Area of Knowledge - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Area of Knowledge

Natural ScienceSlide2

…it goes way beyond defying the “I before E except after C rule.”Slide3
Slide4

ScienceThe body of knowledge about nature that represents the collective efforts, findings, insights, and wisdom of the human race.A human activity, with the functions of discovering the orderliness of nature and finding the causes that govern this order.Slide5

Henri Poincaré (1854-1912)

Science is built of facts, as a house is built of stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house.Slide6

Science

Process:

The Scientific Method

Known Information about Nature:

Scientific Laws and TheoriesSlide7

Scientific MethodRecognize a problemMake observations - Collect dataForm a hypothesis (must have a test for falseness)

Perform experimentsForm conclusions - TheorySlide8

Making observations (My car will not start.)

Suggesting a possible explanation, called a hypothesis, that is consistent with what has been observed ("My car will not start because it is out of fuel" - Hypothesis 1.)

Using the hypothesis to make predictions (If I add fuel to my car it will start.)

For Example:Slide9

Testing those predictions by experiments or further observations (Add fuel to the car and try to start it). ( Car still will not start).

"My car will not start because there is a fuel blockage" - Hypothesis 2

Modify the hypothesis in the light of new observations and results. Slide10

Use the hypothesis to make predictions (If I clean out the fuel line my car it will start.) Test those predictions by experiments or further observations.

Experiment: I clean out the fuel line and the car starts.

I conclude that my car wouldn’t start because its fuel line was clogged.Slide11

The Scientific Method (In the real world)Research - Experiments, Data, Conclusions, Supporting EvidenceSubmit to Scientific Journal

Journal submits paper to anonymous referees – peer reviewReferees study paper, make suggestions & judgementsRework paper as needed. Resubmit to JournalJournal Publishes Paper: Paper now “fair game”Slide12
Slide13

The test of all scientific knowledge and truth is experiment.

Richard FeynmanSlide14

Scientific inquiry differs from other human inquiry in the kind of evidence scientists pay attention to.

Scientific evidence must be replicable and falsifiable. It must be shared evidence and thus, independent of the inquirer’s personal and cultural perspectives.

It’s all about evidence!Slide15

We used to teach that scientific

evidence must be verifiable.

1902-1994

Falsifiability

The philosopher Karl Popper turned around this thinking arguing that the criterion is falsifiability. Slide16

Scientific evidence must be replicable and falsifiable.

Falsifiable

:

Capable of being shown to be not true. Refutable, Testable.

Replicable

:

Capable of being done by others, giving the same results

.Slide17

In a landmark 1993 decision, the U.S. Supreme court put it this way:

… the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability or testability”

“Scientific methodology today is based on generating hypotheses and testing them to see if they can be falsified; indeed this methodology is what distinguishes science from other fields of human inquiry… Slide18

Which of the following is a scientific statement?

1. There are forces in the universe that are undetectable and so we will never know about them.

2. The Universe is only 3 hours old, but was created to appear much much older. We were created with our memories intact.

3. The Earth is not exactly spherical, as it is actually a bit wider at the equator.Slide19

Hypotheses are educated guesses about what the answer might be, and can be useful throughout the inquiry.

Like evidence, they must be testable and relevant to the question being asked. If the test validates the guess, great… if not, the scientist faces a critical decision: give up on a favorite conviction or keep going.

Hypothesis Testing

Hypotheses are falsified when the evidence supporting them cannot be replicated.Slide20

Watson and Crick’s double helix is an example of a hypothesis. It was tested, and not falsified, by Rosalind Franklin’s x-ray diffraction observations.

Slide21

“It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong”

W. French Anderson -- the first scientist to cure a disorder through gene therapySlide22

"The great tragedy of Science:

the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis

by an ugly fact" Thomas Henry HuxleySlide23

Science

“

Look at the ideas themselves and judge them directly. Do not accept them on the basis of authority. Question, Question, Question, especially your own ideas. Look at problems from all angles. Try to determine what is wrong with your solution before someone else does.”

