/
Protocol for Consultants on the Major MOTI Transportation Projects Protocol for Consultants on the Major MOTI Transportation Projects

Protocol for Consultants on the Major MOTI Transportation Projects - PDF document

olivia
olivia . @olivia
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2021-09-01

Protocol for Consultants on the Major MOTI Transportation Projects - PPT Presentation

Page 1 of With Regard to Participation on an Owner146s Team While Participating on RespondentProponent Team on Another Projecthe Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure 147MOTI148 has develope ID: 874647

team project owner 146 project team 146 owner party restricted information members bid conflict firm confidential instances place interest

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Protocol for Consultants on the Major MO..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Page 1 of Protocol for Consultants on
Page 1 of Protocol for Consultants on the Major MOTI Transportation Projects With Regard to Participation on an Owner’s Team While Participating on Respondent/Proponent Team on Another Project he Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure (“MOTI”) has developed this protocol for relationship reviewand management of Conflicts of Interest as defined in the Relationship Review Process Description for therelevant project) in instances where: ��Page 2 of 2 &#x/MCI; 2 ;&#x/MCI; 2 ;b)Are there similarities between the projects such that having access to confidentialinformation withregad to the Owner’s Team (on Project A) could create a Conflict of Interest should the RestrictedParty participate as the member of a Bid Team on roject Bs the individual/firm currently engaged on the roject (for example, Project A) on which they are estricted PartyDoes the Project A Owner’s Team intend to reengage the consultant?Has the Restricted party been part of an evaluation team that would allow it to be privy to MOTI RFQevaluation considerations and thus an opportunity for the Restricted Party (for example, on Project A)to influence the development of the documentation or approaches as a member of theProject AOwner’s Team that could benefit the Bid Team (for example, on Projectof which the RestrictedParty proposes to be a member?Is the timing of the relevant projects such that no Conflict of Interest could result?If there is a Conflict of Interestcaused by the Restricted Party (on Project A) participating as a member of a Bieam on another roject (Project B), the Project B should consider whether the Conflict of Interest can bemitigated, minimized or eliminated throughethical barriers includingWill this Confidential Information be disclosed to all Project B respondents/proponents in the DataRoom?In instances where the Project A and Project B Owner’s Teams are colocated, will there be sufficientfirewalls in place to prevent sharing of confidential information between teams (that is, are adequatthical barriersare in place to prevent the sharing of conf

2 idential information between the Owner&#
idential information between the Owner’sTeams for Project A and Project B so that a Restricted Party for Project A will not haveaccess tnfidential information for Project Bon which they are on a Bid Team)?This could include theProject B Owner taking the risk of ensuring that the two Owner’s Teams do not share information ordo not share information with specific individuals. This could include: declarationsthe Owners’eam members that they understand that certain information cannot be shared with certaindividuals including separate servers, separate support staff, no discussions in public areas, nodiscussion when certain individuals are in the room.Cansufficient ethical barriersbe put in place between the individuals (employees, subcontractorsetc.) of a Restricted Party participating on the Project A Owner’s Team and other individuals of aRestricted Party whoare not participating on the Project A Owner’s Team? This could include theProject A Restricted Party (assuming that it is a firm) putting ethical barriers in place between thndividuals on the Project A Owner’s Team and those on the Project B Bid Team. Examplesinclude:declarations by Owner’s Team members that they understand that confidential information cannotbe shared with nonOwner’s Team members, declaration from the firm that there is no overlappingmembership between the Owner’s and the Bid Team, segregation of all files including securedservers, separate support staff, notification to all nonOwner’s Team members to not discuss throject with the Owner’s Team members.Please note that thisprotocol does not apply in instances wheran individual or firm leaves the Owner’s eam (whether an employee of the public sector or privatesector) and joins(for example, as an employee or a subsidiary)a Restricted Party on the saroject; ora Restricted Party wishes to participate on a id eam for thesameproject on which they have beeestricted.In those instances, the Relationship Review Process Description and the terms of the RFQ/RFP with regard to the Restricted Party designation will apply.