/
I nnovation and  electricity I nnovation and  electricity

I nnovation and electricity - PowerPoint Presentation

phoebe-click
phoebe-click . @phoebe-click
Follow
347 views
Uploaded On 2018-10-21

I nnovation and electricity - PPT Presentation

generation of wind AND solar PV in China Long T Lam PhD Technological Change amp Entrepreneurship Carnegie Mellon Portugal Program May 2 2017 Advisors Prof Inês Azevedo ID: 691877

china energy chinese wind energy china wind chinese 2016 patents 2014 power policy 2012 efficiency china

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "I nnovation and electricity" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Innovation and electricity generation of wind AND solar PV in China

Long T. Lam, Ph.D.Technological Change & EntrepreneurshipCarnegie Mellon Portugal ProgramMay 2, 2017Advisors:Prof. Inês Azevedo Prof. Lee Branstetter (Heinz College)

1Slide2

2

Motivation: The Top 6 Carbon EmittersEDGAR v4.3.2 FT2015(JRC/PBL 2016: IEA 2014 (suppl. With IEA 2016 for China, BP 2016, NBS 2016, USGS 2016, WSA 2016, NOAA 2016)CO2 emissions from fossil-fuel use and cement production in the top 5 emitting countries and EUSlide3

AgendaResearch MotivationChina’s

wind power industry: patents and learning rate*Expert elicitation for China’s solar PV industryGrid integration of China’s renewable energyPolicy implications and conclusionsAcknowledgements 3*: This chapter has been accepted for publication in Energy Policy

as

Lam, L.T.,

Branstetter

, L.,

Azevedo

, I.M.L., 2017. China’s wind industry: leading in deployment, lagging in innovation. Energy Policy

106, 588-599.Slide4

China’s Wind Turbine Industry

Explosive growth in China’s wind energy capacity2001-2010 installed capacity increased more than 100 times; cumulative installed capacity in 2016 was 169 GW.Sources of competitiveness: government support and industrial policies; technology transfer; learning; substantial indigenous innovation

4Slide5

Chinese Wind Power Patents5

China granted thousands of patentsSignificant fraction to Chinese inventorsChinese inventors obtained small number of international patents: 16 from EPO and 91 from USPTOLeading Chinese firms secured few international patentsChinese international patents are less likely to be cited relative to Western counterparts

Patents granted by EPO

Patents granted by

different offices

No. of Patents (Total)

No. of Patents (Annual)

No. of Patents (Total)

No. of Patents (Annual)Slide6

Learning Rates for China’s Wind IndustryDecrease in capital cost drives learning4.5% learning rate using unit capital cost4.1% learning

rate using LCOEModerate relative to historical learning ratesDenmark 8.8% learning from 1981-1990 (100x capacity increase)Germany 12% learning from 1991-2000 (60x capacity increase)China is a late-comer in wind turbine sectorTechnology was adopted from abroadLimited space for technological improvement6Slide7

AgendaResearch MotivationChina’s wind power

industry: patents and learning rateExpert elicitation for China’s solar PV industryGrid integration of China’s renewable energyPolicy implications and conclusionsAcknowledgements 7Slide8

China’s Solar PV IndustryIndustry is similar to others in manufacturing sector

Tech know-how from turn key production lines (de la Tour, 2011)Focus on traditional multicrystalline silicon (mc-Si) technologySmall number of international patentsReports of innovation throughout the industrySharp drop in cell and module production costs and product pricesAdoption of new processes and materials Trina mc-Si cell has world’s highest efficiency (Green et al., 2016)8Slide9

Expert Elicitation9

In retrospect

Rank the importance of different components in reducing c-Si module and system

costs

Identify important technological and non-technological factors

Future prospects

Estimate

efficiency and cost of utility-scale c-Si, thin-film PV, concentrating PV, organic PV, and emerging technologies by 2030

Estimate cost for utility-scale c-Si PV systems in China

16 experts from industry, academia, and national labs

All but three are Chinese nationals

Most experts have had professional experience outside of ChinaSlide10

Important FactorsTechnology adoption and improvement throughout the supply chainDrop in polysilicon price was critical

