DanielSillivantUAHedu Using FMEA to Address Warranty Duration FMEA Process Reliability Block Diagrams Critical Items List MTBF and Reliability Calculations OC Curve for Number of Tests Warranty Decisions ID: 687178
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Daniel Sillivant University of Alabama i..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Daniel SillivantUniversity of Alabama in HuntsvilleDaniel.Sillivant@UAH.edu
Using FMEA to Address Warranty DurationSlide2
FMEA ProcessReliability Block DiagramsCritical Items ListMTBF and Reliability CalculationsOC Curve for Number of Tests
Warranty DecisionsOutlineNovember 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit2Slide3
FMEA: Methodology designed to identify potential failure modesBasic Procedure:
Identify the item(s) to be analyzedIdentify the Function(s),
Failure Mechanism(s) (Cause)Failure Mode(s) (How)Failure Effect(s) (Results)Evaluate the issues identified by the analysisAdditional ToolsCritical Items List (CIL)Reliability Block Diagram (RBD)
Reliability Calculations
Warranty Confidence - OC Curves
Physical Testing
Failure
Mode and Effect Analysis (
FMEA)
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
3Slide4
TransportationPackingHandling at each stage of shipment from origin to end userTruck, Rail, Aviation & Sea
StorageDistribution chainAt end userOperational conditions of use (intrinsic)Result from system functionAmbient conditions
of use (extrinsic) Result from environmental exposure and from proximate parts functionalitySources of Failure MechanismsNovember 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
4Slide5
Questions:What mechanism (Stress) caused the failure?
How can the failure occur?What could cause the part to fail?Why could the failure occur
?Are there possible system interactions, operating environments, customer usages that could cause the failure? Examples:Stresses acting upon the part/systemThermal ShockPhysical Shock
Heat/Cold Soak
Failure Mechanisms (Causes)
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
5Slide6
Questions:What are the results of the Failure Mechanism acting
upon the part?How did the part fail because of the failure mechanism? How could the part fail to perform its intended function? What
could go wrong with this part ? What has gone wrong with this part in the past? How could the part be abused or misused? What concerns do you have with this design/ part?
Examples:
Change in
shape
Strain, flexure, bending
Change
in
geometry
Crack initiation & propagation, fracture, wear-out, pitting, gallingChange in material
propertiesCorrosion, intermetallic compounds,
embrittlement, UV decay
Failure Modes (How)
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
6Slide7
Questions:What happens to the part with that failure mode?What happens to the system with that failure mode?
Examples:Part: Light doesn’t workSystem: Performs its intended function
Failure Effects (Results) November 3-4, 2015RAM VIII Training Summit
7Slide8
Part Nomenclature
Source of
Failure MechanismsFailure Mechanism
Failure Modes
Failure Effects
Part
Transportation
Storage
Operation
Ambient
FMEA Template
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
8Slide9
Reliability Block Diagram
Part 1
Part 2Part 3.1
Part 3.2
Part 4
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
9
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7Slide10
Part
Operating Condition
MTBF
Reliability
Year 1
Reliability
Year 3
Part 1
-
55
°
C
-
125
°
C
Part 2
-
60
°
C
-
105
°
C
Part 3.1
-
40
°
C
-
85
°
C
Part 3.2
-
40
°
C
-
85
°
C
Part 4
-55
°
C
-
150
°
C
Part 5
-65
°
C - 150
°
C
Part 6
-65
°C - 150°CPart 7-65°C - 150°C
Critical Items List
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
10Slide11
MTBF Determination MIL-HDBK 217
Results
Parameter
Value
λ
p
0.000001 Failures/10
6
Hours
MTBF
7.759265e+11 hours
FIT
0.001289 Failures/10
9
Hours
http://www.sqconline.com/military-handbook-mil-hdbk-217-beta
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
11Slide12
Reliability Equations
FIT – Failures per Billion hours
Reliability Equation
Failure Rate (
Landa
)
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
12Slide13
Part
Operating Range
FIT
MTBF (
Hrs
)
λ
1
3
5
Part 1
-
55
°
C
-
125
°
C
269.60
4.64E+05
2.16E-06
0.9813
0.9449
0.9098
Part 2
-
60
°
C
-
105
°
C
299.181.11E+068.98E-070.99220.97670.9614Part 3.1-40°
C
-
85
°
C
368.07
1.36E+06
7.36E-07
0.9936
0.9808
0.9683
Part 3.2
-
40
°
C
-
85
°
C
557.09
1.80E+06
5.57E-07
0.9951
0.98550.9759Part 4-55°C - 150°C685.377.30E+051.37E-060.98810.96460.9417Part 5-65°C - 150°C395.138.44E+051.19E-060.98970.9693
0.9494
Part 6
-65
°
C - 150
°
C
331.68
6.03E+05
1.66E-06
0.9856
0.9573
0.9299
Part 7
-
65
°
C
-
150
°
C408.051.23E+068.16E-070.99290.97880.9649
MTBF Determination
November 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit
13Slide14
Operating ConditionsParts not rated for stated conditions of useLow MTBFComponents that are not redundant
Weak LinksNovember 3-4, 2015
RAM VIII Training Summit14Slide15
Heat / Cold
Vibration Thermal ShockPhysical ShockHumidity
CorrosionNovember 3-4, 2015RAM VIII Training Summit
15
Testing
Failure
Mechanisms
Fatigue Testing -
Instron
HALT chamber
Thermal Shock
Cyclic Corrosion Chamber
Drop Test
Altitude Chamber
Dynamic Vibration System
Environmental Chamber
Equipment Used for TestingSlide16
# of
Failures
χ
2
T
n = 3
n = 5
n = 7
n = 10
n = 15
0
4.605
62170
863
518
370
259
173
1
7.779
105022
1459
875
625
438
292
2
10.645
143703
2994
1497
998
665
428
3
13.362
180381
7516
2505
1503
939
578
4
15.987
215827
4496
2248
1285
749
5
18.549
250416
10434
3478
1739
949
OC Curves
TABLE.OC Curves.θLCL = 27,000 hrs(3.080 years)α = 0.1for ConfidenceNovember 3-4, 2015RAM VIII Training Summit
16
Number of Tests NeededSlide17
Questions
November 3-4, 2015RAM VIII Training Summit
17