Professor Jason P Nance Levin College of Law Some Hard Truths Few law students do as well as they had hoped coming in This a time of readjustment for many as we take a group of extremely bright people and reorder them from top to bottom ID: 277256
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Reviewing Your First Semester: Improving..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Reviewing Your First Semester: Improving Exam Performance
Professor Jason P. Nance
Levin College of LawSlide2
Some Hard Truths
Few law students do as well as they had hoped coming in. This a time of readjustment for many, as we take a group of extremely bright people and “reorder them” from top to bottom.
This is not the mythical Lake
Wobegon
. All of you cannot be “above average.”Slide3
More Hard truths . . .
In law school, we violate nearly every good practice when it comes to use of examinations to teach:
Too few exams
Too little feedback
Too little chance to learn from mistakesSlide4
So, What to Do?
DON’T GIVE UP!! MANY STUDENTS DO IMPROVE GRADES AND RISE IN RANK AFTER FIRST SEMESTER.
See Your First Year Professors, If Possible
Key: Disarm professor by stating upfront that you are not interested in challenging your grade, but only interested in learning from exam
Why?Slide5
Understand Professor’s Perspective
He/she has worked very hard grading, and has tried to be very fair. Grading is worst part of job. Must be done in context. When you challenge grade, it brings out worst in professor.
Also, many professors curve UP to the mandatory 3.25 GPA. That means that some of them feel that they have already been TOO generous with their grades. They think that you should be happy with your grade – w/out curve, it likely would have been much worse!Slide6
So, Try to See Your Exam
With Answer Key,
to honestly assess what you could have done better
. Do Not use it as subterfuge to fight over the grade.
Ask for explanations of what you did wrong.
Do not be surprised if your professor’s answers to your questions are relatively vague, as the difference between a B+ and an A or A- exam may be difficult to explain, especially after the fact. Grading occurs in context.Slide7
Here’s a Summary of What Some Professors Had to Say
Students often
FAIL TO ANSWER THE SPECIFIC QUESTION ASKED ON THE EXAM.
They want to prove how much doctrine they know rather than attack the question as a problem to be solved.
Some students fail to follow directions.Slide8
“I wish I could find some way to convince students that displaying some degree of informed intellectual curiosity is the best way to perform well on exams.
You have to sound like you’re interested in engaging the problem.”
“I have found that poor performance rests primarily on
superficial analysis
of the problem statements rather than simple lack of knowledge of doctrine . . . .”Slide9
Take Away Message?
Now, more than ever, hard work will pay off because you have a better idea of what is expected of you and what will work.
Don’t necessarily do just more of the same; adjust study
habits.
Keep things in perspective; remember that you’re at a great law
school. There
is more to good lawyering that law school grades.Slide10
Questions?