By Mary Knutson RN Teaching Moral Concepts It is challenging to convey difficult and abstract concepts of moral philosophy Thought experiments are commonly used in physics mathematics and philosophy ID: 306678
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Thought Experiments: Thin Cases" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Thought Experiments: Thin Cases
By Mary
Knutson, RNSlide2
Teaching Moral Concepts
It is challenging to convey difficult and abstract concepts of moral philosophy
Thought experiments are commonly used in physics, mathematics and philosophy
They require students to consider the logical consequences of their own intuitive moral judgments and competing theoretical frameworks.Slide3
Effective Teaching Strategy
Students are asked to imagine a scenario which is intentionally schematic and devoid of detail (thin cases)
They are asked to suggest action alternatives for the characters
They are asked to justify their moral judgmentsSlide4
Why are Thin Cases Used?
They are a fun and exciting way to teach important theoretical considerations
The ethical issues surface again when the instructor moves on to discuss real-life situations (thick cases) or case studies
Thin cases are not meant to resolve issues, but are exercises/teaching strategiesSlide5
An Example:
A runaway train is rapidly bearing down on five unsuspecting individuals who are hiking along the tracks. Between the people and the train there is a switching device, which, when manually activated, would divert the train on to a secondary track. Standing near the switch is a fellow named Bloggs. He sees the train heading for the hikers and quickly realizes that he can save the five hikers from certain death simply by pulling the switch. Slide6
What Should He Do?
At this stage in the thin case, the right answer seems obvious- to pull the switch
The student is asked to justify their answer
The instructor then adds moral complexity to the scenario…
The two most apparent alternatives are to take no action, which would allow the people to be hit by the train, or to pull the switch. Slide7
Dilemma: Bloggs sees a person standing on the secondary track. What should he do?
Typical responses:
Bloggs should save the five hikers instead of the one
Perform no action that would cause death to the one person, no matter the consequences
Do nothing-no obligation to assist
Responses represent moral theory:
Utilitarianism
Deontological
Doing/allowing distinction (allowing death is not causing death)Slide8
He sees that the lone person on the track is his mother! What should he do now?
Many students change their moral judgment to save the mother
A lively discussion could follow when justifying saving one life instead of the five
How are we to weigh the good of particular others against the general good?Slide9
Moral Distress Is Experienced
What role should personal relationships have in our moral decision-making?
Steadfast utilitarians insist that Bloggs should still pull the switch and save the five people
Another thought experiment can be used to push their thinking further…Slide10
A lone hermit goes to the hospital for routine treatment. She is a perfect match for five patients desperately awaiting organ transplant. She has no relatives, and could be painlessly anesthetized. Would the hospital be morally justified in killing her to save the others in need?
This situation may seem absurd, but to those who insisted that the good of many should outweigh the good of one is a direct challenge to articulate the morally relevant differences between the casesSlide11
Benefits of Using Thin Cases
Students make moral judgments regarding difficult cases and feel the tension of a moral dilemma
They move from intuitive level responses to more reflective judgments and test the coherence of their viewsSlide12
More Benefits
Students uncover the important role consequences, action, and special relationships play in moral decision-making
They examine similarities and differences in cases, and better understand moral theoriesSlide13
Limitations of Thin Cases
According to J. Hubert (personal communication, September 19, 2002), they should be used sparingly
Best if used only for concept introduction
They are not a substitute for real-life cases, which are introduced when basic concepts and analytical skills are masteredSlide14
References
Hubert, J. (1999). The thought experiment as a pedagogical device in nursing ethics education. Journal of Nursing Education. 38, 374-376.
Sorensen, R. (1992), Thought Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.
This presentation was developed in 2002.