Burt M Fealing Executive Vice President General Counsel and Secretary Southwire Company Ethical Dilemmas All lawyers are subject to professional responsibility rules and a fiduciary relationship with their clients ID: 548062
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Ethical Dilemmas" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Ethical Dilemmas
Burt M.
Fealing
Executive Vice President
General Counsel and Secretary
Southwire
CompanySlide2
Ethical Dilemmas
All lawyers are subject to professional responsibility rules and
a
fiduciary relationship with their clients.
In
private
practice, ethical rules that deal with fees, trust accounts and advertising are clear.
But the
in-house
counsel face different and often thorny situations not directly addressed by these rules.Slide3
Ethical Dilemmas
An
in-house
lawyer has one client. The business, be it a corporation, partnership or sole proprietorship that hired him is his sole client.
He
is NOT the lawyer for the executives, management or employees other than when the interest of those parties directly aligns with the
business.
This
means there are a lot of ethical dilemmas
in-house
with no clear cut answers or rules to directly turn to for guidance.Slide4
Scenario 1 - $1 for Your Representation
An
employee or more likely a high level manager or executive comes to you with a story “for your ears only.
”
When you hear something like that, a warning bell should
go off
in your head.
These situations
generally arise when you are conducting an internal investigation.
For
example,
what
if your
employee is subpoenaed by the government in connection with some price fixing allegations? Slide5
GC Responsibility - $1 for Your Representation
You,
as the corporate
attorney,
have an obligation to insure the company complies with the subpoena and produces the relevant information.
Your employee may see it differently and feel entitled to you representing him directly.
If your employee acted within the guidelines of corporate policy, his interests align with the company’s interest. Defending the company is the same as defending the employee.Slide6
GC Responsibility- $1 for Your Representation
What
if the employee acted in a different
manner than what the company rules proscribe?
They are willing to give you $$$.
You have to be able to tell that manager or executive that they can and should get their own
lawyer.
[Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest.]
You are in a difficult position if the most
senior exec is the one asking for “your ears only” and holds the keys to your reviews, promotions or
whether you
are fired. Slide7
GC Responsibility-
$1 for Your Representation
What do you do?
The
best advice I’ve been given is to look at the rules of professional responsibility, apply common sense and your conscience and ask, how would your actions affect corporate value
and
shareholders
and
how
would your
actions
appear
to
your
Mom? Slide8
Scenario
2
– U.S. Too Litigious
Another common situation is “up the ladder reporting”
.
Imagine
a scenario where your CEO has engaged
in
activities that do not appear to comply with the law. In fact, imagine he has acted to further along what you suspect is a bribe
of
a foreign official in
another
country. You know the
behavior
in
question
could
be a violation
of
the FCPA.
(Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act).
Slide9
GC Responsibility - U.S. Too Litigious
What do you do? Today in-house lawyers
are viewed as gatekeepers. We are the ones who are in the cross hairs of the regulators and are implicitly as well as explicitly charged with “keeping the company honest.” We in effect are the ones who act to prevent fraud and corporate bad acts
.
A common way to describe this is the
in-house
lawyer
in effect performs
the whistleblower function.Slide10
GC Responsibility - U.S. Too Litigious
First look to the rules. They state
you cannot assist in a crime or bad acts and must take steps to prevent bodily harm
.
[Rule 1.16 – Terminating Representation]
In this instance, you
as the in-house
counsel have an obligation to conduct an initial internal
investigation and escalate to an audit committee if the investigation yields something that seems suspicious. Situations like
this can arise from seemingly innocent circumstances and
in-house
counsel
has to be on
his
game to know when to ask questions.Slide11
GC Responsibility - U.S. Too Litigious
At
this point, it is time to call outside
counsel?
YES!
In
particular, a white collar attorney should evaluate. And, it is time to contact the Audit Committee and inform them an investigation is going to
commence and
they have to conduct that investigation.
You
, as
in-house
counsel have done your part. You are no longer directly involved and you must hand the issues off to your outside counsel and the Audit Committee. You DO NOT conduct the investigation past the initial assessment.Slide12
Scenario 3 - Germany
Imagine
a situation where
you know that an employee is embezzling funds and stealing information. They are intentionally setting up a competing company to go head-to-head with your company.Slide13
Scenario 3 - Germany
Now imagine the
reason you know this information is because the employee sent an email by error to their boss and the email contained all of the details.
You have an investigation but you have come across privacy rules in Germany.
Individual has conducted private activities on their work computer. Works council? International police? Criminal prosecutor?Slide14
Scenario 4 - Bribery / FCPA
What if your outside counsel tells you that you can just effectively turn a blind eye because what you’ve uncovered so far fits within a “gray area.” Let me ask you. What does your gut tell you?
The
people I know who have gone through real situations like this knew they were being advised to close their eyes to what was going on, keep everything running smoothly as if there were no bribery allegations, and
they
would keep their jobs with no one the wiser.Slide15
GC Responsibility
- Bribery / FCPA
In
this real life situation
,
the
people I
know followed
their
gut,
fired their outside
counsel, made
the
appropriate disclosures
and eventually
left the
company when
the
issues
were not resolved.Slide16
GC Responsibility - Bribery / FCPA
The very real problem here for
inhouse
counsel
is, once we know there is wrongdoing going on, we cannot turn a blind eye, no matter
how
outside counsel advises us. We have a fiduciary obligation to our client. It puts us in a position of having to resign from our positions if, after advising the company of wrongdoing, the company refuses to step up and work on the solution
.
We have no whistleblower protections. Yes, we are obligated to take action and are the only profession which has to resign in the face of these types of circumstances
.
The questions of ethics plagues us humans. It also is a fundamental part of
who we are.Slide17
Executive Summary
Always
remember who your client is.
You are there to prevent fraud and corporate bad acts
.
Understand
where your line is in the sand as far as personal ethics and what it would take for you to leave employment if there was no other solution.
Stay
up to date on the latest in ethics
training.
The regulators will go after the gatekeepers and that is a practice we can already start to see happening.
Know there
is a “target” on the back of GC’s and
in-house
counsel today.
Be
smart, diligent, have
common
sense, and remember to behave so that your
Mom/Dad
would be proud of you
.