/
Market Efficiency and  Performance Evaluation Market Efficiency and  Performance Evaluation

Market Efficiency and Performance Evaluation - PowerPoint Presentation

marina-yarberry
marina-yarberry . @marina-yarberry
Follow
383 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-19

Market Efficiency and Performance Evaluation - PPT Presentation

Global Financial Management Campbell R Harvey Fuqua School of Business Duke University charveymaildukeedu httpwwwdukeeducharvey Overview Market Efficiency Theory of efficient markets ID: 656788

performance market fund information market performance information fund prices price form markets efficiency strong mutual ability implications evidence tests returns stock funds

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Market Efficiency and Performance Evalu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Market Efficiency and

Performance Evaluation

Global Financial Management

Campbell R. Harvey

Fuqua School of Business

Duke University

charvey@mail.duke.edu

http://www.duke.edu/~charveySlide2

Overview

Market Efficiency

Theory of efficient markets

Types of market efficiency

Evidence

Implications

Measuring Mutual Fund Performance

Performance measuresSlide3

The Net Present Value Rule

Investment

Projects

Primary

Market

Secondary

Market

NPV of

project

NPV of

financing

NPV of share

purchase

PV cash

inflows

Money

raised

Value of

shares

Initial

Investment

Value of

liability

Price of

shares

=

=

=

-

-

-

Competitive

Advantage

Competition

in Capital Markets

NPV of projects can be positive

NPV of transactions is zero

Prices are "fair"Slide4

Three Forms of Market Efficiency

Prices reflect all

information from

past prices

Prices reflect all

publicly available

information

Prices reflect all

relevant available

information

Technical Analysis

is valueless

Fundamental

Analysis isunprofitable

Insider Tradingis unprofitableWeak FormSemi-strong FormStrong FormSlide5

Weak Form Efficiency: Tests

A market is weak form efficient if current prices

reflect all information contained in past prices

and price movements.

Implications

Past prices cannot predict price movements in the future.

Trading rules based on technical analysis cannot yield superior returns.

Tests

Tests of correlation of prices.

Tests of trading rules.Slide6

Head and Shoulders Pattern

Stock

Price

TimeSlide7

Bollinger Bands

12/31

02/19

04/09

05/29

07/18

09/06

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

110

Price ($)

IBM Bollinger BandsSlide8

Studies on the Correlation of Markets

Elton/Gruber, 15.2, p. 409Slide9

Weak Form: Summary

Evidence in favor

Implications:

Technical rules are useless.

If the price of a stock has just gone up or down, then it does not follow that it will go up or down in the future.

Reason:

If technical rules worked, everyone would use them. As a result

they would not work anymore.

This does

not

imply:Prices are “uncaused”.Markets do not behave according to rules.Investors are incompetent.Slide10

Semi-Strong Form Efficiency

A market is semi-strong form efficient if all

publicly available information is reflected in market prices.

Implications:

Market reacts to information about companies

fundamentals

Macroeconomic news.

News on earnings.

Price adjustments are fast and appropriate: no systematic under/overshooting after announcement.

Tests:

Event studies of price reactions to news announcements.Tests of asset pricing modelsJoint hypothesis problemSlide11

Semi-Strong Form Evidence

Event Studies

Earnings announcements.

Dividend announcements.

Leading indicators.

Stock splits.

Accounting changes.

Mergers and acquisitions.

Corporate reconstructions.

Block sales.

Rights issues.

Share tips.Slide12

Macroeconomic Announcements

Time Content of Annoucement

9.15 am Industrial Production

Capacity Utilization

10.00 am Business Inventories

Construction Spending

Factory Inventories NAPM Survey

New Single-Family Home Sales

Personal Income

2.00 pm Federal Budget

no fixed time: Instalment Credit

Time Content of Annoucement8.30 am Consumer Price Index Durable Goods Orders Employment Gross National Product Housing Starts Merchandise Trade Deficit Leading Indicators Producer Price Index Retail SalesSlide13

Reaction to Macroeconomic Announcements

Question

How quickly do markets absorb information? Is the reaction appropriate?

Method

Investigate reaction of futures markets on Treasury bonds, dollar and deutche marks traded on CBOT and CME.

Results

Almost all the price adjustment takes place in the first minute after the announcement (eg for

CPI between 8.30 and 8.31.

Later adjustments cannot be predicted from earlier reactions

No systematic over or underreaction;

No profitable trading on news.Slide14

Semi-Strong Form Conclusions

Evidence

Unbiased evaluation by investors.

