Sheldon Herring PhD Clinical Director Outpatient Brain Injury and Young Stroke Program Identifying and Tracking Changes in Cognition Related to NPH OUTLINE Background Cognitive changes associated with NPH ID: 508707
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Identifying and Tracking Changes in Cogn..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Identifying and Tracking Changes in Cognition Related to NPH
Sheldon Herring, Ph.D.
Clinical Director
Outpatient Brain Injury and
Young Stroke ProgramSlide2Slide3
Identifying and Tracking Changes in Cognition Related to NPH
OUTLINE
Background
Cognitive changes associated with NPH
NPH- a distinct dementia (?)
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Role of Cognitive Assessment
Timing of Assessments
Benefits of testingSlide4
Stargazing 101Slide5
Stargazing 102Slide6Slide7Slide8Slide9Slide10
Cognitive changes associated with NPH
Impairment of wakefulness or vigilance Psychomotor speed
Attention and concentration
Memory and learning
Visual-perceptual, spatial, and constructive ability
C
alculus or arithmetic
R
eading and writingSlide11
Cognitive changes associated with NPH
Problem-solving
ConceptualizationAbstract reasoning
Executive functions
Awareness of change and deficit (anosagnosia)Slide12
Cognitive changes associated with NPH
Differences remain after exclusion of patients with more severe deficits.
Pattern of associations between neuropsychological domains was consistent with multi-regional pathological changes and impaired connectivity.
Severity of cognitive deficits not always associated with chronicitySlide13
Cognitive changes associated with NPH
C
erebrovascular disorders or shown to add substantially to the neuropsychological impairment in a manner “aptly described as more of the same”.
Hellstrom
et al 2007Slide14
Hellstrom et all Neurosurgery 2007Slide15
NPH- a distinct dementia (?)
Stargazing 201
NPH greater impairment on measures of frontal lobe functioning while AD worse on verbal memory ( Saito et al 2011)
Cortical- subcortical debateSlide16
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Cognitive area showing improvement after shunting include:
Delayed verbal recall
M
emory for designs (visual memory)
Visual constructional abilities
P
sychomotor speed
V
isual scanningSlide17
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Cognitive area showing improvement after shunting include:
Executive skills may be more variable. DeVito et al 2005
Physical symptoms (gait) greater change than cognition in many casesSlide18
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
There is no general agreement about which cognitive functions are
more likely to be restored after shunt placement.
Iddon
et al showed that more demented patient showed significant improvement after surgery whereas
nondemented
patients remain unchanged.Slide19
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Thomas (2005)showed verbal memory and psycho motor speed more likely to respond to shunt surgery with half of their patient showing changes as early as three months.
If verbal
and
visual constructional functioning was impaired, less likely to see improvement.
Some of these improvements parallel increase in corpus callosum size as noted on the MRISlide20
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Metabolic changes assumed related to improved cognition measurable within one week of shunt
Statistically significant changes noted across groups at 1, 3 and 6 months
Improvement after 12 months unlikelySlide21
NPH- a reversible dementia (?)
Need to note that even with patients who show improvement there is increased risk of cognitive decline years down the road.
At 4.8 years 80% showed cognitive decline and 46% showed clinical dementia.
Picascia
et al 2015Slide22
Role of Cognitive Assessment
Group profiles do not predict individual patterns.
Individualized neuropsychological profiles are required for clinically relevant conclusions
Individualized testing converts the hypothetical into the real.
Goes beyond the “what” to the “so what”.Slide23
Role of Cognitive Assessment
Neuropsychological evaluation versus mental status testing
Even patients with MMSE of greater than 26 can show neuropsychological deficitsSlide24
Role of Cognitive Assessment
Diagnostically:
The inter-correlation of tests justifies some reduction in testing without jeopardizing sensitivity. (
Hellstrom
2007)
Minimally, diagnostic
testing can be more focused and should include measures of executive skills, memory (verbal and visual*) and psychomotor abilities (
Hellstrom
2012)
Optimally, premorbid intelligence, apathy, depression, quality-of-life, dementia screen, memory, including verbal and visual learning, executive skills, attention, psychomotor speed, and visual construction skills. (DeVito 2005)Slide25
Role of Cognitive Assessment
Other potential applications such as competence, return to work, etc. may require more broader testing.
In cases where the hydrocephalus may be secondary to other prior medical events such as meningitis, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or trauma, screening may be less appropriate and a broader assessment required.Slide26
Timing of Assessments
Pre- and post surgery benefits
There been two documented cases where post shunt
testing revealing decreased neuropsychological performance after shunting compared to premorbid testing
leading to
discovery of subdural fluid collections Slide27
Benefits of testing
Personal
FamilyUnderstanding of behaviors
Intentional versus non-intentional
Significance of strengths and deficits (driving, financial decisions, other important decision making)Slide28Slide29