PPT-The Scientific Evidence for

Organism Regrowth in Treated Ballast Water What is meant by regrowth The regrowth of live organisms in the ballast tanks during the ballast journey to the extent that the numbers contained in the discharge water may well be above the IMO D2 discharge standards even though treatment had taken place at uptake. Natural. . Science. …it goes way beyond defying the “I before E except after C rule.”. Science. The body of knowledge about nature that represents the collective efforts, findings, insights, and wisdom of the human race.. in Evidence. CJ341 – Cyberlaw & Cybercrime. Lecture . #21. M. E. Kabay, PhD, CISSP-ISSMP. D. J. Blythe, JD. School of Business & Management. Topics. Admissibility of Digital Evidence. The Courts & Digital Evidence. Professor Guy Wellborn. Texas Rules of Evidence. Rule 702. Testimony by Experts. If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.. What Do You Think?. True of False. All scientists do experiments to get data.. A theory is unproven and lacks sufficient evidence to become a law. . Science and its methods can answer all questions.. What Is Science & Why Is It Important?. Scientific Method. Formulate a question. Develop a hypothesis. Experiment or gather data. Analyze data. Draw conclusions. Share results. Writing. Peer review. Elizabeth Gordon,. . NBCT. MYP & IB Biology Instructor. Me…. & You…. Middle School? High School?. Biology? Chemistry? Physics? Life Science?. My Dad’s a Space Alien. I . have evidence that proves . Natural. . Science. …it goes way beyond defying the “I before E except after C rule.”. Science. The body of knowledge about nature that represents the collective efforts, findings, insights, and wisdom of the human race.. The . Assertion-Evidence Approach. Michael Alley. College of Engineering. Pennsylvania State University. [Alley, 2013]. Slides . influence the preparation, delivery, and understanding of a scientific presentation. Case Files: Dr. . Coppolino’s. Deadly House Calls. ” . (page 28), then answer these questions:. Where did the Drs. Carl and Carmela . Coppolino. live? . ____________________________. Describe the manner in which William Farber was murdered (who/what/how): . Hypothesis, Theory, and law . How science really works. Objective. : Students will be able to explain what a scientific law and theory are and give examples of each.. Essential Question:. What are the differences between a scientific law and theory?. Evaluating the Evidence. Jane Campbell Moriarty. Carol Los . Mansmann. Chair in Faculty . Scholarshipand. . Professor of . Law. moriartyj@duq.edu. Duquesne University School of . Law. August 10, 2016. Crime Labs. Areas of Expertise. What constitutes Evidence?. Scientific Evidence in Court. Must be relevant to the case at hand. Must be more probative than prejudicial .  . Probative evidence:. . tending to prove a particular intention or to persuade you of the truth of an allegation . The . Frye. Standard. 1923, . Frye v. United States. Rejected the scientific validity of the polygraph (lie detector). Set a standard for admission of scientific evidence. The procedure, technique, or principle must be “generally accepted” by relevant scientific community. CHE 113. . 2. Learning Goals and Objectives. Today, the role of science in the courtroom is undisputed. We rely upon the scientific analysis and interpretation of key evidence to both exonerate and convict. But this hasn’t always been true in history. In this chapter an introduction to the role that forensic science has and does play in criminal justice is presented. Also, the legal underpinnings of the admissibility, use, and limitations of scientific evidence and testimony are explored. In this chapter, you will need to understand the following concepts:.