Some advances were indigenous, e.g. seed-assisted growth methodNon-technological factors were critical as well“Market formation policies” around the world: FIT, RPS, net-metering laws, ITC (Gallagher, 2014)Economies of scale, agglomeration effects, learning-by-doing, human capital mobilization, vertical integration (Yu et al., 2011; Goodrich et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2013, Gallagher, 2014) Open and modular nature of c-Si PV10Slide11

2030 C-Si Module Cost11Slide12

2030 C-Si PV System Cost12

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Cost

, US ¢ /Watt

A B D F G H I K L O

mono

multi

novelSlide13

AgendaResearch MotivationChina’s wind power

industry: patents and learning rateExpert elicitation for China’s solar PV industryGrid integration of China’s renewable energyPolicy implications and conclusionsAcknowledgements 13*:This chapter has been published as Lam, L.T.,

Branstetter

, L.,

Azevedo

, I.M.L., 2016. China's wind electricity and cost of carbon mitigation are more expensive than anticipated. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 1–11. Slide14

China’s Electricity Generation from RenewablesChina installed more wind turbines than the U.S. but generated much less electricity.Pervasive grid connection and curtailment problems

14Slide15

Measuring Performance of China’s Wind TurbinesCapacity factorEx-ante, estimated in CDM Project Design Document (

CF ex-ante)Ex-post using actual generation and cumulative installed capacity (CF ex-post, installed) or cumulative grid-connected capacity (CF ex-post, connected) Utilization factor (UF): portion of hours turbines are in use in a yearOften included in national reportsLevelized cost of electricity (LCOE) and Cost of Carbon Mitigation (CCM) are estimated under the same four scenarios (CF ex-ante;

UF

;

CF

ex-post,

installed;

CF

ex-post, connected

)

15Slide16

Low Capacity FactorsLarge discrepancies between estimated and actual performance

16Slide17

Levelized Cost of ElectricityLCOE is one-half to two times more expensive than estimatedGaps have narrowed in recent years

17Slide18

Cost of Carbon MitigationCCM is four to six times higher than anticipated

18Slide19

Conclusions and Policy Implications (1)Remarkable improvements with few fundamental breakthroughs

Unprecedented production level through economies of scale and learning“Platform for production development” (Nahm and Steinfeld, 2014)Policies are important in creating demandDependency on policy support will continue in the near futureChallenges aheadOvercapacity; short-term focus on profit; delays in advanced cell adoption Heavy focus on c-Si at the expense of other PV technologies19Slide20

Conclusions and Policy Implications (2)China’s experiences can offer policy insights to India and other developing economiesLong-term policy and financial commitment

Comprehensive planning: installation, generation, and distributionTension in dual goals of deployment and employment in manufacturingOpportunities in energy storage and micro-gridsTrade is not a zero-sum gameTariffs hurt Chinese PV makers and U.S. polysilicon producersU.S. customers and PV installers benefit from low pricesTariffs have not necessarily enhanced competitiveness of U.S. PV makers20Slide21

AcknowledgementsCarnegie Mellon Portugal ProgramPortuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

AWEABlakemore Freeman FoundationCEDM, CEIC, Scott Energy Institute (CMU)CMU LibraryFirst China-US PV Youth ForumNSF East Asia Pacific Summer InstituteSPPM (Tsinghua University)21

Profs.

Inês

Azevedo

, Lee

Branstetter

, Kelly Sims Gallagher, Francisco

Veloso

Participating PV experts

Dr. Ahmed Abdullah (UCSD)

Ana Paola Giordano, Tatiana Marques,

António

Moreira (CLSBE

)

Prof. Granger Morgan (CMU)

Prof. Joseph

Yuan, Sun

Shuang

(Tsinghua University

)

Dr. Robert Margolis (NREL

)

Prof. Sally Xu (Peking University)

Dr. Yang Liu (IEA

)Slide22

References (1/2)Anadon, L.D., Bunn, M., Chan, G., Chan, M., Jones, C.,

Kempener, R., Lee, A., Logar, N., Narayanamurti, V., 2011. Transforming US energy innovation. Harvard Kennedy School.Arrow, K., 1962. The economic implication of learning-by-doing. Review of Economic Studies 29, 155–173.Baker, E., Bosetti, V., Anadon, L.D., Henrion, M., Reis, L.A., 2015. Future costs of key low-carbon energy technologies: Harmonization and aggregation of energy technology expert elicitation data. Energy Policy 80, 219–232. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.008Bettencourt LMA, Trancik JE, Kaur J, Determinants of the pace of global innovation in energy technologies, PLoS One, 2013, Vol. 8, e67864Bosetti, V., Catenacci, M.,

Fiorese

, G.,

Verdolini

, E., 2012. The future prospect of PV and CSP solar technologies: An expert elicitation survey. Energy Policy 49, 308–317. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.024

Branstetter

, L., Li, G.,

Veloso

, F., 2015. The rise of international co-invention, in: Jaffe, A.B., Jones, B.F. (Eds.), The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy. University of Chicago Press.

