/
Correlation & Regression Correlation & Regression

Correlation & Regression - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
447 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-08

Correlation & Regression - PPT Presentation

The Data http coreecuedupsycwuenschkSPSSSPSSDatahtm CorrRegr See  Correlation and Regression Analysis SPSS Masters Thesis Mike Sage 2015 Cyberloafing Age Conscientiousness ID: 246662

cyberloafing age correlation conscientiousness age cyberloafing conscientiousness correlation spss 000 tailed constant consc part coefficients related residuals data regression

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Correlation & Regression" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Correlation & RegressionSlide2

The Data

http://

core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/SPSS-Data.htm

Cyberloafing

See

 

Correlation and Regression Analysis:

SPSS

Master’s Thesis, Mike Sage, 2015

Cyberloafing

= Age

, ConscientiousnessSlide3

Analyze, Correlate, BivariateSlide4

Pearson Correlations

 

Cyberloafing

Age

Conscientiousness

Cyberloafing

Pearson Correlation

1

-.462**-.563**Sig. (2-tailed) .001.000N515151AgePearson Correlation-.462**1.143Sig. (2-tailed).001 .317N515151ConscientiousnessPearson Correlation-.563**.1431Sig. (2-tailed).000.317 N515151**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).Slide5

Spearman Correlations

 

Cyberloafing

Age

Conscientiousness

Spearman's rho

Cyberloafing

Correlation Coefficient

1.000-.431**-.551**Sig. (2-tailed)..002.000N515151AgeCorrelation Coefficient-.431**1.000.110Sig. (2-tailed).002..442N515151ConscientiousnessCorrelation Coefficient-.551**.1101.000Sig. (2-tailed).000.442.N5151

51

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).Slide6

Analyze, Regression, LinearSlide7

StatisticsSlide8

PlotsSlide9

r

= .1 is small, .3 medium, .5 large

Model

Summary

b

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R SquareStd. Error of the Estimate1.563a.317.3037.677a. Predictors: (Constant), Conscientiousnessb. Dependent Variable: CyberloafingSlide10

ANOVA

a

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1Regression1339.80111339.80122.736.000bResidual2887.5324958.929  Total4227.333

50

 

 

 

a. Dependent Variable:

Cyberloafing

b. Predictors: (Constant), ConscientiousnessSlide11

Coefficients

a

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

 

BStd. ErrorBeta 1(Constant)57.0397.288 7.826.000 Conscientiousness-.864.181-.563-4.768.000 a. Dependent Variable: CyberloafingCyberloafing = 57.039 - .864(Conscientiousness) + errortConsc. = .864/.181 = 4.77 = SQRT(22.736) = SQRT(F)Slide12

Residuals HistogramSlide13

Graphs, Scatter, Simple, DefineSlide14

Chart Editor, Elements, Fit Line at Total, Method = Linear, CloseSlide15
Slide16
Slide17
Slide18

Construct a Confidence Interval for 

the calculator at VassarSlide19

Trivariate

AnalysisSlide20

StatisticsSlide21

PlotsSlide22

R2

Adding Age increased

R

2

from .317 to .466.

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square1.682a.466.443Slide23

ANOVA

ANOVA

a

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.1Regression1968.0292984.01520.906.000bResidual2259.3044847.069  Total4227.33350   Slide24

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

B

Std. Error

1

(Constant)

64.066

6.792Conscientiousness-.779.164Age-.276.075Slide25

Unstandardized Coefficients

Cyberloaf = 64.07 -.78

Consc

- .28 Age

When

Consc

and Age = 0, Cyber = 64.07

Holding Age constant, each one point increase in

Consc produces a .78 point decrease in Cyberloafing.Holding Consc constant, each one point increase in Age produces a .28 point decrease in Cyberloafing.Slide26

How Large are these Effects?

Is a .78 drop in Cyberloafing

a big drop or a small drop?

When the units of measurement are arbitrary and not very familiar to others, best to standardize the coefficients to mean 0, standard deviation 1.

Z

Cyber

= 0 +

1Consc + 2Age Slide27

More Coefficients

 

 

t

Sig.

Correlations

 

Beta

Zero-orderPartialPartConstant 9.433.000   Conscie-.507-4.759.000-.563-.566-.502Age-.389-3.653.001-.462-.466-.386Slide28

Beta Weights

ZCyber

= 0

-.51

Consc - .39Age

Holding Age constant, each one

SD

increase in Conscientiousness produces a .51 SD decrease in CyberloafingHolding Conscientiousness constant, each one SD increase in Age produces a .39 SD decrease in Cyberloafing.Slide29

Semi-Partial Correlations

The correlation between all of Cyberloafing

and that part of Conscientiousness that is not related to Age = -.50.

The

correlation

between all

of

Cyberloafing

and that part of Age that is not related to Conscientiousness = -.39.Slide30

Partial Correlations

The correlation between that part of Cyberloafing

that is not related to Age and that part of Conscientiousness that is not related to Age = -.57.

The correlation between that part of

Cyberloafing

that is not related to Conscientiousness

and that part of

Age that is not related to Conscientiousness= -.47.Slide31

Multicollinearity

The R

2

between

any one

predictor and the remaining predictors is very

high.

Makes the solution unstable.

Were you to repeatedly get samples from the same population, the regression coefficients would vary greatly among samplesSlide32

Collinearity Diagnostics

Tolerance

, which is simply 1 minus

the

R

2

between one predictor and the remaining predictors. Low (.1) is troublesome.

VIF, the Variance Inflation Factor, is the reciprocal of tolerance. High (10) is troublesome.Slide33

Coefficients

a

Model

Collinearity Statistics

Tolerance

VIF

1

Age

.9801.021Conscientiousness.9801.021Slide34

Residuals

Residuals

Statistics

a

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. DeviationNPredicted Value10.2235.4122.676.27451Residual-17.34415.153.0006.72251Std. Predicted Value-1.9832.032.0001.00051Std. Residual-2.5282.209.000.98051No standardized residuals beyond 3 SD.Slide35

Residuals HistogramSlide36

Residuals PlotSlide37

Put a CI on R

2

http://

core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/SPSS-Programs.htm

CI-R2-SPSS.zip

 -- Construct Confidence Interval for 

R

2

 from regression analysisUsing SPSS to Obtain a Confidence Interval for R2 From Regression -- instructionsNoncF.sav -- necessary data fileF2R2.sps -- see Smithson's WorkshopNoncF3.sps -- syntax fileSlide38

Open NoncF.sav

Enter the observed value of

F

and degrees of freedom.Slide39

Open and Run the SyntaxSlide40

Look Back at .sav

FileSlide41

Why You Need Inspect Scatterplots

Data are at http://

core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/Corr_Regr.sav

Four sets of bivariate data.

Bring into SPSS and Split File by “set.”Slide42

Predict Y from X in Four Different Data SetsSlide43
Slide44
Slide45
Slide46
Slide47
Slide48
Slide49
Slide50