/
Alex Galea Alex Galea

Alex Galea - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
367 views
Uploaded On 2016-05-22

Alex Galea - PPT Presentation

Assistant Director What Happens at Sponsor Structure of the NIH Intramural Research Research done onsite by NIH scientists 9 of the NIH budget Extramural Research 82 of budget Research grants ID: 330763

weakness score proposal weaknesses score weakness weaknesses proposal nih research strengths grants strong major budget percentile scoring year institute

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Alex Galea" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Alex GaleaAssistant Director

What Happens at Sponsor?Slide2

Structure of the NIH

Intramural Research

Research done onsite by NIH scientists

9% of the NIH budget

Extramural Research – 82% of budget

Research grants

Training

R& D contracts

Research Management &

SupportSlide3

NIH Grant Application Cycle

Proposal Sent to NIH

Proposal sent to the appropriate Institute Advisory Council

Scientific Review Group decides on score for the proposal

Sent to Center for Scientific Research and assigned to Scientific Review Group

PI’s proposal is rejected. PI can revise and resubmit proposal

PI’s proposal is accepted and PI receives award noticeSlide4

Scoring

Approximately half of grants

don’t

get scored and are not discussed at the study section meeting. So you get reviews, but no discussion and no overall priority score

.

New scoring system gives

reviewers

ratings of each scoring

criteriaScored grants (and grant elements) are rated from 1 –

9:1 = perfect score; 9 = worst possible scoreSlide5

SCORING CRITERIA

Score

Descriptor

Additional Guidance on Strengths/Weaknesses

1 Exceptional Exceptionally strong with essentially no weaknesses

2 Outstanding Extremely strong with negligible weaknesses

3 Excellent Very strong with only some minor weaknesses

4 Very Good Strong but with numerous minor weaknesses

5 Good Strong but with at least one moderate weakness6 Satisfactory Some strengths but also some moderate weaknesses7 Fair Some strengths but with at least one major weakness

8 Marginal A few strengths and a few major weaknesses9 Poor Very few strengths and numerous major weaknesses

Minor Weakness: An easily addressable weakness that does not substantially lessen impactModerate Weakness: A weakness that lessens impactMajor Weakness: A weakness that severely limits impactSlide6

PERCENTILES

Also get a percentile

rank

Percentile lets you compare your

grants

score to the likely

payline (cutoff percentile score). The lower the percentile and the score, the better. Fundable % scores generally published every year by the I/C

ExampleScore

: 21, 11% Payline: 15% - grant is nearly sure to

be funded Slide7

Paylines

Differ

Year by year, given level of NIH budget

Institute by Institute – depends on budget level and their long-term commitments

Depending on the Investigator – Advantage given to new investigators (sometimes get extra 5% points). People who have had K awards or small R grants are

still considered new

investigatorsSlide8