and Enhancement H325A120003 Panelists Rodrick Lucero AACTE V ice P resident for member engagement and support Rebecca Watts Ohio Department of Education Associate ID: 575153
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Programmatic Review" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Programmatic Review and Enhancement
H325A120003Slide2
Panelists
Rodrick Lucero, AACTE, Vice President for member engagement and support
Rebecca Watts, Ohio Department of Education,
Associate
Vice Chancellor of P-16
Initiatives,
Joyce Many, Georgia State University,
Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies and Educator
PreparationSlide3
National, State, and University PerspectiveSlide4
National Perspective
How can national efforts guide program review to support teacher and leader development? Slide5
Programmatic Review and EnhancementThe National LensSlide6
Programmatic ReviewLeveraging our collective expertiseOne field--one visionBy the field for the fieldSlide7
High Quality Programmatic ReviewModels exemplary pedagogical practiceBased on iterative cyclesSets the stage for Systemic ReflectionContinuous Improvement (feedback loops)
Space for conversation (meaning-making)Focus on improvement NOT complianceSlide8
Why Engage in Programmatic ReviewIt’s a professional obligation to reflect on our practiceA way to coalesce, massage, and grow our national narrativeA way to insure our commitment to high quality (PK-Gray)defines the process as “the work”, rather than the outcomeSlide9
Simply StatedThe national framework for programmatic review requires a look at the commonalities seen as indicators of high quality, profession-wide. These, as identified by the profession for the profession, become the unifying standards upon which a national program review system is built. The ongoing process of systemic reflection based on a philosophy of continuous improvement is the cornerstone upon which we make claims of quality. It is within this praxis we see the role of accreditation and program review. It is founded on our collective narrative, enacted by our collective belief in ongoing improvement, and emboldened by every learner we serve. Slide10
State Perspective How can a state department assist or build capacity for programmatic review leading to continuous improvement?
BE IN THE KNOW!Slide11
Programmatic Review and Enhancement
The Role of State AgenciesSlide12
Context
ContextSlide13
Federal requirements
Federal RequirementsSlide14
CAEP Standards
CAEP
StandardsSlide15
SPA Standards
SPA
StandardsSlide16
State requirements
State RequirementsSlide17
Innovation challenge
The Innovation and Enhancement
ChallengeSlide18
Programmatic Review and Enhancement Part 2
The Role of State AgenciesSlide19
University PerspectiveHow do EPPs motivate and engage faculty in programmatic review leading to continuous improvement?
BE IN THE KNOW!Slide20
Motivating and Engaging Faculty for Programmatic Review Leading To Continuous ImprovementJoyce ManyAssociate Dean, College of Education and Human DevelopmentGeorgia State UniversitySlide21
Engaging Faculty in Program Reform With CEEDAR Support: Georgia State University’s ApproachEstablishing our Focus
Our Day-Long Professional Education Faculty RetreatFollow Up Syllabi AnalysisContinuing the ConversationSlide22
Establishing Our FocusSlide23
Faculty retreatSlide24
Follow up workSlide25
Different eventsSlide26
Motivating and Engaging Faculty Acknowledge and Value Expertise
How Have you helped programs learn from others in your own backyard?Slide27
Motivating and Engaging Faculty Part 2Provide for Program Level Autonomy and Decision Making
How does this relate to your Experience?Slide28
Motivating and Engaging Faculty Part 3Adopt an Organic Approach to Program ReformSlide29
Diagram
Resources
Professional Development
Policies
and Procedures
Supportive Networks
Cooperating
Teachers
Faculty
Students
Supervisors
Grass Roots Experiential Learning and Input
Program and Course Design
Signature
Assignments
Assessments
Program Level Faculty Professional Development
Teacher Preparation Program Reform
Institutional, State, and National ContextSlide30
Motivating and Engaging Faculty Part 4Adopt an Organic Approach to Program Reform
What relationship do you see between resources, networks, professional development, and policies and the grass roots input and experiences of stakeholders at your institution?Slide31
Questions?