/
Multiple testing Multiple testing

Multiple testing - PowerPoint Presentation

mitsue-stanley
mitsue-stanley . @mitsue-stanley
Follow
416 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-04

Multiple testing - PPT Presentation

Justin Chumbley Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research University of Zurich With many thanks for slides amp images to FIL Methods group Detect an effect of unknown extent amp location ID: 484578

contrast ofestimatedparameters voxel error ofestimatedparameters contrast error voxel varianceestimate volume threshold decision single activation extent multiple statistical image space

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Multiple testing" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Multiple testing

Justin ChumbleyLaboratory for Social and Neural Systems ResearchUniversity of Zurich

With many thanks for slides & images to:

FIL Methods groupSlide2

Detect an effect of unknown extent & location

Realignment

Smoothing

Normalisation

General linear model

Statistical parametric map (SPM)

Image time-series

Parameter estimates

Design matrix

Template

Kernel

Voluminous

Dependent

p <0.05

Statistical

inferenceSlide3

t

=

contrast ofestimatedparametersvarianceestimate

t

Error at

a single voxelSlide4

H

0 ,

H1: zero/non-zero activationt = contrast ofestimatedparameters

variance

estimate

t

Error at

a single voxelSlide5

Decision:

H0 ,

H1: zero/non-zero activationt = contrast ofestimatedparameters

variance

estimate

t

h

Error at

a single voxelSlide6

Decision:

H0 ,

H1: zero/non-zero activationt = contrast ofestimatedparameters

variance

estimate

t

h

Error at

a single voxelSlide7

Decision:

H0 ,

H1: zero/non-zero activationt = contrast ofestimatedparameters

variance

estimate

t

h

Error at

a single voxelSlide8

Decision:

H0 ,

H1: zero/non-zero activationt = contrast ofestimatedparameters

variance

estimate

t

h

Decision rule (threshold)

h

,

determines related error rates

,

Convention: Penalize complexity

Choose

h

to give acceptable under

H

0

Error at

a single voxelSlide9

Types of error

Reality

H

1

H

0

H

0

H

1

True

negative (TN

)

True positive (TP

)

False positive (FP)

False negative (FN)

specificity:

1-

= TN / (TN + FP)

= proportion of actual negatives which are correctly identified

sensitivity (power): 1-

= TP / (TP + FN)= proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified

DecisionSlide10

Multiple tests

t

= contrast ofestimatedparametersvarianceestimate

t

h

t

h

h

t

h

What is the problem?Slide11

Multiple tests

t

= contrast ofestimatedparametersvarianceestimate

t

h

t

h

h

t

h

Penalize each independent

o

pportunity for error. Slide12

Multiple tests

t

= contrast ofestimatedparametersvarianceestimate

t

h

t

h

h

t

h

Convention: Choose

h

to limit

assuming family-wise

H

0Slide13

Issues

1. Voxels or regions

2. Bonferroni too harsh (insensitive)Unnecessary penalty for sampling resolution (#voxels/volume) Unnecessary penalty for independence Slide14

intrinsic

smoothness

MRI signals are aquired in k-space (Fourier space); after projection on anatomical space, signals have continuous supportdiffusion of vasodilatory molecules has extended spatial supportextrinsic smoothnessresampling during preprocessingmatched filter theorem  deliberate additional smoothing to increase SNRRobustness to

between

-

subject

anatomical

differencesSlide15

Apply

high threshold: identify improbably high

peaks

Apply lower

threshold: identify improbably

broad peaks

Total number of regions?

Acknowledge/estimate

dependence

Detect effects in smooth landscape, not

voxelsSlide16

Null distribution?

1.

Simulate null experiments

2.

Model null experimentsSlide17

Use

continuous random field

theoryimage discretised continuous random field 

Discretisation

(“lattice approximation”)

Smoothness

quantified

:

resolution

elements

(‘

resels

’)

similar, but not identical to

# independent observations

computed from spatial

derivatives of the residualsSlide18

Euler characteristic

(

h

)

threshold

an image at high

h

h



# blobs

FWER

E [

h]

= p (blob)

 Slide19

General form for expected Euler characteristic 2,

F, & t fields

E[h(W)] = Sd Rd (W) rd (h)Small volumes: Anatomical atlas, ‘

functional

localisers

’, orthogonal

contrasts

,

volume

around

previously reported coordinates…

Unified Formula

R

d

(

W

):

d-dimensional

Minkowski functional of W

– function of dimension, space W and smoothness:

R0(W) =

(W) Euler characteristic of W

R1(W) = resel diameter R

2(W) = resel surface area

R3(

W) = resel volume

r

d

(

W

):

d-dimensional EC density of Z(x) – function of dimension and threshold,

specific for RF type:E.g. Gaussian RF: r0(h)

= 1- (h)

r1(h) = (4 ln2)1/2

exp(-h2/2) / (2

p)

r2(h) = (4 ln2)

exp(-h2/2) / (2

p

)

3/2

r

3

(

h

)

= (4 ln2)

3/2

(

h

2

-1)

exp

(-

h

2

/2

) / (2

p

)

2

r

4

(

h

)

= (4 ln2)

2

(

h

3

-

3

h

)

exp

(-

h

2

/2

) / (2

p

)

5/2

Slide20

Euler characteristic (EC) for 2D images

R = number of resels

h = threshold Set h such that E[EC] = 0.05 Example: For 100 resels, E [EC] = 0.049 for a Z threshold of 3.8. That is, the probability of getting one or more blobs where Z is greater than 3.8, is 0.049.

Expected EC values for an image of 100 reselsSlide21

Spatial extent: similarSlide22

Voxel, cluster and set level tests

e

u

hSlide23
Slide24

ROI

Voxel

Field‘volume’

resolution

*

 

volume

independence

 

FWE

FDR

*

voxels/volume

Height

Extent

ROI

Voxel

F

ield

Height

Extent

There is a multiple testing problem (‘voxel’ or ‘blob’ perspective).

More corrections needed as ..

Detect an effect of

unknown

extent &

location

Volume

,

Independence

 Slide25

Further reading

Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RS. Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991 Jul;11(4):690-9.

Genovese CR, Lazar NA, Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):870-8.Worsley KJ Marrett S Neelin P Vandal AC Friston KJ Evans AC. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping 1996;4:58-73.