Richard FeynmanSlide24

A “Theory” is used in everyday English to mean hypothesis whereas in science it means something much stronger. Slide25

Theories, Facts, and Laws

In scientific terms, “

theory” does not mean “guess” or “hunch.” Scientific theories are explanations of natural phenomena built up logically from testable observations and hypotheses.Slide26

Theories are backed with solid data from many published scientific experiments, over time, that continue to support it as the best explanation thus far.

A theory can never be proven to be correct

.Slide27

Theories, Facts, and Laws

Scientists most often use the word “fact” to describe an observation. But scientists can also use fact to mean something that has been tested or observed so many times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing or looking for examples.Slide28

Theories, Facts, and Laws

Laws are generalizations that

describe phenomena. Whereas, theories explain phenomena.

For example:

Newton’s Law of Gravity

– describes how gravity behaves

Einstein’s Theory of Relativity

– explains how gravity works

Theories never become a laws.Slide29
Slide30
Slide31

In our present world, research scientists are fighting to reinforce to the non-scientific world that the “theory of global climate change” and the “theory of evolution” (to name two hot-topic theories) are not mere guesses or hunches, but explanations based on reliable data that should be taken seriously.

Global Climate Change

“It’s only a theory”Slide32

Everyone’s talking about global climage change… Should YOU be concerned?Slide33
Slide34

Climate change is one of the most critical global challenges of our time. Recent events have emphatically demonstrated our growing vulnerability to climate change. Climate naturally changes across geologic time, but the current RATE of change is unprecedented. The only thing in our computer models that can accurately explain this is the anthropogenic component (man-made emissions).Climate change impacts will range from affecting agriculture further endangering food security, sea level rise and accelerated erosion of coastal zones, increasing intensity of natural disasters, species extinction and the spread of tropical diseases (e.g. malaria).

…But if you don’t want to accept this “knowledge by authority,” then check out the empirical evidence on your own.Slide35

…Sea Level RiseSlide36

Why can’t climate scientists predict the future with greater certainty?Slide37

Just consider “simple” weather prediction… “Imagine a system on a rotating sphere that is 8000 miles wide, consists of different materials, different gases that have different properties (one of the most important of which, water, exists in different concentrations), heated by a nuclear reactor 93 million miles away. Then, just to make life interesting, this sphere is oriented such that as it revolves around the nuclear reactor, it is heated differently at different locations at different times of the year. Then, someone is asked to watch the mixture of gases, a fluid only 20 miles deep, that covers an area of 250 million square miles, and to predict the state of that fluid at one point on the sphere 2 days from now. This is the problem weather forecasters face.

” Robert T. Ryan. “The Weather is Changing… or Meteorologists and Broadcasters, the Twain Meet,”

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63, no. 3 (March 1982), 308.Slide38

“Science does not deal in certainty, so ‘fact’ can only mean a proposition affirmed to such a high degree that it would be perverse to withhold one’s provisional assent”

Stephen Jay GouldSlide39

Further complications…"A good model should be simple and it should exhibit the behaviors of the real system that interests us...it should suggest experimental tests of itself that are so revealing that we must eventually discard the model in favor of a better one. We therefore measure scientific progress by the production of better and better models, not by whether we find some absolute truth...“Truth is elusive, but we can gradually approximate it by creating better and better representations. There are at least two reasons why the truth is elusive in real systems...“The

universe is extremely complicated...second, we tend to change reality when we examine any system too closely. The disturbances that inevitably accompany all observations will change the thing being observed. Thus "truth" will be changed by the very act of looking for it...what is really important is the progress of the search, rather than some ultimate explanation that is probably unattainable anyway.“Excerpts from Mathematical Biology

by Shonkwiler, Ronald W.; Herod, James, published by Springer. pp. 1-8 Slide40

Science in the MoviesSlide41

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

“For all I know we may be visited by aliens every other Tuesday. Yet, the fact is, there is not a shred of hard physical evidence to support even a single visit. There’s often the reports of evidence, but never the evidence itself.”