Davidson, M., 2013. Politics of Power in China: Institutional Bottlenecks to Reducing Wind Curtailment Through Improved Transmission. International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE)

Gallagher, K.S., 2014. The globalization of clean energy technology – Lessons from China. MIT Press. Print.

Gallagher, K.S., Zhang, F., 2013. Climate technology & development case study: Innovation and technology transfer across global value chains: Evidence from China's PV industry

Goodrich

, A., Powell, D.M., James, T.L., Woodhouse, M.,

Buonassisi

, T., 2013. Assessing the drivers of regional trends in solar photovoltaic manufacturing. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2811. doi:10.1039/c3ee40701b

Green, M.A., Emery, K.,

Hishikawa

, Y., Warta, W., Dunlop, E.D., 2016. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 48).

Prog

.

Photovolt

: Res. Appl. 24, 905–913. doi:10.1002/pip.2788

Inman, M., 2013. How Low Will Photovoltaic Prices Go? An Expert Discussion.

Kang, J., Yuan, J., Hu, Z., Xu, Y., 2012. Review on wind power development and relevant policies in China during the 11th Five-Year-Plan period. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 1907–1915. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.031

Kahrl

, F., Wang, X., 2014. Integrating Renewable Energy Into Power Systems in China: A Technical Primer – Power System Operations. Regulatory Assistance Project, Beijing.

la Tour, de, A., Glachant, M., Ménière, Y., 2011. Innovation and international technology transfer: The case of the Chinese photovoltaic industry. Energy Policy 39, 761–770. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.050

Lewis, J., 2013. Green Innovation in China: China's Wind Power Industry and the Global Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy. Columbia University Press, New York.

22Slide23

References (2/2)Li C.B., Li P., Feng, X., 2014. Analysis of wind power generation operation management risk in China. Renewable Energy

64 266–75Li, X., Hubacek, K., Siu, Y.L., 2012. Wind power in China - Dream or reality? Energy 37, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.09.030Liu, Y., Kokko, A., 2010. Wind power in China Policy and development challenges. Energy Policy 38, 5520–5529. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.050Luo, S., Lovely, M.E., Popp, D., 2013. Intellectual Returnees as Drivers of Indigenous Innovation: Evidence from the Chinese Photovoltaic Industry. NBER Working Paper.Morgan, M.G., Henrion, M., Small, M., 1992. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Nahm, J., Steinfeld, E.S., 2014. Scale-up nation: China's specialization in innovative manufacturing. World Development 54, 288-300. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.09.003Olivier, J.G.J.,

Janssens-Maenhout

, G.,

Muntean

, M., Peters, J.A.H.W., 2016. Trends in global CO2 emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and Joint Research Centre.

Pei, W., Chen, Y., Sheng, K., Deng, W., Du, Y., Qi, Z., Kong, L., 2015. Temporal-spatial analysis and improvement measures of Chinese power system for wind power curtailment problem. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 49, 148–168. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.106

Qiu

, Y.,

Anadon

, L.D., 2012. The price of wind power in China during its expansion: technology adoption, learning-by-doing, economies of scale, and manufacturing localization. Energy Economics 34, 772–785. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2011.06.008

Ru P,

Zhi

Q, Zhang F,

Zhong

X, Li J, Su J (2012) Behind the development of technology: The transition of innovation modes in China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry.

Energy Policy

43

(C), 58–69. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.025.

Schuman, S., Lin, A., 2012. China’s Renewable Energy Law and its impact on renewable power in China: Progress, challenges and recommendations for improving implementation. Energy Policy 51, 89–109. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.066

Tang, T., Popp, D., 2014. The Learning Process and Technological Change in Wind Power: Evidence from China's CDM Wind Projects. NBER working paper.

