/
The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why Many Modern Brewers The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why Many Modern Brewers

The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why Many Modern Brewers - PowerPoint Presentation

olivia-moreira
olivia-moreira . @olivia-moreira
Follow
371 views
Uploaded On 2016-02-24

The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why Many Modern Brewers - PPT Presentation

Discussant Jeremy Kees   Why use a Secondary Remove beer from the yeast cake trub Autolysis To quote John Palmer How to Brew 1ed When a yeast cell dies it ruptures releasing several offflavors into the beer When you have a large yeast mass on the bottom of the ID: 229428

beer yeast palmer secondary yeast beer secondary palmer flavors autolysis fermentation good smell potential jamil large pitching

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

The Myth of Secondary Fermentation: Why Many Modern Brewers (including Palmer) Don’t Recommend It

Discussant: Jeremy Kees

 Slide2

Why use a Secondary?

Remove beer from the yeast cake (

trub

)

Autolysis

To quote John Palmer (

How to Brew

, 1ed)…

“When

a yeast cell dies, it ruptures - releasing several off-flavors into the beer. When you have a large yeast mass on the bottom of the

fermentor

, you have a large potential for off-flavors due to autolysis.

 If this ever happens to you, you will know it. The smell is one you will never forget

.”

“At

a minimum, a beer that has experienced autolysis will have a

burnt rubber taste and smell

and will probably be

undrinkable

. At worst it will be

unapproachable

.

”Slide3
Slide4

But consider this…

In a recent podcast, John Palmer and

Jamil

Zainasheff

discussed the issue and concluded…

Secondary fermentation was recommended in the 1

st

edition of Palmers book (1999) (which is widely available for free online)

Health and vitality of yeast is different now (i.e., we use liquid yeast and make starters)

YOU DON’T NEED TO TRANSFER THE BEER OFF THE YEAST TO AVOID AUTOLYSIS LIKE WE USED TO RECOMMENDSlide5

My thoughts

Leaving the beer in the primary for a month (and probably 2 months) is not a problem

The very small risk of off flavors is offset by the more likely “damage” done by racking to a secondary (e.g., infection, oxidation) and taking the yeast away too early (e.g.,

diacetyl

, acetaldehyde)

Plus, there is the added benefit of the yeast being able to “cleanup after themselves” (i.e., metabolizing fermentation byproducts)

Use a secondary for

lagering

, ageing, fruit additions, dry hopping, etc.

If it’s good enough for Palmer and

Jamil

, it’s good enough for me!!Slide6

Remember

ANY

strain on the yeast increases the potential for yeast derived off-flavors

Use healthy yeast

Consider pitch rates (use a yeast starter)

Jamil’s “Mr. Malty Pitching Rate Calculator”

Properly aerate the

wort

before pitching

Ferment at cool temps (below 70 for ales and below 50 for lagers)Slide7

Equipment Corner

Refractometer vs. Hydrometer