/
Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data

Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data - PowerPoint Presentation

myesha-ticknor
myesha-ticknor . @myesha-ticknor
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2019-11-24

Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data - PPT Presentation

Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia Missouri What factors should an algorithm account for when generating an N fertilizer recommendation ID: 767767

poor soil corn rate soil poor rate corn infiltration pawc good fertilizer tools weather data yield performance tool sand

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Integrating Weather and Soil Information..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri

What factors should an algorithm account for when generating an N fertilizer recommendation?

Calculation for N fertilizer Rate Missouri NRCS Agronomy Technical Note MO-35: Corn Variable-Rate Nitrogen Fertilizer Application for Corn Using In-field Sensing of Leaves or Canopy 1 2 3 4

Optimal N Rate as a Function of Canopy Reflectance N Rate for Max. Econ. Yield (kg N ha -1 ) 1 2 3

The S oil Factor

Precipitation

Abundant and Well-Distributed Rainfall

What Factors Should Be Considered? Crop Stage of cropSensor specificSoilSoil water holding capacity Mineralizable NN Loss vulnerabilitiesWeatherPoor health, poor stand, no standHybridFarmer intuition (Max and Min)Economics RobustnessEase of Use

What Tool(s) and Supporting Algorithm(s) Captures the Important Factors and Performs Best? Universal Farm/Field Specific

Regional NUE Project Results confounded by Varied methods of sensing Varied N management practices Varied other cultural practices

Needed: Datasets for e valuation and validation, over a wide range of soil and weather scenarios, the yield and economic performance of model and plant sensing decision tools for determining the amount of N fertilizer to be applied to corn.

Performance and Refinement of In-season Corn Nitrogen Fertilization Tools

Data from Project Performance and Refinement of In-season Corn Nitrogen Fertilization ToolsEvaluate DuPont Pioneerp roprietary products and decision aidsEvaluate public-domain decision aid tools, develop agronomic science for improved crop N management, train new scientists, and publish results University

Tools Assessment Yield and soil measurements from these plot studies will provide N response functions that will be used to reference each of the decision tool methods to be evaluated. The N rate that would have been recommended by a tool will be matched with the optimal N-rate. Performance of the tool can be for yield, profitability, NUE, N loss, etc.

Standardized Protocols Site Selection Site characterization Treatment implementationWeather data collectionEquipmentSoil and plant samplingManagement notesData management

16 Sites in 2014

Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri

How might soil EC help characterize in-season corn N fertilizer rate both within field and across the cornbelt ?

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Soil Electrical Conductivity ( mS /m) Relative Productivity Sand Loam Clay Infiltration good PAWC poor Infiltration good PAWC good Infiltration poor PAWC poor

Site Soil EC Maps

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Soil Electrical Conductivity ( mS /m) Relative Productivity Sand Loam Clay IL BRT IL URB NE BRD NE SCAL IA AMES WI WAU WI STU IA MC IN SAND IN LOAM ND DUR (+110) ND AMEN MO TRT MO BAY MN ST CH MN New Rich

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Soil Electrical Conductivity ( mS /m) Relative Productivity Sand Loam Clay Infiltration good PAWC poor Infiltration good PAWC good Infiltration poor PAWC poor

Why Regional Investigation of this kind? Breadth. More comprehensive story when a wider range of soil, weather, and cultural norms are included using standardized proceduresBalance. Build on the unique perspectives and strengths each investigator brings (both with critical and creative thinking), and perhaps also it helps neutralize individual’s biasesStrengthens and Weaknesses. Side-by-side testing of the tools will allow for better understanding of where and when they work best