/
Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Thyroid Nodules Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Thyroid Nodules

Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Thyroid Nodules - PowerPoint Presentation

mitsue-stanley
mitsue-stanley . @mitsue-stanley
Follow
409 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-21

Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Thyroid Nodules - PPT Presentation

Shadows in the Dark Mark H Lewy MD Chief Medical Director Guardian Life Insurance Co Goals of this talk Understand the diagnostic modalities Plain Xray Mammography Ultrasound CT Computerized Tomography Imaging ID: 598080

breast cancer risk thyroid cancer breast thyroid risk follow benign imaging lung pulmonary nodules case screening doctor solitary chest

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Th..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Evaluation of Breast , Pulmonary, and Thyroid Nodules

Shadows in the Dark

Mark H. Lewy, M.D.Chief Medical DirectorGuardian Life Insurance Co.Slide2

Goals of this talk

Understand the diagnostic modalitiesPlain Xray

MammographyUltrasoundCT (Computerized Tomography) ImagingMRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)Fine needle aspiration biopsyUnderstand the Risk Classification Systems

BI-RADS Breast Imaging and Data System (Breast)

Fleischner

Society Recommendations (Lung)ACCP recommendations (Lung)Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology (Thyroid)Slide3

Case #1

57 yo female, applying for 750K. 5’6”, 164 lb.Regular breast cancer screening since age 35 because her mom had breast cancer and is currently alive at 79

yo. She has had 2 biopsies in the past due to suspicious lesions, both fibroadenomas. Neither she nor her mother were tested for BRCA mutations. No history of BCP use.Her most recent mammogram 2 months ago was read as BI-RADS 3- Probably benign.

What would you do?Slide4

Breast Cancer

It is the most commonly diagnosed life threatening cancer in women.It is the second leading cause of cancer death in women after lung cancer.Approximately 1 in 8 women will develop breast cancer over the course of their lifetime.

R. Swart, MD, Breast Cancer Screening, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1945498-overview Slide5

Mammography Screening Guidelines

American Cancer SocietyUS Preventative Services Task ForceAmerican College of RadiologyAmerican Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

National Comprehensive Care Network.Slide6

High Risk Screening

Family history, BRCA or other markersBasically start earlier with mammography and discuss risk reduction.Slide7

BI-RADS Classification

ASSESSMENT CATEGORIESCategory 0 / Need Additional Imaging Evaluation

Category 1 / Negative. Risk of malignancy 5 in 10,000Category 2 / Benign Finding . Risk 5 in 10,000

This is also a negative mammogram, but the interpreter may wish to describe a finding.

Involuting

, calcified fibroadenomas, multiple secretory calcifications, fat containing lesions such as oil cysts, lipomas, galactoceles, and mixed density hamartomas.Slide8

BI-RADS Classification

Category 3 / Probably Benign Finding - Short Interval Follow-Up Suggested. Risk <2%

A finding placed in this category should have a very high probability of being benign. It is not expected to change over the follow-up interval, but the radiologist would prefer to establish its stability.

Category 4 / Suspicious Abnormality - Biopsy Should Be

Considered. Risk 25-50%

These are lesions that do not have the characteristic morphologies of breast cancer but have a definite probability of being malignant. The radiologist has sufficient concern to urge a biopsy.Category 5 / Highly Suggestive of Malignancy - Appropriate Action Should Be Taken. Risk 75-99% These lesions have a high probability of being cancer

American College of Radiology. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Web site. Available at

http://www.acr.org

. Slide9
Slide10
Slide11
Slide12

Other breast cancer screening modalities

Ultrasound-Used as an adjunct to mammography and in diagnostic mammograms. No ionizing radiation.MRI- Used in high risk and the more dense breasts of younger

women. Also much better at detecting DCIS. Ct can also be used for these situations, but there are concerns for the increased radiation.Nuclear Imaging with technetium-99m- Not used for screening but is used in difficult or non-diagnostic cases.Tomosynthesis

- 3D breast imaging. Improved detection but double the radiation dose. Under further study.

Electrical

Impedance Imaging (T-scan)-measures electrical conduction in the breast. Approved adjunct to mammography.Slide13

Other breast cancer screening modalities

CT Laser Mammography-ExperimentalDuctal Lavage-breast cells from milk ductsThermography- no compelling evidence and currently not FDA approved

. Sensitivity significantly lower than mammography.Slide14

Case #1

57 yo female, applying for 750K. 5’6”, 164 lb.Regular breast cancer screening since age 35 because her mom had breast cancer and is currently alive at 79

yo. She has had 2 biopsies in the past due to suspicious lesions, both fibroadenomas. Neither she nor her mother were tested for BRCA mutations. No history of BCP use.Her most recent mammogram 2 months ago was read as BI-RADS 3- Probably benign.