Wang, F., Yin, H., Li, S., 2010. China’s renewable energy policy: Commitments and challenges. Energy Policy 38, 1872–1878. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.065

Yao, X., Liu, Y., Qu, S., 2015. When will wind energy achieve grid parity in China? – Connecting technological learning and climate finance. Applied Energy 160, 697–704. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.094

Yu, C.F., Van

Sark

, W.,

Alsema, E.A., 2011. Unraveling the photovoltaic technology learning curve by incorporation of input price changes and scale effects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 324–337. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.001

Zhao, Z.-Y., Chang, R.-D., Chen, Y.-L., 2016. What hinder the further development of wind power in China?—A socio-technical barrier study. Energy Policy 88, 465–476. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.004

23Slide24

Additional Slides

24Slide25

Wind patents by producers25

FirmYear FoundedOwnership structure

2015 Cumulative Capacity (MW)

EPO

USPTO

PCT/WIPO

Apps

Patents

Apps

Patents

Apps

Patents

Foreign

Goldwind

1998

SOE on stock exchange

31130

6

1

10

5

15

7

3

Sinovel

2006

SOE on stock exchange

16240

21

1

22

1

9

7

5

Guodian United Power

2007

SOE

14450

0

0

2

0

5

1

0

Dongfang

2004

SOE on stock exchange

10660

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mingyang

2006

Public

10110

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

Shanghai Electric

2004

SOE on stock exchange

7330

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

XEMC Windpower

2006

SOE

7040

19

6

2

1

4

0

4

Envision

2007

Private

6890

38

2

72

28

11

7

7

CSIC Chongqing

2004

SOE

5300

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

Windey (Yunda)

2001

SOE

4160

1

0

0

0

3

2

0

Total

 

 

 

85

10

108

35

58

25

19Slide26

Main Patenting Routes

26Slide27

Poisson Model

is estimated from observed characteristics:The log-likelihood is:

 

27Slide28

Negative Binomial

28Slide29

Results: Patent Citation Analysis

1981-2014

2004-2014

2002-2012

NB

Poisson

NB

Poisson

NB

Poisson

Germany

2.322***

2.300***

2.157***

2.168***

2.239***

2.221***

(0.297)

(0.292)

(0.284)

(0.284)

(0.305)

(0.298)

Japan

2.256***

2.251***

2.379***

2.353***

2.043***

2.052***

(0.303)

(0.303)

(0.326)

(0.323)

(0.287)

(0.287)

US

3.009***

3.078***

3.223***

3.234***

2.943***

2.979***

(0.392)

(0.403)

(0.430)

(0.433)

(0.407)

(0.411)

Denmark

1.658***

1.671***

1.674***

1.696***

1.577***

1.604***

(0.203)

(0.204)

(0.210)

(0.212)

(0.206)

(0.208)

ROW

2.530***

2.554***

2.548***

2.592***

2.387***

2.433***

(0.323)

(0.326)

(0.334)

(0.339)

(0.323)

(0.326)

Constant

0.000

0.000

0.140***

0.137***

0.109***

0.110***

0.000

0.000

(0.024)

(0.024)

(0.021)

(0.021)

Year Dummies

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Exposure

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Observations

3328

3328

2700

2700

2748

2748

Pseudo Log-likelihood

-7189.471

-9246.003

-6203.965

-7910.894

-6325.228

-8163.777

29Slide30

Results: Learning Rate

Variable(1)

(2)

(3)

 

Cumulative Capacity

-0.051***

-0.060***

-0.066***

 

(-0.012)

(0.008)

(0.007)

 

Plant’s load factor

-0.607***

 

(0.036)

 

Constant

-0.387***

-1.213

2.527***

 

(-0.131)

(0.099)

(0.074)

 

Year Effect

Y

Y

Y

 

Province Effect

Y

Y

Y

 

R-Squared

0.613

0.716

0.604

 

Observations

1477

1477

1477

 

*** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1

 

30

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

Capital Cost (

mRMB

/MW)

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

0.36

0.34

0.32

0.3

0.28

0.26

0.24

0.22

0.2

0.18

0.16

Capacity FactorSlide31

Learning Rate Estimation

31

 