Carl SaganSlide42

Pseudoscience

Astrology

Faith Healing Intelligent Design Dousing Creation Science Channeling Pyramid Power Crop Circles Etc.

Science

Physics

Chemistry

Biology

Geology

Astronomy

Etc.Slide43

We offer a one-million-dollar prize to anyone who can show, under controlled conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult power or event.

We do not involve ourselves in the testing procedure, other than to design the protocol and approving the conditions under which a test will take place. All tests are designed with the participation and approval of the applicant. In most cases, the applicant will be asked to perform a relatively simple preliminary test of the claim, which if successful, will be followed by the formal test.

Million Dollar PrizeSlide44

Million Dollar Prize

The only thing the JREF asks of you in defending your claim, is to

demonstrate

it. No theories, no stories, no anecdotal evidence, no photographs, no tape recordings; just a simple demonstration. Nothing more is required

Slide45

Preliminary tests are usually conducted by associates of the JREF at the site where the applicant lives. Upon success in the preliminary testing process, the "applicant" becomes a "claimant."

To date, (Prize Started in 1964) no one has ever passed the preliminary tests.

Million Dollar PrizeSlide46

Elementary Logic Errors:

An important part of scientific thinking is being able to recognize non-scientific thinking. Examples include…

Circular Reasoning:

Ralph Nader was the best candidate for president, because he was totally better than any of the others.

Slide47

If the mill were polluting the river we would see an increase in fish deaths.

Fish deaths have increased.

Thus, the mill must be polluting the river.

Non-sequitor

(it does not follow):

Elementary Logic Errors:

An important part of scientific thinking is being able to recognize non-scientific thinking. Examples include…Slide48

Non-sequitor

(it does not follow):

Abraham Lincoln is dead.

All Incas are dead.

Therefore, Abraham Lincoln is an Inca.

Elementary Logic Errors:

An important part of scientific thinking is being able to recognize non-scientific thinking. Examples include…Slide49

Ad hominem arguments:

(Against the Man)

Stem cell research is morally wrong, and the only reason you defend it is that you’re a godless atheist.

Elementary Logic Errors:

An important part of scientific thinking is being able to recognize non-scientific thinking. Examples include…Slide50

Do we get anything useful from science?

Should our research have an application, or do we do science for the sake of the knowledge alone??? Slide51

The really cool thing about science is how well it works!

(Science & technology)Slide52

But perhaps this is skewed…Slide53

Queen Anne

1665-1714

In the last 17 years of the 17

th

century (1683-1700) she was pregnant 18 times

Only 5 of these resulted in live births.

Only 1 of these 5 survived infancy…but he died before reaching adulthoodSlide54

“I am no witch. I am innocent. I know nothing of it.”

Bridget Bishop

Non-scientific thinking ending in tragedy:

Bridget Bishop Was the First to Go

…Salem 1692Slide55

Last State Executions for Witchcraft…

Holland 1610

England 1684

United States 1692France 1745Germany 1775

Poland 1793

Italy (Inquisition) 1816Slide56

“The only thing that stands between us and burning witches is science”

Carl SaganSlide57

Today, in the city of Kinshasa, the capital of the Congo, there are an estimated 25,000 homeless children. Sixty percent of them are homeless because they have been thrown out of their homes and branded as witches by their relatives.

L.A. Times 9/29/06Slide58

Science & Religion

The methods of science and religion are profoundly different. Religion frequently asks us to believe without question, even (or especially) in the absence of hard evidence. Indeed, this is the central meaning of faith. Science asks us to take nothing on faith, to be wary of self-deception, to reject anecdotal evidence. Science considers deep skepticism a prime virtue. Religion often sees it as a barrier to enlightenment.Slide59

“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use.”

GalileoSlide60

All our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike --- and yet, it is the most precious thing we have.

Albert Einstein (1879-1955)Slide61

But can we ever know it all???Slide62

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle explained… Slide63

But can science even attempt to explain everything that is important?