What would you do?Slide15

Case #2

58 yo male, applying for $500K WL. He is married with 2 adult children. 5’9”, 223lb.June 2016,

he was complaining of some chest pain. EKG and nuclear stress test were negative for ischemia. Cardiac enzymes performed in the ED were negative. As part of the evaluation for a possible pulmonary embolus a 6 mm non calcified lesion was seen in the LUL. He had not had a previous CT and did not recall even a chest xray. The ER doctor told him to follow up with regular doctor for appropriate follow up.PMH- asthma x 5 years, uses an inhaler

SH-He has been a 1 pack per day

since he was 14Slide16

Case #2 continued

Exam- negativeJuly, 2016-he followed up with his doctor. He denied any chest pains and with the previous testing the doctor did not seem concerned. It is noted that the client was to quit smoking and lose weight.

Insurance exam was not illuminating. Labs were all normal except for cotinine in the urine.Slide17

Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

A solitary pulmonary nodule is defined as a discrete, well-marginated, rounded opacity less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter that is completely surrounded by lung parenchyma, does not touch the hilum or mediastinum, and is not associated with adenopathy,

atelectasis, or pleural effusion.Slide18

Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

These are the questions that clinicians and underwriters need to answer.Benign or malignant?Investigated or observed?Should it be

resected and/or biopsied?Survival rate of lung cancer is 14% at 5 yearsSlide19

Benign lung tumors

Hamartomas- mixed mature cells consisting of fat , cartilage, and muscle cells.Bronchial Adenomas- half of all benign tumorsMucous gland adenomas

Papillomas- usually arise from virusesHemangiomasSlide20

Malignant Lung Tumors

Bronchogenic carcinomaAdenocarcinomaSquamous cell carcinoma

Large cell lung cancerSmall cell lung cancerLymphomaMetastasesSlide21

Risk Factors

Factors that place the patient at high riskSMOKING, SMOKING, SMOKINGOccupational Risk or Exposure- asbestos, radon, nickel, polycyclic hydrocarbons, vinyl chloride

Factors that place the patient at low riskNot smokingSlide22

Imaging

Chest xray- not very useful with nodules less than 1 cm.CT scan- 3-4 mm size detection.PET scan- looks at metabolic activity, diagnostic accuracy, 80%

SPECT scanSlide23

Characteristics of lung nodules

Size- greater than 2 cm, 50% were malignantGrowth rate- doubling time of most cancers is 1-18 mo. Double in volume corresponds to 25% increase in diameter.

Presence of calcification- usually suggests benignancy.Border characteristics- smooth, well demarcated borders suggest benignancy.Internal characteristics

LocationSlide24

What should we accept in underwriting?

Fleischner Society RecommendationsLow riskLess than 4 mm- no further investigation

4-6 mm- CT scan at 12 months6-8 mm- 18 month follow up>8 mm- 24 month follow up 24 months follow up with enhanced scanning or biopsyHigh riskLess than 4 mm follow up at 12 months

4-6 mm- follow up to 24 months

6-8 mm follow up to 24 months

> 8 mm- follow up with enhanced scans or biopsy up to 24 months

Fleischner

Society Pulmonary Nodule Guidelines

. Radiology 2005; 237:395-400Slide25

ACCP recommendations for larger lesions >1 cm

Low risk- follow for 24 monthsIntermediate risk-PET scan or needle biopsy if amenableHigh risk- Surgical resectionSlide26

Lung Cancer ScreeningSlide27

Asif

Alavi

, MD, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2139920-overview Slide28

Asif

Alavi

, MD, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2139920-overview Slide29

Asif

Alavi

, MD, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2139920-overview Slide30

Case #2

58 yo male, applying for $500K WL. He is married with 2 adult children. 5’9”, 223lb.June, 2014, he was complaining of some chest pain. EKG and nuclear stress test were negative for ischemia. Cardiac enzymes performed in the ED were negative. As part of the evaluation for a possible pulmonary embolus a 6 mm non calcified lesion was seen in the LUL. He had not had a previous CT and did not recall even a chest

xray. The ER doctor told him to follow up with regular doctor for appropriate follow up.PMH- asthma x 5 years, uses an inhaler

SH-He has been a 1 pack per day life long smokerSlide31

Case #2 continued

Exam- negativeJuly, 2014-he followed up with his doctor. He denied any chest pains and with the previous testing the doctor did not seem concerned. It is noted that the client was to quit smoking and lose weight.Insurance exam was not illuminating. Labs were all normal except for cotinine in the urine.Slide32

Discussion

AgeSexConcernsRisk factorsRecommendations

Offer- preferred, standard, low substandard, high substandard, PP/declineSlide33

Case #2 continued

He runs out immediately after receiving our decision and gets the follow-up CT of the chest and the lesion remains unchanged and he is relieved.The agent calls you and thanks you profusely for being so thorough and finding this information that his doctor missed.The client was so excited that he wants to get an additional 500K now that he knows he is OK. He is also going to quit smoking because of you.

