PPT-Reflectivity and Pedestrian Safety

1 Where are some places you have seen reflection 2 How do you think reflections work How does Reflectivity happen Light is invisible so we cant see it until it bounces off something and hits our eyes . Detection: . introduction. Approaches. Holistic detection: use local search window that meets . criterias. Part-based detection: pedestrian as a collection of parts (to be found!). Patch-based detection: local features matched against a (learned) codebook, then voting for final detection. Contractor: Corporate Research Associates Inc.. April 2013. HRM Crosswalk Safety. Study: Pre + Post Wave Results . Methodology. The pre-wave of the survey was administered online to a sample of adult HRM residents during the February 26-March 1, 2013 period. . CHAMPAIGN CITY COUNCIL • STUDY SESSION • JULY 9, 2013. Why develop a Pedestrian Plan?. Council goals support creating a pedestrian plan. Council Goal 1: . “Our City Fosters Quality of Life. for All Citizens”. GIS Analysis. APTAC. July 2015. Kate Brady. Pedestrian Plan Outline. Introduction. Existing conditions. Inventory of existing facilities and policies. Safety and crash data. Goals, Objectives, Recommended Actions.  . Look before you cross the road to ensure it is safe to do so. .. Unplug your earphones and put away your phone so you are not distracted.. Always use pedestrian crossings where possible. .. When walking near roads always use the footpath. Designing for Pedestrian Safety – Interchanges. 7-. 2. At the end of this module, you will be able to:. Identify how land uses around freeway interchanges create pedestrian trips. Explain how and why pedestrian crashes occur at interchanges (driver expectation of pedestrians is very low; high-speed, free-flow movements). Steps. Step 1 – Establish Goals and Objectives. Step 2 – Analyze Safety Data. Step 3 – Gather Stakeholder Input. Step 4 – Identify Safety Improvements. Step 5 – Implement and Evaluate Programs. Topics. Systemic Introduction. Methodologies and tools. Potential countermeasures. Examples. Systemic Introduction. Traditional. Systemic. Choosing an approach to improve safety. Traditional Crash-Based Approach. Town of Maggie Valley . Board of Aldermen . October 10, 2016. A Call To Action . 2015-2016 Town Center Master Plan. Public Driven Process. Board of Aldermen interact with the plan in real time; same as public. Specular reflectivity. Quantitative information of thickness and SLD in Z direction. Ѳ. refl. =. Ѳ. incident. Footprint, Critical angle. q. -4. decay, roughness. 7 to 8 orders of magnitude drop in intensity. Safety at Railroad Grade . Crossings. Paul . Metaxatos and P.S. Sriraj. Urban Transportation Center. University of Illinois at Chicago . Email. : pavlos@uic.edu. 62nd . Annual . Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference. Savannah, GA. October 19, 2017. 1. 1-. 2. How many grew up as Free Range Children?. 3. Are your kids Free Range? . MiniCooped. 1-. 4. A more important Question. 5. How many Pedestrians did not make it safely across the roadway in the United States? . Pedestrian Master Plan Update Seattle Planning Commission Tracy Krawczyk, Ian Macek December 8, 2016 Our mission, vision, and core values Committed to 5 core values to create a city that is: Safe Interconnected The state charged Namyst with careless driving and failing to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk or at an intersection in violation of Minn Stat 16913 subd 2 21 subd At Namysts jury trial AP and JP