PPT-Contesting on VHF and Above

Jim Lommen KC7QY Socorro NM DM64 1 Outline        Why contest       VHF Awards VUCC WAS DXCC etc       Major VHF Contests       Entry level contest categories Single band 3 Band FM Only All Band Rover. orguk Terms and expressions we use We use must when we refer to a specific legal or regulatory require ent We use should for items we consider to be minimum good practice but which are not legal requirements You do not have to follow this guidance bu Karin . Doolan. , Department of Sociology, University of . Zadar. UNIKE Workshop 3: Policy Travel, Ljubljana, 7-11 July 2014. The student activist as policy analyst. „academic researcher, the doctoral student, the policy bureaucrat, the commissioned researcher, the freelance analyst for hire, the consultant researcher, the policy entrepreneur” . GENERAL ELECTIONS TO LOK SABHA 2014 C.NO. NAME & ADDRESS OF THE CANDIDATE AGE/SEX PARTY AFFILIATION S.NO. SYMBOL ALLOTTED 1 - Chandini Chowk ASHUTOSH 48 / M AAM AADMI PARTY 1 1 83B, BLOCK B, EXPRESS Randy Thompson, K5ZD. Discuss factors important to creating winning scores. Discuss how to avoid score reductions. Use CQWW Contest as real-world example. Purpose of this Session. Select category. All band or single band?. Contesting the RIGHT Way. Randy Thompson, K5ZD. Discussion of what ethical behavior is in radio contesting. Understand the impact of unethical behavior. Encourage participants to take ownership of their own behavior and encourage others to do the same . ffice of theCourt,along with a logement's decision.Issu퀀 Once the decision has been registered and the required courtclerkwillissue a writofexecution, which is a formal order from the Court. Co FOR CONTESTING THE GENERAL & REGIONAL ELECTIONS – 2015 GECOM’s Media Centre (Returning Officer’s Building) 73 High Street, Georgetown April 29, 2015 CODE OF CONDUCT FOR POLITICAL Contesting Cyberspace and the Coming Crisis of Authority 33 ning as an effort by a state including including Fair Play – How to Earn and Keep Respect. , K4RO. Discussion of what ethical behavior is in radio contesting. Purpose of this Session. Discussion of what ethical behavior is in radio contesting. Understand the impact of unethical behavior, and some of the motivations behind it . Randy Thompson, K5ZD. Discuss factors important to creating winning scores. Discuss how to avoid score reductions. Use CQWW Contest as real-world example. Purpose of this Session. Select category. All band or single band?. Let’s Make Contesting Fun!. Your Instructors. Jeffrey Bail - NT1K - Main Interest In Amateur Radio is contesting. First “contest” was Field Day in 1995. Mostly active during contests, Field Day and DXpeds. Part of multi operator, multi radio events.. Randy Thompson, K5ZD. Discussion of what ethical behavior is in radio contesting. Understand the impact of unethical behavior. Encourage participants to take ownership of their own behavior and encourage others to do the same . Since the late 1970s human remains in museum collections have been subject to claims and controversies, such as demands for repatriation by indigenous groups who suffered under colonization. These requests have been strongly contested by scientists who research the material and consider it unique evidence.This book charts the influences at play on the contestation over human remains and examines the construction of this problem from a cultural perspective. It shows that claims on dead bodies are not confined to once colonized groups. A group of British Pagans, Honouring the Ancient Dead, formed to make claims on skeletons from the British Isles, and ancient human remains, bog bodies and Egyptian mummies, which have not been requested by any group, have become the focus of campaigns initiated by members of the profession, at times removed from display in the name of respect.By drawing on empirical research including extensive interviews with the claims-making groups, ethnographic work, document, media, and policy analysis, Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections demonstrates that strong internal influences do in fact exist. The only book to examine the construction of contestation over human remains from a sociological perspective, it advances an emerging area of academic research, setting the terms of debate, synthesizing disparate ideas, and making sense of a broader cultural focus on dead bodies in the contemporary period. When sociologist Georgiann Davis was a teenager, her doctors discovered that she possessed XY chromosomes, marking her as intersex. Rather than share this information with her, they withheld the diagnosis in order to “protect” the development of her gender identity it was years before Davis would see her own medical records as an adult and learn the truth. Davis’ experience is not unusual. Many intersex people feel isolated from one another and violated by medical practices that support conventional notions of the male/female sex binary which have historically led to secrecy and shame about being intersex. Yet, the rise of intersex activism and visibility in the US has called into question the practice of classifying intersex as an abnormality, rather than as a mere biological variation. This shift in thinking has the potential to transform entrenched intersex medical treatment.In Contesting Intersex, Davis draws on interviews with intersex people, their parents, and medical experts to explore the oft-questioned views on intersex in medical and activist communities, as well as the evolution of thought in regards to intersex visibility and transparency. She finds that framing intersex as an abnormality is harmful and can alter the course of one’s life. In fact, controversy over this framing continues, as intersex has been renamed a ‘disorder of sex development’ throughout medicine. This happened, she suggests, as a means for doctors to reassert their authority over the intersex body in the face of increasing intersex activism in the 1990s and feminist critiques of intersex medical treatment. Davis argues the renaming of ‘intersex’ as a ‘disorder of sex development’ is strong evidence that the intersex diagnosis is dubious. Within the intersex community, though, disorder of sex development terminology is hotly disputed some prefer not to use a term which pathologizes their bodies, while others prefer to think of intersex in scientific terms. Although terminology is currently a source of tension within the movement, Davis hopes intersex activists and their allies can come together to improve the lives of intersex people, their families, and future generations. However, for this to happen, the intersex diagnosis, as well as sex, gender, and sexuality, needs to be understood as socially constructed phenomena. A personal journey into medical and social activism, Contesting Intersex presents a unique perspective on how medical diagnoses can affect lives profoundly.