What do you offer now with this new info?Slide34

Case #3

A 49 yo female applied for $500K of term insurance. In May of 2016, s

he noticed a small lump on her trachea. She went to her primary care physician who ordered an ultrasound. The ultrasound revealed a 1.3 cm hypoechoic mass in her thyroid. Thyroid labs were noted to be normal. Thyroid radioiodine imaging showed a hot nodule. A fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended but not completed.Can we offer?Slide35

Solitary Thyroid Nodules

Thyroid nodular disorders affect about 5% of the US population.Approximately 5-20% of thyroid nodules are neoplasms.

Differentiating hyperplasia from neoplasm may be difficult.Differentiating benign neoplasm from malignant neoplasm may be difficult.Evaluation requires the cooperation of the PCP, endocrinologist, radiologist, pathologist, and surgeon.Slide36

Thyroid Nodular Disease

Nodular disease is more common in women.Nodules increase in frequency with age.Look for history of neck irradiation.

Benign lesions include adenomas, cysts, thyroiditis, and hyperplasia.Thyroid cancer accounts for 1 % of all new cancers diagnosed in the US.Malignant nodules are found more often in men than in women.Cancers include follicular, papillary,

medullary

,

Hurthle, sarcoma, and lymphoma.Slide37

Differential Diagnosis

Physical exam is for the most part not helpful.Solitary nodules: Most likely to be malignant in patients older than 60 years and in patients younger than 30 years Increased rate of malignancy in males

Nodular growth Rapid growth: Ominous sign Usually painless (nontender to palpation); sudden onset of pain more strongly associated with benign disease (eg

, hemorrhage into a benign cyst,

subacute

viral thyroiditis) Hard and fixed nodules Look for molecular genetic testing to become the diagnostic test of the not to distant future.Slide38

Differential Diagnosis- Imaging

UltrasonographyUltrasonography remains the most important imaging modality in the evaluation of thyroid cancer and should be used routinely to assess the primary tumor and all associated cervical lymph node basins preoperatively.

Ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes may be useful in guiding the extent of surgery Radionuclide StudiesHot vs. warm vs. cold nodules

CT and MRI

Mostly helpful in staging and invasion into surrounding tissue but not in the initial differentiation of malignancy and benignancySlide39

Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy(FNAB)

Test of choice due to accuracy, safety, and cost effectiveness. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are 83%, 92%, and 95%.Very good in papillary cancers.

Not so good in follicular and Hurthle cell cancers which are frequently returned as indeterminate.Treatment of choice is usually surgical excision or RAI-131.Slide40

Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

Risk of MalignancyBenign- <1% are malignant

Atypia- 5-10% are malignantFollicular neoplasm- 20-30% are malignantSuspicious for malignancy- 50-75% are malignantMalignant- 100%

Baloch

ZW, et al.

The: National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference: a summation.

Cytojournal

. 2008;5:6. doi:10.1186/1742-6413-5-6

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Specimens

Am J Clin Pathol

2010

134

:343-Slide41

Management

For atypia-Repeat FNAB in 3-6 months or surgical consultation for those at higher clinical risk.Follicular neoplasm- Should (almost) always be referred for surgical management.

Nondiagnostic due to inadequate sampling means nondiagnostic. The test needs to be repeated in order to proceed.Slide42

Radionuclide scan

Kahn, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/385301-overviewSlide43

Ultrasound

Kahn, http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/385301-overviewSlide44

Case #3

A 49 yo female applied for $500K of term insurance. In May of 2016, she noticed a small lump on her trachea. She went to her primary care physician who ordered an ultrasound. The ultrasound revealed a 1.3 cm hypoechoic

mass in her thyroid. Thyroid labs were noted to be normal. Thyroid radioiodine imaging showed a hot nodule. A fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) was recommended but not completed.Can we offer?Slide45

Case #3

A FNAB was performed and showed atypia. Repeat was suggested in 3-6 months.Now would you offer?