/
Virtuous Violence Part 2 Virtuous Violence Part 2

Virtuous Violence Part 2 - PowerPoint Presentation

popsmolecules
popsmolecules . @popsmolecules
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-17

Virtuous Violence Part 2 - PPT Presentation

Fiske amp Rai 2015 Pleasing Gods Human and animal sacrifice Selfsacrifice Religion and Morality McKay amp Whitehouse 2015 2 nd look at theory Morality the intentions motivations evaluations and conjoined emotions that operate to realize ideal models of social relationshi ID: 779964

amp torture moral rape torture amp rape moral theory morality arguments pragmatic participants explain masculinity control relationships bandura vvt

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Virtuous Violence Part 2" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Virtuous Violence Part 2

Fiske & Rai, 2015

Slide2

Pleasing Gods

Human and animal sacrifice

Self-sacrifice

Slide3

Religion and Morality

(McKay & Whitehouse, 2015)

Slide4

2nd

look at theory

Morality = “the intentions, motivations, evaluations, and conjoined emotions that operate to realize ideal models of social relationships in a culturally meaningful manner” (p. 135)

Why do humans need morality?

What determines whether an action is “moral”?

Is morality automatic or controlled?How does VVT incorporate other theories of violence based on personality, etc.?

Proximate vs. ultimate causes

Slide5

Are killers….

Evil?

Rational?

Impulsive?

Self-control/regulation theories (e.g., Dollard et al., 1939;

Finkel; Baumeister)Morally disengaged?

Bandura

Table 10.1 (p. 160)

What types of things does VVT not explain? What other theories cover those areas?

Could VV theory be used as an argument in a trial? 

Slide6

Bandura, Barbaranelli

,

Caprara

, &

Pastorelli, 1996

Slide7

Social Connection Enables Dehumanization

(Waytz & Epley, 2012; Experiment 4)

59 participants from Chicago population

Randomly assigned to arrive with a friend or arrive alone

Received packet with 11 faces, “of terrorists responsible for plotting the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center that killed thousands of U.S. citizens,” completed moral disengagement scale (Bandura et al., 1996),

and willingness

to endorse human

harm questions

(

5)

In the connection condition (with a friend), participants dehumanized detainees and endorsed harming them more than participants in the control condition

Slide8

IPV

How is IPV seen as “moral”?

Slide9

Rape

What are the major motivators of rape, according to the authors?

What is a problem with knowing the causes of rape?

Thornhill & Palmer,

Natural History of Rape

, 2000 According to VV theory, would the recent #metoo

movement reduce rape and sexual assaults, or further upset AR relationships (e.g., between men and women)? 

Slide10

The Dark Side of Men: The Nature of Masculinity and Its

Uneasy Relationship With

Male Rape

(Javaid, 2015)

Literature Review

Pressure to

fulfill

expected identities

Even if it may clash with inner beliefs, emotions, and behavior

Heterosexualtiy is superior to homosexuality

Perpetrator executes power and control, asserts hegemonic masculinity

Victim is humiliated, degraded, and his masculinity is weakened, which strengthens the perpetrator

AR, CS relationships

Slide11

Hazing and initiation rites

How do F&R explain hazing?

Aronson & Mills, 1959—is this an alternative, or does it fit with VVT?

What initiation rites do we have in our culture?

Waldron et al., 2011 (p. 182)

Is FGM violence? MGM?

Slide12

Torture

How does the theory explain torture

?

On

page 195, "

Farid's previous history of terrorist acts was a slightly better predictor of support for torture than the likelihood of his providing useful information." Do you think this is parallel to how prisoners are viewed, and why it is hard for them to be integrated back into society after being released from prison? 

Slide13

The Effects of Moral and Pragmatic Arguments Against Torture on Demands for Judicial Reform

(Leidner, Kardos, and Castano 2018; Study 1)

Compare moral and pragmatic arguments against torture

Moral: torture violates human rights

Pragmatic: torture does not work

191 participants from Craigslist

Read fictitious news article, demands for justice (measure), and manipulation checks

Moral arguments against torture resulted in stronger demands for redressing injustice of torture compared to pragmatic or no arguments

Slide14

Murder

How does the theory explain murder?

School shootings?

Shootings by those suffering from mental illnesses?

Slide15

Group projects

Why do scientists work in groups?

What are some pitfalls to watch out for?

How can you work most effectively in a group?

How can you deal with the pitfalls?

Discuss with your group