Rockwood School District Grading Policy adopted May 20 2010 ReTeachReassess When a student scores below proficient on standards essential to continued academic progress interventions designed to support student mastery of the standards will be implemented Reassessment will be provid ID: 498646
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Marquette’s journey toward Standards B..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Marquette’s journey toward Standards Based Grading and Best Grading PracticesSlide2
Rockwood School District Grading Policy (adopted May 20, 2010)
Re-Teach/Reassess:
When a student scores below proficient on
standards essential to continued academic progress,
interventions designed to support student mastery of the standard(s) will be implemented. Reassessment will be provided after a student has satisfactorily completed additional formative work. The most recent score will be recorded.Slide3
Extra Credit:Extra Credit is not appropriate in a standards-based system as grades must be accurate measures of achievement standards. Opportunities for re-teaching and reassessing shall be available.Slide4
Homework:Homework is an important part of teaching, learning, and parent involvement in the Rockwood School District. Student work should always receive feedback to further student learning.
Teachers will exclude homework from the course grade if it was assigned for pre-assessment or early learning guided practice.
Homework assigned as a summative assessment may be included in the course grade based on curriculum guidelines.Slide5
Late Work:Students are expected to submit school assignments in a timely manner. Late submissions will be recorded and reported as a non-academic indicator.Slide6
Participation/Active Engagement:
Performance requirements as listed in the curriculum document will be reported in the academic grade. All other measures of participation will be marked as non-academic indicators. Performance and participation provides an opportunity for students to develop, practice, and demonstrate knowledge and skills. Performance and participation can provide teachers the opportunity to monitor and assess knowledge and skills based on the standards for the course/subject.Slide7
What did this look like after 1 semester?
Homework
Reteach/Reasses
Extra Credit
Participation/Active
Engagement
Late Work
Academic Detention
Course
graded
recorded
proficiency set
allowed
max score
most recent score
formative work required
allowed
academic indicator
academic indicator
cut-off
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
%
summative
formative
all
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
yes
no
teacher
lunch
Theatre
x
x
x
70
x
X
X
x
x
X
Unit
x
AP Mus Theory
x
x
x
Unk
x
unk
x
x
x
x
Orchestras
x
x
x
75
Unk
x
unk
x
x
x
x
Vid Production
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unk
x
Pub Speaking
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unk
x
Band
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
World Lang
x
x
x
x
x
70
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unit
x
Beg Guitar
x
x
x
x
x
unk
x
x
x
Quarter
x
Adv Guitar
x
x
Unk
Unk
x
Unk
x
x
x
x
Unk
x
Vocal Music
x
x
x
85
x
x
x
x
x
x
1 week
x
Visual Art
x
x
x
70
x
x
x
x
x
x
1 week prior to end of quarter
x
Slide8
Second Semester Concerns:
Inconsistency creating confusion among students and parents and administrators
In late work natural deadlines
In use of academic detentions
In proficiency scores to reassess
In what is allowed to be reassessed Slide9
Second Semester Revisions Reteach / Reassess
Required:
--Reassessment items are defined by PLC (doesn’t have to be everything in the grade book); should be items that are “essential to continued academic progress”
-- Reassessment cannot be more difficult than the original exam
--All students
must
do formative work to be allowed to reassess. The amount and how it is graded/recorded (as a non-academic indicator) must be aligned by PLC
--Most recent score will be recorded
--No retakes on finalsSlide10
Recommended:
Reassessment
should be completed within one week of receiving exam back from teacher
Proficiency should be at 75%
or above
—we want to set high expectations for our students. If they want to do more formative work, study harder, and prove to us they have mastered the material we should allow them. The reason for 75% is that it is “average” we want our students to be above average—high expectations are our norm
Homework can be used as a prerequisite to reassessment. We believe that we can shift accountability to students if we mandate that the students have completed homework prior to the first assessment in order to be allowed to re-assess. They must put forward a “good faith effort” without being accountable on accuracy since homework is practice. Homework should be recorded as a non academic indicator and be graded on completion.
80% completed by first exam to be allowed to reassess
100% completed PLUS additional formative work prior to reassessment Slide11
Homework:
Recommended:
1. Use as non-academic indicator and report in IC (0% category) to show student
effort/progress.
2. Use Academic Detentions for missing work as this encourages
timeliness.
3. Use Homework as a requirement for student reassessment.
4. Homework can be entered as an academic indicator (used as formative assessment) if it isn’t
a
first attempt at the work and it is used as an evaluation of
knowledge.Slide12
Late Work
Recommended:
1. Must be turned in by unit exam/final summative assessment or natural deadline
2. Will become a 0 if after exam/natural deadlineSlide13
Current Challenges
We are still trying to define what are the standards required for “continued academic success”.
How are we holding students accountable and reporting that on a report card?
How are we continuing to communicate our policy and practices to parents and students?Slide14
Current Successes:
D/F data has dropped in the last year
For the class of 2015 there was
25% reduction in F’s from last year
8% reduction
in D’s
A focus of high expectations on student learning has evolved and affected the culture. We now have many more conversations about student learning than ever before. Slide15
Jennifer Seboldseboldjennifer@rockwood.k12.mo.us