/
Optimising  patient adjustment and self care strategies Optimising  patient adjustment and self care strategies

Optimising patient adjustment and self care strategies - PowerPoint Presentation

pamella-moone
pamella-moone . @pamella-moone
Follow
381 views
Uploaded On 2018-03-08

Optimising patient adjustment and self care strategies - PPT Presentation

Dr Siobhan MacHale Consultant Liaison Psychiatrist TUN conference Nov 27 th 2015 Outline Adjustment Adaptive maladaptive adjustment Concordance ID: 642803

transplant patient www concordance patient transplant concordance www adherence medication patients time health people dialysis care renal disease powerlessness

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Optimising patient adjustment and self ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Optimising patient adjustment and self care strategies

Dr Siobhan MacHale Consultant Liaison PsychiatristTUN conference Nov 27th 2015 Slide2

OutlineAdjustment Adaptive

- maladaptive adjustmentConcordanceInterventionsDiscussionSlide3

Normal Reactions to an Abnormal SituationShock

Anger and IrritabilityDenialSadnessAcceptanceSlide4

Illness

Disease

Socio-Cultural

Psychological

PhysiologySlide5

Dialysis patient

Depression 20-30%

Anxiety 20-40%

Cognitive impairmentSlide6

Impact Uncertainty regarding the future Meaning of what has happenedLoss of controlLoss of independenceHelplessnessFatigue

FearDeathSlide7

ImpactRelationships – family

partner (sexuality, fertility) children friendsBody Image Self-esteem Leisure/Workdisfigurement sick role changescarring disability loss

Imagined financial

holidaysSlide8

(Di)stress is “Normal”

Continuum of Distress Mild - Moderate - Severe(Normal, adaptive) (Maladaptive, disabling)Slide9
Slide10

Shock at diagnosis……

‘Following the diagnosis, and the crippling words of ‘youhave chronic kidney failure and need a transplant’ anyfurther meaningful discussion ended as questions took over

all thought’

Dr Duncan Thomas

Thomas, D. ‘The flip side of the coin – a doctor’s experience of renal failure’. Journal of Renal

Care, 2009: 35(1): 16-18Slide11

What are some of these consequences?Loss of confidence in the reliability of the

bodyLoss of trust in the failing organAssumption of health replaced by hypervigilance Sense of powerlessnessSlide12

Powerlessness - Machines

‘no matter how uncomfortable or inconvenient dialysis is, if the individual wants to live, then he or she is dependent upon a machine’ Susan StapletonSlide13

Powerlessness - Time

‘survival depends on compliance with the health care system demands’ Susan StapletonSlide14

Dependence/independence

prior to each dialysis session I have to be weighed. As I stand on the scales,I am reminded by the sign that you must have your weight verified by a member of staff At one time I might have been responsible enough to raise a family, but now I am not responsible enough to weigh myself’Slide15

Powerlessness Behaviour

PassiveFollow direction without comment or questionCan’t make small decisions when invited to do soFail to seek information

Fail to share information

Aggressive

Anger

Frustration

Aggression towards others

Missing dialysis sessions

Silence/VerbalSlide16

Maladaptive Coping Strategies e.g.Substance misuseEating

disordersNon concordence Slide17

Our RolePossible to identify negative reactions earlyReduce adverse impact of negative reactionsReduce morbidity and mortality

‘Preventive psychological care is an investmentthat underpins and secures medical and nursingachievements’Keith NicholsSlide18

32 yr old female

IDDMCRFHx of dep/ANSPK

CASE

EXAMPLESlide19

We know that adherence to medication is very difficult to sustain

WHO report on non-adherenceEstimated that over 30 -50% medicines prescribed for long term illnesses are not taken as directedBlum et al (2009) Systematic review32-90.9% adherence at 12 monthsNon-adherence is the normSlide20

Concordance in the Transplant SettingNoncompliance (action in accordance with a request or demand)

implies rigidly following the instructions of the healthcare provider – suggests noncompliance is the fault of the patient Adherence (behave according to) suggests patients can make rational decisions to take or not take their medsConcordance (agreement between persons)

suggests

an equal partnership between patient and healthcare provider

i.e. joint

decision

makingSlide21

What do we know about non-concordance?

Not specific to disease typeNot significantly related to gender, intelligence, education, occupation, income or ethnicityNot consistent over time, or for individualsNot easily fixed by reminding people, informing people, instructing people or scaring peopleSlide22

“ Drugs don't work in patients who don't take them “ ( C. Everett Koop, M.D. US Surgeon General , 1981-9 )Slide23

Kiley

et al 1993 105 renal transplant recipients followed x18 months minConcordance determined by cyclosporine whole blood levels > 30 ng/mL, maintenance of ideal body weight (< 20% gain), and percentage of missed clinic visits (< 20%). Four groups identified: (1) overall concordant (n = 25),