C

t

=

aN

t

αSlide32

Global Solar PV Installation

32

SolarPower

Europe, 2015Slide33

Results: Technological Factors

StageKey FactorsPolysiliconInvestment and scaling up of production plants; hydrochloronation technology upgrade; increase number of seed rods in furnace; reduction in electricity use; investment in FBR technology

Ingot/Wafer

Seed-assisted growth method using crystalline Si and quartz;

diamond wire sawing

; larger

furnace and larger ingots;

black

Silicon; direct wafer

Cell

Improved efficiency; improved silver paste recipe; efficiency use of silver paste; higher number of

busbars

; high-efficiency cells (PERC/L/T, IBC, HIT)

Module

Domestic production and reduction of material use of key components (EVA sheets, glass,

backsheets

); replacement of TPT

backsheets

Equipment

Indigenization of equipment for

Al BSF;

automation; gradual domestication of key equipment for high-efficiency cells

33Slide34

Results: Technological Factors

StageKey FactorsPolysiliconInvestment and scaling up of production plants; hydrochloronation technology upgrade; increase number of seed rods in furnace; reduction in electricity use; investment in FBR technology

Ingot/Wafer

Seed-assisted growth method using crystalline Si and quartz;

diamond wire sawing

; larger

furnace and larger ingots;

black

Silicon; direct wafer

Cell

Improved efficiency; improved silver paste recipe; efficiency use of silver paste; higher number of

busbars

; high-efficiency cells (PERC/L/T, IBC, HIT)

Module

Domestic production and reduction of material use of key components (EVA sheets, glass,

backsheets

); replacement of TPT

backsheets

Equipment

Indigenization of equipment for

Al BSF

;

automation; gradual domestication of key equipment for high-efficiency cells

34Slide35

Thin Film TechnologiesThin film technologies most promising and can challenge silicon on efficiency and costAmorphous Si already ”out”

Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) and Copper-Indium-Gallium-Selenide (CIGS) most viableContinue to improve in efficiency and cost, though China not very active in this technology35Slide36

Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV)General skepticism toward CPV’s future viabilityCollapse of polysilicon price makes low concentrator PV less attractive

High concentrator PV uses high-efficiency multi-junction cells, but high system costsMay make sense in sunny region close to big load center with high electricity price 36Slide37

Excitonic and Perovskite37

Continued gain in efficiency for dye-sensitized solar cells and organic PV

Reliability issues

Perovskite most promising among emerging technologies

Efficiency up six times since introduction

Would not be commercially ready in the near futureSlide38

Trade Dispute: AD/CVD Tariffs TimelineSeptember 9, 2016

382011 2012 2013 2014 201510/2011: SolarWorld

filed complaint with the USDOC and USITC

10/2012: Final ruling from

DoC

for Chinese

cells

(23.75%–

254.66%)Slide39

Trade Dispute: Effects of US First Round TariffsSeptember 9, 2016

39Source: Yahoo! Finance

Final

USDoC

ruling: Oct 2012Slide40

Trade Dispute: AD/CDV Tariffs TimelineSeptember 9, 2016

402011 2012 2013 2014 201512/2013: US companies filed second petition

12/2014: Final ruling of the second round for Chinese wafers, cells, modules (23.74 –258.57%)Slide41

Trade Dispute: Effects of US Second Round TariffsSeptember 9, 2016

41Source: OSIRIS

Canadian Solar Sales

Sales (1,000s

USD)

2011

192,381

2012

254,097

2013

215,262

2014

604,537

2015

903,748

Jan 2015

Source

: Yahoo! FinanceSlide42

Trade Dispute: AD/CVD Tariff TimelineSeptember 9, 2016

422011 2012 2013 2014 201507/2012:

China launched an investigation

on US renewable energy program

01/2014: China’s final ruling on imported polysilicon from US (~55%) & South Korea (

2.4

% - 48.7

%)

12/2014: WTO decided US tariffs breached rulesSlide43

Source

: GTM Research & SEIA. “U.S. Solar Market Insight: Q1 2016.”Chinese anti-dumping tariffs enactedTrade Dispute: Effects of China Tariffs on Polysilicon

September 9, 2016

43Slide44

PV Mfgs. % of Sales Revenue by Region, 2015

PV manufacturers have varying degree of regional exposureThe majority of revenue from First Solar and Sunpower comes from the U.S. with virtually no penetration in the Chinese marketMany of the publicly traded Chinese companies have large, but no overwhelming revenues from their domestic market – demand could be coming from private companies

Shunfeng-Suntech generated 58% of its revenue in China in 2015

Note:

not all companies separate revenue into each geographic location represented in graphic. In those instances, all non-separated numbers are classified in “other” unless otherwise stated.

