/
Bivariate Linear Correlation Bivariate Linear Correlation

Bivariate Linear Correlation - PowerPoint Presentation

aaron
aaron . @aaron
Follow
462 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-04

Bivariate Linear Correlation - PPT Presentation

Linear Function Y a bX Fixed and Random Variables A FIXED variable is one for which you have every possible value of interest in your sample Example Subject sex female or male A RANDOM variable is one where the sample values are randomly obtained from the population of values ID: 533516

regression correlation linear analysis correlation regression analysis linear model relationship beer burger consumption normality random population variance comparing perfect

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Bivariate Linear Correlation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Bivariate Linear CorrelationSlide2

Linear Function

Y = a + bXSlide3

Fixed and Random Variables

A FIXED variable is one for which you have every possible value of interest in your sample.

Example: Subject sex, female or male.

A RANDOM variable is one where the sample values are randomly obtained from the population of values.

Example: Height of subject.Slide4

Correlation & Regression

If Y is random and X is fixed, the model is a regression model.

If both Y and X are random, the model is a correlation model.

Psychologists generally do not know this

They think

Correlation = compute the corr coeff,

r

Regression = find an equation to predict Y from XSlide5

Scatter PlotSlide6
Slide7
Slide8
Slide9
Slide10

For the data plotted below, the linear

r

= 0, but the quadratic

r

= 1.Slide11

Burgers (X) and Beer (Y)Slide12

Burger (X)-Beer (Y) Correlation

.Slide13
Slide14
Slide15
Slide16

Burger (X)-Beer (Y) Correlation

.Slide17

H

ø

:

ρ = 0

df

=

n

– 2 = 3

Now

get an exact

p

value and construct

a confidence intervalSlide18

Get Exact p

Value

COMPUTE p=2*CDF.T(t,df).Slide19

Go To Vassar

http://vassarstats.net/

Slide20
Slide21

N increased to 10.Slide22

Presenting the Results

The correlation between my friends’ burger consumption and their beer consumption fell short of statistical significance,

r

(

n

= 5) = .8,

p

= .10,

95% CI [-.28, .99].

Among my friends, beer consumption was positively, significantly related to burger consumption,

r

(

n

= 10) = .8,

p

= .006,

95% CI [.

34,

.

95].Slide23

Assumptions

Homoscedasticity across Y|X

Normality of Y|X

Normality of Y ignoring X

Homoscedasticity across X|Y

Normality of X|Y

Normality of X ignoring Y

The first three should look familiar, we made them with the pooled variances

t

.Slide24

Bivariate NormalSlide25

When Do Assumptions Apply?

Only when employing t or

F

.

That is, obtaining a

p

value

or constructing a confidence interval.Slide26

Shrunken r

2

This reduces the bias in estimation of

As sample size increases (

n

-1)/(

n

-2) approaches 1, and the amount of correction is reduced.Slide27

Do not use Pearson

r if the relationship is not linear. If it is monotonic, use Spearman rho.Slide28

Every time X increases, Y decreases – accordingly we have here

a perfect, negative, monotonic relationshipSlide29
Slide30

Pearson r

measures the strength of the linear relationship. Notice that it is NOT perfect here.Slide31

Spearman rho measures the strength of monotonic relationship. Notice that it IS perfect here.Slide32

Uses of Correlation Analysis

Measure the degree of linear associationCorrelation

does

imply causation

Necessary but not sufficient

Third variable problems

Reliability

Validity

Independent Samples

t

– point biserial

r

Y = a + b

 Group (Group is 0 or 1)Slide33

Uses of Correlation Analysis

Contingency tables --

Rows =

a

+

b

Columns

Multiple correlation/regressionSlide34

Uses of Correlation Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

PolitConserv =

a

+

b

1

Republican? +

b

2

Democrat?

k

= 3, the third group is all others

Canonical correlation/regressionSlide35

Uses of Correlation Analysis

Canonical correlation/regression

(homophobia, homo-aggression) =

(psychopathic deviance, masculinity, hypomania, clinical defensiveness)

High homonegativity = hypomanic, unusually frank, stereotypically masculine, psychopathically deviant (antisocial)Slide36

Factors Affecting Size of r

Range restrictions

Without variance there can’t be covariance

Extraneous variance

The more things affecting Y (other then X), the smaller the

r

.

Interactions – the relationship between X and Y is modified by Z

If not included in the model, reduces the

r

.Slide37

Power AnalysisSlide38

Cohen’s Guidelines

.10 – small but not trivial.30 – medium.50 – largeSlide39

PSYC 6430 Addendum

The remaining slides cover material I do not typically cover in the undergraduate course.Slide40

Correcting for Measurement Error

If reliability is not 1, the

r

will underestimate the correlation between the latent variables.

We can estimate the correlation between the true scores this way:

r

xx

and

r

YY

are reliabilitiesSlide41

Example

r between misanthropy and support for animal rights = .36 among persons with an idealistic ethical ideology

Slide42

Comparing Correlation/Regression Coefficients

Weaver, B., & Wuensch, K. L.  (2013). 

SPSS and SAS programs for comparing Pearson correlations and OLS regression coefficients

Behavior Research Methods, 45

, 880-895. 

doi

10.3758/s13428-012-0289-7Slide43

H

:

1

=

2

Is the correlation between X and Y the same in one population as in another?

The correlation between misanthropy and support for animal rights was significantly greater in nonidealists (

r

= .36) than in idealists (

r

= .02)Slide44

H

:

WX

=

WY

We have data on three variables. Does the correlation between X and W differ from that between Y and W.

W is GPA, X is SAT

verbal

, Y is SAT

math

.

See Williams’ procedure in our text.

See other procedures referenced in my handout.Slide45

H

:

WX

=

YZ

Raghunathan

, T. E, Rosenthal, R, & and Rubin, D. B. (1996). Comparing correlated but

nonoverlapping

correlations,

Psychological Methods

,

1

, 178-183.

Example: is the correlation between

verbal

aptitude

and math aptitude the same at 10 years of age as at twenty years of age (

longitudinal

data)Slide46

H

:

= nonzero value

A meta-analysis shows that the correlation between X and Y averages .39.

You suspect it is not .39 in the population in which you are interested.

H

:

= .39.