/
Judy Twedt ~ Kelly Judy Twedt ~ Kelly

Judy Twedt ~ Kelly - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
375 views
Uploaded On 2017-12-16

Judy Twedt ~ Kelly - PPT Presentation

McCusker Cecilia Bitz June 5 2012 Effects of GeoEngineering on the Southern Ocean Reuters A Tale of Two Geoengineering Strategies increase the earths reflectance with stratospheric sulfate aerosols ID: 615796

ocean sulfate annual global sulfate ocean global annual surface greenhouse temperature southern engineering rcp concentrations 2045 removal 288 1960 2060 mccusker 2054

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Judy Twedt ~ Kelly" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Judy Twedt ~ Kelly McCusker ~ Cecilia BitzJune 5, 2012

Effects of

GeoEngineering on theSouthern Ocean

ReutersSlide2

A Tale of Two

Geoengineering Strategiesincrease the earth’s reflectance with stratospheric sulfate aerosolsremove greenhouse

gassesdecrease global mean surfacetemperatureincreased winds;more upwelling

Southern Ocean

b

arely cools

d

ecreased winds;

less upwelling

Southern Ocean Cools

f

easible

now

hypothetically feasibleSlide3

Increasing Albedo with Sulfate Aerosols(Kelly’s work)

Run RCP 8.5 emissions scenarios on CCSM4, with *full ocean dynamics*In 2035, increase Earth’s albedo by prescribing stratospheric concentrations of sulfate aerosols on top of RCP 8.5 greenhouse gasses

Compare with 20th Century Climatology (1970-1999)http://www.noaa.gov/features/protecting_0808/images/volcanoashcloud.jpgSlide4

RCP 8.5

McCusker, 2012Annual Mean Global

Temperature288 K

1960

2060Slide5

RCP 8.5

McCusker, 2012

Sulfate EngineeringAnnual Mean Global Temperature

288 K

1960

2060Slide6

RCP 8.5

McCusker, 2012Annual Mean

Global Temp (k)

Sulfate Engineering

Shut-Off

288 K

1960

2060Slide7

RCP 8.5

McCusker, 2012Annual Mean Global

TemperatureSulfate Engineering

Shut-Off

1850 Reference

288 K

1960

2060Slide8

r

eturn to 1988

GHG concentrationsAnnual Mean Global Temperature288 K

1960

2060Slide9

r

eturn to 1988

GHG concentrationsAnnual Mean Global Temperature

288 K

1960

2060Slide10

Surface Temperature Differences (k)Annual Avg

of Sulfate Engineering (2045-2054) – 20th C (1970-1999)

Sulfates Cool the Arctic more than the Antarctic Slide11

Vertical Temperature Profile Annual

Avg of Sulfate Engineering (2045-2054) – 20th C (1970-1999)

pause Temperature DifferenceSulfates absorb sw radiation in the stratosphere and are confounded with greenhouse gases.

Result: a

poleward

shift in surface

westerlies

Slide12

Near Surface Winds Sulfate Engineering (2045-2054) – 20th C (1970-1999)

The change in the sulfate run is a

strengthening of existing Antarctic winds

i

ncreased westerlies

1970-1999 controlSlide13

Motivating QuestionsWhy didn’t the Southern Ocean cool?Are winds the culprit?

Does the combination of greenhouse gasses & sulfates increase the winds and induce warm water upwelling in the Southern Ocean? Slide14

Modeling Wish Fulfillment (Greenhouse Gas Removal) I ran a branch from the RCP 8.5 scenario In 2035, dropped the GHG emissions to 1988 concentrations; ran 50 years

Prescribed Greenhouse Gas Concentrations

CO2 concentrations of 350 ppm have been proposed as target concentration by Hansen et. al., 2008CO2

CH

4

N

2

O

CFC-11

CFC-12

350

ppmSlide15

Return to 1988 concentrations

(just a reminder)

sulfate geoengineering

2045 – 2054

climatologySlide16

Surface Temperature DifferenceAnnual

Avg (2045 – 2054) of GHG Removal – Sulfate Engineering

Although the global mean surface temp is warmer, the Southern Ocean surface is already cooler! Slide17

Wind Stress Difference

Annual Avg (2045 – 2054) of GHG Removal – Sulfate Engineering

surface westerlies over Antarctica are weaker with greenhouse gas removalSlide18

Zonal Avg Ekman Pumping

Upwelling

*negative*Antarctica

Downwelling

*positive*

‘zero-line’ of the

greenhouse gas removal run is

NORTH

of the sulfate run

90 S

44 SSlide19

Comparison of CCSM4 Cooling Scenarios Stratospheric SulfatesRapid reduction in global

mean surface tempIncreased westerlies over the Southern Ocean – more upwelling, more heating from belowNot a viable means of protecting the Antarctic ice sheet

Greenhouse Gas RemovalReduction in global mean surface tempDecreased Ekman pumpingEkman transport shifts northwardCooling over the Southern OceanSlide20

Next StepsDig deeper into the ocean data and look at the subsurface ocean responseProbe the response rate: how does the Southern Ocean respond so quickly?

Remove MORE greenhouse gasses: simulate a return to pre-industrial forcing? ? ? ?Slide21

I’d like to thankKelly McCusker and Cecilia Bitz for their help and terrific feedback.

That said, any errors are my own. Slide22

xkcd.com/154