Sources

: Company figures based on Q4 ’15 (and previous) SEC filings by the respective companies. JA Solar and ReneSola have no filed their annual reports yet so 2014 numbers are reflected. Jinko Solar US numbers represent revenues the company received from all of “America” as U.S. was not broken out separately.

44Slide45

Trade Dispute: Recent DevelopmentsUS/EU organizations that have come out against the tariffsSolarPower

Europe (formerly European Photovoltaic Industry Association), representing 1.3 million European jobs and 130,000 European companies related to PVPV modules could be sold 20% cheaper in the EU without trade restrictions on Chinese panels, according to a study commissioned by Solar Alliance for Europe (SAFE)Australia canceled anti-dumping investigationsTrade uncertainties under the new administrationSeptember 9, 201645Slide46

Trade Dispute: Response from Chinese FirmsGo Big: build up international manufacturing capacityPros: develop

local production capacity in emerging markets; circumvent anti-dumping tariffsCons: tariffs may change to apply to cells/modules manufactured in SE Asia; challenges in developing local supply chainMaintain a Presence: acquisition in US/EU marketsPros: less risk; can obtain new tech manufacturing capabilityCons: limited ability to grow market presence; risks in acquision; no benefits of inexpensive SE Asian manufacturing Stay Home: focus on growing Chinese marketPros: Not subject to trade uncertainty; proximity to marketCons: lack of diversification; missing out on growing markets

September 9, 2016

46Slide47

What did experts miss before?-“People do not really understand the detailed operation of this industry and did not taking into consideration the contribution by China.”-The cost structure for crystalline Si is different.

“People may be familiar with electronics industry, but PV industry has a wider scope than just crystalline Si. Although the core component is crystalline Si, but it’s not the biggest part in terms of cost.” -Price of polysilicon-Scale of Chinese production -The domestic manufacturing and installation of equipment-The rush of private investment -Break up of polysilicon monopoly and partially the rate of technological improvement  -“They did not consider the manufacturing in China. Chinese and German investors would invest massively in manufacturing and lower the costs that fast. If the manufacturing had stayed in Germany, the price would have stayed at 4-5 dollars/W.” -Polysilicon supply increased; China broke up and decreased the monopolistic profits -Technological improvements: thinner wafer, thinner silver electrode, higher efficiency  -Wrong judgment on the scale of polysilicon material expansion

-Rapid improvement in efficiency thanks to technological improvements (equipment as well as other manufacturing processes)

-Economies of scale

47Slide48

CdTe

48Slide49

CIGS

49Slide50

OPV

50Slide51

Perovskite Solar Cell

51Slide52

Perovskite Structure

52Slide53

Probability of System Cost…

Expert<4RMB/W (%)>6RMB/W (%)A

100

0

B

100

0

D

95-100

0-5

F

95-100

0-5

G

50-60

0

H

20-40

0

I

30

0

K

90-100

0-5

L

80-90

10-20

O

40

25

53Slide54

The number of foreign patents awarded to Chinese inventors is increasing rapidly

Total number of USPTO patent grants 54Slide55

US firms aggressively patent their inventions in other major markets…

55Slide56

But the top 100 indigenous Chinese applicants patent only a small fraction of their inventions outside China

56Slide57

We are not the only ones who question the value of Chinese patent grantsBrian Wright and his students have found that Chinese indigenous inventors inflate their patent applications to meet local government targets…

…And to benefit from local government subsidies (Lei et al., 2015) Domestic patents of low quality can also be an asset in an evolving legal system that struggles to distinguish between a good patent and a bad patentThe number and growth rate of domestic patenting may (substantially) overstate the true innovation of indigenous Chinese firms57Slide58

Chinese domestic patent data suggest an explosion of innovation…

58Slide59

But the numbers of “true” patent grants (invention patents) are much smaller…

59Slide60

A significant fraction of Chinese invention patents are awarded to foreign inventors…

60Slide61

Indigenous firms allow their domestic patents to expire much earlier than foreign firms do

61