray, . J. . Neu. , D. . . Interannual. -to-Decadal Predictions Experiments.  . L. Goddard. , on behalf of the . US CLIVAR Decadal Predictability Working Group & Collaborators. : . Lisa Goddard, . Arun. Kumar, Amy Solomon, James Carton, Clara . Daniel N. Baker. Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics. CU-Boulder. e. GY. Declaration. . We have a shared responsibility to create and implement strategies to realize the full potential of digital information for present and future generations. In the 21. Overview. What is science?. Science vs. pseudoscience. Scientific . method and . critique. How do we generate research ideas?. Ideas from theory. Ideas from other sources. How do we evaluate research ideas?. annual. . meeting. . 2013, . Trieste. Predictability of North Atlantic . subpolar. gyre strength with focus on the mid-1990s weakening. Katja. . Lohmann. , Daniela . Matei. , . Johann . Jungclaus. A community-driven initiative to harmonize data practices, research priorities and infrastructure for 2025. Carol B. Meyer. Foundation for Earth Science. September 23, 2013. Overview. 1. About . ESIP. Kuroshio. Extension . System . B. Qiu. 1. , S. Chen. 1. , N. Schneider. 1. and B. Taguchi. 2. 1. Dept of Oceanography, University of Hawaii, USA. 2. Earth Simulator Center, JAMSTEC, Japan. Climate Implications of Frontal Scale Air-Sea Interaction Workshop, Boulder, 5-7 August .