to use dipstick test in elderly in the diagnosis of UTI Number needed to harm from treating asymptomatic bacteriuria 3 Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in elderly care home is high 50 women 40 men ID: 627693
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SIGN Guidance advises not" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
SIGN Guidance advises
not
to use dipstick test in elderly in the diagnosis of UTI
Number needed to harm from treating asymptomatic bacteriuria = 3
Prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in elderly care home is high (~50% women, ~40% men)
Dipsticks are cheap, widely available and everyone can do them
The positive predictive value of dipstick for UTI in elderly patient is therefore low ~50%
What’s the problem with dipsticks?
Dipsticks are commonly misinterpreted by healthcare staff especially in elderly patients, leading to unnecessary antibiotic useSlide2
Summary of baseline data test-runOne GP practice’s prescribing to 6 care homes
Does not include OOH prescribing148 prescriptions to 51 residents in 12 monthsSample of prescriptions for UTI reviewed by Clinical Pharmacist:“Task from reception” in all but one casePhoned call from care home
reception create task for GP Prescription issuedClinical Assessment
2/3rds of episodes had no clinical details recorded at all
in patient record.Urine DipstickAll patients had urine dipstick, poor recording of results
80% were positive. 20% were negative and treated as UTI anyway!
Incorrect interpretation of dipstick, as used for both PPV and not for NPVOnly information recorded in patient record was positive dipstick in a significant proportion of patientsSlide3
To Key messages from NHS BaNES Project ‘To Dip or Not To Dip’
Used an evidence-based algorithm based on SIGN guideline 88,
to diagnose UTI in care home residents
Educational intervention and resources focused on use of the guidance and good hydration / avoiding AKI
Results:67% relative reduction in the number of antibiotic prescriptions56
% relative reduction (24% absolute reduction)
in the number of care home residents
prescribed antibiotics for
UTI 82%
relative reduction
in the number of residents prescribed
prophylactic antibiotics for UTI
Improved
appropriate management of
UTI according to SIGN
Reduction in unplanned admissions
for UTI,
urosepsis
and AKI
Reduced calls
to GP practices for inappropriately diagnosed UTISlide4
ENHCCG Project Outline