PPT-Evaluating Educator Impact on Student Learning

MASS Midwinter Meeting March 17 2015 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES Place Student Learning at the Center Promote Growth and Development Recognize Excellence Set a High Bar for Tenure Shorten Timelines for Improvement. Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and . Evaluation. Spring 2015 Webinar. Outcomes. Explain . the three . categories . of evidence required by the Oregon Framework, and identify concrete examples of . Overview of the Code and Case . Studies--Fiscal . 2013. The Standards. The Code of . Ethics . for Arkansas Educators consists of Seven Standards upon which Conduct of Educators is judged as to whether or not a violation or violations have occurred.. S.M.A.R.T. Goals & Educator Plan Development. MSSAA Summer Institute. July 26, 2012. Agenda. S.M.A.R.T. Goals . The role of goals in the 5-Step Cycle. Two types of goals. Why team goals?. S.M.A.R.T.er Goals = Educator Plans. Evaluating Collective Impact. : . Assessin. g. Your Progress, Effectiveness, and . Impact. Today’s Agenda. Welcome. Jennifer Juster, Collective Impact Forum. Context for the Guide to Evaluating Collective Impact. aka: DDMs. What is a DDM?. Think of a DDM as an . assessment tool . similar to MCAS.. It is a . measure of student learning, growth, and achievement. related to MA curriculum frameworks or other relevant set of standards for a particular discipline.. Discussion and Vote to Amend the Regulations. Heather Peske, Senior Associate Commissioner. Ron Noble, Director of Integration and Strategy. Educator Evaluation in MA. Five Key Priorities. Promote Growth and Development. Using Comprehensive . Equity Indicators. 2017 NNSTOY Annual Teachers Leading Conference: A Clear Voice, A Collective Vision . Sunday, July 16, 2017. Wesley Williams, II . Senior Project Director, Westat. Noting unusual patterns or trends. Identifying gaps in learning. Use of scores. To show overall classroom trends with respect to the learning progression. To show the status of each individual student . Understand the process for self-reflection and professional growth planning . Objectives. A process . by which certified personnel . assess . the effectiveness and adequacy of their professional knowledge and performance for the purpose of identifying areas for professional learning and growth. Noting unusual patterns or trends. Identifying gaps in learning. Use of scores. To show overall classroom trends with respect to the learning progression. To show the status of each individual student . Understand the process for self-reflection and professional growth planning . Objectives. A process . by which certified personnel . assess . the effectiveness and adequacy of their professional knowledge and performance for the purpose of identifying areas for professional learning and growth. September 2012. 1. Welcome. Please sit with members from your school or district team. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. 2. ESE Training Modules for Evaluators. 1-Hour Overview. (hip. s. 101—The basics). . Gordon Uno. Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology. University of Oklahoma. guno@ou.edu. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses . (Arum and . . Alaster Scott Douglas . University of Roehampton. alaster.douglas@roehampton.ac.uk. TEAN (the Teacher Education Advancement Network). Annual conference. ‘The Ambition of Teacher Education’. Friday May 11th 2018.