In re XIAOHUA HUANGPetitioner2020Case 20114 Document 13 Page 1 Filed 02282020IN REHUANG2at 13 Fed Cir June 8 2018 Huang v Huawei Techs CoNo 20191726 slip op at 6 Fed Cir Oct 9 2019 M ID: 898657
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "x0000x0000 xMCIxD 0 xMCIxD 0 NOTEThis ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1 �� &#x/MCI; 0 ;&#x/M
�� &#x/MCI; 0 ;&#x/MCI; 0 ;NOTEThis orderis nonprecedentialUnited States Courtof Appeals for the Federal Circuit In re: XIAOHUA HUANG,Petitioner2020 Case: 20-114 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2020 IN REHUANG 2 at 13 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2018); Huang v. Huawei Techs. Co.No. 20191726, slip op. at 6 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2019). Man-dates in both have since issueMr. Huang’s petition is nothing more than an attempt to relitigate the final judgmentthat he previously unsuc-cessfully appealed. Because Mr. Hua
2 ngclearly does not have a right to the r
ngclearly does not have a right to the relief he seeks, the court must deny his petition. See Cheney v.U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. f Co-lumbia, 542 U.S. 367, 38081 (2004). Accordingly,RDERED HAT(1)The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.(2)All pending motions are denied as moot. OR THE OURT February, 2020 /s/Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerkof Courts24 Case: 20-114 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 02/28/202