20052010 752012 ViceRector Johanna Björkroth 7 May 2012 1 752012 2 Osasto Henkilön nimi Esityksen nimi Outline Role of Steering group Risk taking endeavour Evaluation aspects ID: 785766
Download The PPT/PDF document "Excellence for society International eva..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Excellence for societyInternational evaluation of research and doctoral TRAINING at the University of Helsinki2005-2010
7.5.2012
Vice-Rector Johanna Björkroth7 May 2012
1
Slide27.5.20122Osasto / Henkilön nimi / Esityksen nimi
Outline
Role of Steering group
Risk taking endeavour
Evaluation aspects
Success of RCs in evaluation
Rewards
Slide3Steering group (2010-2012) and its roleVice-Rector Johanna Björkroth (pj)
Professor Marja Airaksinen
(vpj)Chief information specialist Maria ForsmanProfessor Arto MustajokiUniv. lecturer
Kirsi
Pyhältö
Director, Academic Affairs
Ossi
Tuomi
Doctoral candidate
Jussi
Vauhkonen
Slide4Some critical questions discussedParticipation categoriesResearcher Community – in evaluation – in futureVoluntary participationPerformance profiles related to success and rewarding Usefulness of data and reportsBibliometrics
Societal impact
Slide5Evaluation aspects in Panels’ feedbackScientific quality Scientific significance
Societal impact
Processes of leadership and managementCollaborationInnovativeness
Future significance
Slide6Material given to the PanelsE-formsList of publications (TUHAT)List of other scientific activities (TUHAT)CWTS/Leiden bibliometric
analyses RCsEntire University
HULib bibliometric analyses for the RCsDoctoral SurveyBackground informationStatistics about the UH and the Finnish HE
Slide77.5.20127Participating Researcher Communities(page161)
Slide8Mean of scores (1-5) 3.96Natural Sciences 4.16Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs 4.02Humanities 4.02Medicine, Biomed and Health Scs 4.00Social Scs 3.72 (Page 168)
7.5.2012
8Quality and focus of research
Slide9Mean of scores (1-5) 4.02Humanities 4.30Medicine, biomed and Health Scs 4.09Natural Scs 4.02Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs 3.88Social Scs 3.86 (Page 168)
7.5.2012
9Doctoral training
Slide10Mean of scores (1-5) 4.03Humanities 4.18Medicine, biomed and Health. Scs 4.17Biological, Agr. and Vet Scs 4.02Social Scs 3.94Natural Scs 3.82
(Page 168)
7.5.201210Societal impact
Slide11Mean of scores (1-5) 4.08Medicine, biomed and Health Scs 4.22Natural Scs 4.09Social Scs 4.08Humanities 4.07Biological, Agr. and Vet. Scs 3.93
(Page 168)
7.5.201211Collaboration
Slide127.5.201212
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Biological, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
(page 67)
Slide137.5.201213
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Medicine, Biomedicine and Health Sciences
(page84)
Slide147.5.201214
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Natural Sciences (page 105)
Slide157.5.201215
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Humanities (page125)
Slide167.5.201216
Distributions of numeric evaluation – Panel:
Social Sciences (page146)
Slide17Total 10.47 million euro – division based on the performance of research and doctoral trainingRewards will be addressed according to the numerical scores of RCs in participation categoriesThe highest 30 percent in each category will be rewardedScore level of success is unique in each categoryAmount of reward will be determined according to the number of PIs in successful RCsThe success criteria is determined by the first four evaluation questions
7.5.2012
17Monetary rewards for the years 2013 - 2016
Slide187.5.201218Category 1: Cutting edge (page 345)
Slide197.5.201219Category 2: Close to Cutting Edge (page 346)
Slide207.5.201220Category 3: Exceptional(page 346)
Slide217.5.201221Category 4: Innovative opening (page 347)
Slide227.5.201222Category 5: Societal impact (page 347)
Slide23MORE – HelsinkiHas been noted by other universitiesProduced a valuable set of dataInitiated discussion about collaboration
Produced first time
bibliometric raports 7.5.201223
Conclusion
Slide24Thank
you
All reports
are
available
in
electronic
form
:
http://www.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/halvin_julkaisut.shtml
University-level
paperback
report
can
be
ordered
:
https://elomake.helsinki.fi/lomakkeet/35495/lomake.html