Pre-announcement information leakage.

Rapid adjustment to new information.

Implications

Fundamental analysis is valueless

Unless it is original, or it incorporates private information.

Check if price has already moved

If not, must be able to act fast!Slide15

Strong Form Efficiency

A market is strong form efficient if all relevant information

(public or private) is reflected in market prices.

Implications:

Analysts

knowledge doesn

t help.

No profits from insider trading.

Tests:

Profitability of trading on inside information.Performance of fund managers.Slide16

Strong Form Evidence

Fund managers

peformance:

Mutual funds

Pension funds

Specialists and insiders

Market makers

Corporate officers

Analysts

skillsAdvisory servicesInternal researchTransactions analysisAnalyze mutual fund performanceImplications for semi-strong form efficiencySlide17

Mutual Fund Styles

Aggressive Growth

Growth

Growth-Income

Income-Growth

Balanced

IncomeSlide18

Style and Beta RiskSlide19

Style and VolatilitySlide20

Style and Average ReturnsSlide21

Jensen

s Alpha

From the CAPM:

Any expectation can be written as a realized value plus a shock:

Check intercept of the regression model:

If fund managers have no additional information we should have:Slide22

Measuring Mutual Fund Performance

Return

of Fund

Beta

1.0Slide23

Historical Performance of Mutual FundsSlide24

Distribution of AlphasSlide25

Distribution of t-StatisticsSlide26

Portfolio Manager Ability

Stock Picking

Stock-picking ability:

Can the manager identify which stocks

will outperform the market or the industry?Slide27

Portfolio Manager Ability

Market-Timing

Market-timing ability:

Can the manager identify turning points between bull and bear markets?Slide28

Perfect Market-Timing AbilitySlide29

Sharpe Ratios

Idea: use the Capital Market Line

If markets are efficient

and

CAPM holds, return/risk ratio should be the same for all assets

The

Sharpe Ratio

is the ratio of excess returns to volatility:

Compare the Sharpe Ratio for a particular fund to that of the market (or appropriate benchmark):Slide30

Ex-Post Sharpe RatiosSlide31

The Treynor Measure

Idea: use the security market line:

If markets are efficient

and

CAPM holds, all assets should lie on SML

The

Treynor Measure

is the ratio of excess returns to systematic risk:

Compare the Yreynor Measure for a particular fund to that of the market (or appropriate benchmark):Slide32

b

i

E[r

i

]

SML

r

f

ABC

XYZ

M

Ex post Treynor index

higher than the market

Ex post Treynor index

lower than the market

The Treynor MeasureSlide33

Graham-Harvey Measures

Create a portfolio of S&P500 futures contracts and a money market account that matches the volatility of the particular mutual fund.

Lever the mutual fund volatility to match the S&P500 futures volatility by borrowing or lending.

In each case, compare the returns of the two portfolios. Slide34

Graham-Harvey MeasureSlide35

Mutual Fund Performance:

New Evidence

Issue

Investigate forecasting ability of individual managers:

hot

hands and

icy

hands in stock picking.TestDoes the past performance of a fund predict its future performance: correlation between returns.Results Underperformance is more persistent than outperformance of the market.Past return data help to predict the future relative performance of the fund.Even funds with “hot hands” do only marginally better than the market.Conclusion Invest in index funds, not in actively managed funds.Source: Hendricks et. al. (1993)Slide36

Performance PersistenceSlide37

Investment Newsletter Performance

Graham and Harvey (1995) study the performance of recommendations of 200 investment newsletters.

Given the evidence on market efficiency, what should we expect?

Even if the newsletter writers have inside information - should we expect to make money by following their recommendations? Slide38

Performance of All NewslettersSlide39

Performance of Long-Lived NewslettersSlide40

Ability to Time Bull Markets

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%20%

Percent of letters which increased weights in each month

Performance of Newsletter Strategies

Graham and Harvey (1995)

Fitted Regression

Line

Monthly S&P500

ReturnSlide41

Ability to Time Bear MarketsSlide42

Implications of Market Efficiency

There Are No Money Machines

Hence:

Don

t pay a premium for acquisitions unless you can add value.

Don

t use the capital structure to speculate on market movements:

international borrowing to speculate on currencies.

Debt structure, swaps, and timing to speculate on interest rates.

Don’t manipulate accounts to boost earnings.Slide43

Implications of Market Efficiency

Trust Market Prices

Hence:

Treat market prices as values; assume price changes reflect information or the value of management actions.

Use the market

s free forecasts

to value projects using market currency and interest rate forecasts.