(

2)

nonconcordant

with

diet

(n = 29, females more likely),

(

3)

nonconcordant with medication (n = 27, males more likely)(4) overall

nonconcordant (n = 29) Slide24

Most patients will be non

-concordantsome of the time

Concordance rates vary

Between patients

Within the same patient

over

time and

across treatments

Thus

it is much more accurate to view

non-concordance

as a behaviour which most people engage in some of the time, rather

than stable characteristics of the “non-concordant patient

”Hotspots eg adolescence/transitionSlide25

Our patientsSlide26
Slide27

Poor HCP-Patient CommunicationLow patient satisfaction +/- recallCognitive difficultiesProblems in planning/executive function or prospective memory

Financial or other barriersPatients know what to do & how BUT are reluctant becauseTREATMENT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE +/or

WORRIES

/CONCERNS ABOUT TREATMENTSlide28

Summary of evidenceSlide29

What does non-concordance predict?Perceived non-

concordance with pre-transplant dialysis seen as a predictor of post-transplant non-concordance But treatment regimens differ markedly Haemodialysis demands thrice-weekly attendance, strict fluid and dietary control and multiple medications. Post-transplant requires strict adherence to medications, but fewer fluid / dietary restrictions

and

few

hospital attendances

While

non

-concordance

with immunosuppressive medications is a

recognised

cause of transplant failure, any association between pre- and post-transplant non-compliance remains unclear

Non-concordance with medication regimens after kidney transplantation is a major risk factor for acute rejection and graft lossKidney transplant recipients highest rate compared with recipients of other types of solid organ transplantSlide30

MeasurementDirect eg monitoringobservation

of medication intake drug assay levels Objective, may interfere with engagementIndirect measures eg patient interviews/ questionnairescollateral reporting,Dialysis fluid levels/wt change electronic pill counters/prescription refills,

clinical outcomes

subjective

and can be

influenced

Multiple sources most reliableSlide31

OVERVIEWSlide32

Immunosuppressive medication

nonadherence

(IMN)Slide33

Immunosuppressive medication non adherence IMNAAcute rejection

Graft loss (x7)Reduced renal functionIncreased health care costs ($ 21 600 /3 yrs)Studies to dateHeart/lung/liver pre tx MNA predicts 1st year IMNAOptimal timing for intervention unknown

1-2 yrs follow up

Renal TransplantSlide34
Slide35
Slide36

RESULTSSlide37
Slide38

Strategies

to Improve Concordance

- EDUCATION

-

Normalise

non-adherence, use a non-judgemental and collaborative stance

- Accept

that your patient

does

not want to let you down so

might not tell you the truth

- Ask patients if they know why they need their medication (make sense of treatment)- Ask patients if they have concerns about taking their

meds over time (negative consqs)- Use the consultation to anticipate and plan Predict barriers, write down solutions Create a bridge between consultations

If you provide a threat message, you have to support self-efficacy Increased anxiety and guilt can lead to avoidance, rather than adherenceOnline

programs and

information:

CDC

Adherence

360

NHS

 

Motivational interviewing

Relaxation and stress reduction training Slide39

LIVING WITH CHRONIC ILLNESS

EducationBetter Health Better Living ProgrammeBeaumont.ie/marcSlide40
Slide41

WEBSITES

www.beaumont.ie/renalunit www.beaumont.ie/marcwww.ika.ie www.nkf.co.uk www.Ihatedialysis.com www.nkf@kidneys.org www.nipka.org

www.getselfhelp.co.uk www.helpguide.org. Slide42

Internationally recognised

Evidence basedEfficacious psychosocial educational intervention model for various disease populationsimproves HRQoL and reduces health distress, with gains maintained at follow-up

Licensed

,

manualised

programme from Stanford University with 20 years of established research in multiple disease

conditions

CDSM PROGRAMMESlide43

BETTER HEALTH, BETTER LIVING (CDSMP)

What is Better Health, Better Living?Psycho-educational workshop for people with chronic conditionsParticipants meet for 2.5 hour sessions once a week for 6 weeksLed by 2 trained leaders , HCPs and peer leaders (patient volunteers) or just peer leaders

Designed to be taught in a community setting

What they learn

Techniques to deal with problems such as frustration, fatigue, pain and isolation

Exercise Methods

Communicating effectively with family, friends and medical professionals

Nutrition

Relaxation

Appropriate use of medication

Decision making in medical care

How they learn it

Action plans

(weekly goals)Group discussion (brainstorming, problem solving)Manualised , scripted educational ‘

lecturettes’Group process and modellingSlide44

CDSMP META ANALYSES FINDINGS

23 studies (1984 – 2009) 8,688 participants (2,902 in RCTs 5,779 in longitudinal studies) Slide45

Mindfulness & Relaxation Centre (MARC)www.beaumont.ie/marcSlide46

On line CBT (that’s free)MoodgymE-couchSlide47

32 yr old female

CRFLDChildren in carePost transplant issues

CASE

EXAMPLESlide48

Those who can develop insight and work with biopsychosocial

management Those who cannot (a minority)2 GROUPSSlide49

Discussion