PPT-A Code Inspection Process for Security Reviews

Author : olivia-moreira | Published Date : 2018-02-06

Gabriele Garzoglio garzogliofnalgov Computing Division Fermilab Batavia IL SCOPE GOALS LESSONS LEARNED This work defines a process to assess the security issues

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "A Code Inspection Process for Security R..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

A Code Inspection Process for Security Reviews: Transcript


Gabriele Garzoglio garzogliofnalgov Computing Division Fermilab Batavia IL SCOPE GOALS LESSONS LEARNED This work defines a process to assess the security issues of a software artifact The goals of the process are to identify the technical risks associated with the application and the impact of these technical risks The focus is on studying the security issues within the code itself rather than with the operations of the software . General Building Construction Wall Panels Curtain Walls and Veneers BC 170410 RA or PE Civil or Structural Engineering and 1 Year relevant experience Bachelors degree in Architecture or Civil Engineering or Structural Engineering and 2 years relevan Vision for Solder Paste Depositing. Review by Jeremy . LeFevre. Authors. Yongcong. . Kuang. the College of Mechanical Engineering. South China University of Technology. Guangzhou, China. Shenglin. Lu. Andreas Fuchsberger. Information Security Technologist. Microsoft. Agenda. Code Analysis/Code Inspection. Motivation. Static Code Analysis. History. Current technologies. CAT.NET. How CAT.NET works. Installation. Objectives. Today. The inspection process. Practice inspection. Heuristic evaluation process. Practice evaluation. Next time. Rationale behind why inspections and heuristic evaluation is so great. Normally would do this in the opposite order, but this way you should be able to better prepare any materials over the weekend. Assignment. Each team should perform a code review. Select . a section of code. Select . your more difficult code sections.. Other members of the team and the instructor will be given copies of the code to review at least 48 hours ahead of time.. (ESaaS §12.6). © 2013 Armando Fox & David Patterson, all rights reserved. The Fastest . D. atabase is the One . Y. ou Don’. t . U. se. Caching: . Avoid touching database if answer to a query hasn’. Introduction. Agenda Item 9D. Presented by:. Preston Shopbell, PE. Central Valley Flood Protection Board . March 23, 2018. Background. The 2017-18 Budget provided an increase of $2.2M to better accomplish our statutory responsibilities. December 2013. Michael Campbell. ViaSat, Inc.. NISPOM Requirements. Interpretation. Category Level. Business . Best Practices. Available Tools. Pre-Inspection. Self-Inspection. Post-Inspection. Communication. Course. Baseline and Category One. Cars, Trucks . (<17001*), . Trailers . (<10001*). * Registered gross vehicle weight. Overview and Description of Course. This course is derived from sections of the Motor Vehicle Code (75 Pa. C.S. 4101-4982). It is presented in a format that is more readily understandable than the Code itself. It does not have every word of the Code in the Course, rather it calls out the “need-to-know” material that an Inspecting Technician must have to perform an inspection properly. If questions arise outside of the Course material, we will refer to the Code.. Acquisition (SCADA) system security. Reading . Nicholson. et al. .’ 2012. SCADA security in the light of . Cyber-Warfare. 2012. Computers & Security, . Volume 31, Issue 4, June 2012.,. . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404812000429. N failing to connect eleven vehicles to the BAR-OIS when they were being certified. b. Cal. Code Regs., tit. 16, $ 3340.24, subd. (c): Respondent Millennium Auto Care w falsely or fraudulently iss “ . Determining the most appropriate manufacturing processes and the sequence in which they should be performed . t. o produce a given part or product specified by designed Engineering. ”.. It can also be defined as “. Associate Director. Quality Improvement Office. Office of Research Compliance. Federal Agency Audit. Conducted by FDA, Office of Human Research Protections, Office of Research Oversight, etc. . FDA most commonly performs Routine Inspections as part of the approval process for drugs or devices but can also audit For Cause.. activities. 1. Requirements. Background. AS9102B 4.2b. : FAI planning shall address the activities to be performed throughout the FAI process and identify the responsible organizations for those activities..

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"A Code Inspection Process for Security Reviews"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents