/
ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment Committee ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment Committee

ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment Committee - PowerPoint Presentation

quinn
quinn . @quinn
Follow
64 views
Uploaded On 2024-01-29

ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment Committee - PPT Presentation

Chicago Illinois ASTA CSS Expo Dave Carey Executive Director Status of Seed Treatments in Canada Key Issues and Updates PMRA ReEvaluations Ontario Neonicotinoid Regulations Quebec Proposed Regulations ID: 1043152

2018march usescancel pmra seed usescancel 2018march seed pmra working corn 2018june pest proposed clothianidin environment group neonicotinoid 2017 mitigation

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment Comm..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. ASTA Seed Treatment and Environment CommitteeChicago, Illinois ASTA CSS ExpoDave Carey, Executive Director

2. Status of Seed Treatments in Canada

3. Key Issues and UpdatesPMRA Re-EvaluationsOntario Neonicotinoid RegulationsQuebec Proposed Regulations

4. PMRA Re-Evaluations3 primary work streams:“Original 401”Pre-1995 chemistriesExamples include Bravo (chlorothalonil); Lorsban (chlorpyrifos)Cyclical re-evaluationsPost-1995 chemistriesExamples include Matador (λ-cyhalothrin); Admire (Imidacloprid); Poncho (clothianidin)Special reviews:OECD bans and/or new dataExamples include Poncho (clothianidin)

5. PMRA Re-Evaluations“Original 401”: 35 still to be finishedCyclical:Currently 74 369 to be initiated between 2018 and 2028Special reviews:Currently 23UnpredictablePMRA was strongly criticized by CESD in 2015 for not making adequate progress…

6. PMRA Re-Evaluation Issues Few opportunities to engage key stakeholdersRegistrantsGrowersProvincial specialistsAcademicsNo opportunity to refine risk assessment before PRVD publishedAdditional dataRefine assumptionsCheck for errorsMinimal alignment with global regulatory partners

7. Recent Proposed DecisionsActive ingredientMancozebGroup MMetiramGroup MFerbamGroup MZiramGroup MThiramGroup MChlorothalonilGroup MIprodioneGroup 2CaptanGroup MCypermethrinGroup 3ImidaclopridGroup 4Λ-cyhalothrinGroup 3Trade NameDithanePolyramFerbamZiramThiramBravoRovralCaptanRipcordAdmireMatadorStatusMarch 2018March 2018June 2018June 2018June 2018March 2018March 2018March 2018Sept 2018Dec 2018March 2019Proposed decisionCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel certain uses; limit restCancel all usesCancel certain uses; limit restFewer applicationsCancel all ag usesCancel most uses

8. Recent Proposed DecisionsActive ingredientMancozebGroup MMetiramGroup MFerbamGroup MZiramGroup MThiramGroup MChlorothalonilGroup MIprodioneGroup 2CaptanGroup MCypermethrinGroup 3ImidaclopridGroup 4Λ-cyhalothrinGroup 3Trade NameDithanePolyramFerbamZiramThiramBravoRovralCaptanRipcordAdmireMatadorStatusMarch 2018March 2018June 2018June 2018June 2018March 2018March 2018March 2018Sept 2018Dec 2018March 2019Proposed decisionCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel all usesCancel certain uses; limit restCancel all usesCancel certain uses; limit restFewer applicationsCancel all ag usesCancel most uses

9. Overview of PMRA Re-Evaluation of NeonicsActive IngredientPollinator Re-evaluation Targeted Re-evaluation initiated by PMRA(Environment only)Cyclical Re-evaluationPCPA s.16(2)(Human Health & Environment)Special ReviewPCPA s.17(1)(Environment only)ImidaclopridPreliminary risk assessment: REV2016-05PRVD – Early 2018PRVD2016-20 excluded pollinatorsRVD (excluding pollinators) – December 2018–ClothianidinPRVD – December 2017PRVD (excluding pollinators)– May 2019PRVD on aquatic invertebrates – May 2018ThiamethoxamPRVD – December 2017PRVD (excluding pollinators)– May 2019PRVD on aquatic invertebrates – May 2018

10. AAFC Multi-Stakeholder ForumNovember, 2016: PMRA held a call with stakeholders to announce their proposed decision to cancel the registration of imidaclopridDecember, 2016: AAFC held the 1st in person meeting of the ‘Mutli-Stakeholder Forum on Neonicotinoids’ in Ottawa“The objective is to provide a forum for stakeholders to meet and exchange evidence-based knowledge and information related to neonicotinoids.”It became clear that there were data gaps and missing information. Industry and government struck three working groups to complete projects to feed back into PMRA’s final decision

11. AAFC Multi-Stakeholder ForumEnvironmental Monitoring Working GroupAlternatives Working Group*Mitigation Working Group*Work Plans were presented at the February 2017 Forum meetingDeliverables and timelines were discussed*CSTA is a working group member

12. Mitigation Working GroupThe Mitigation Working Group focused on 3 core deliverable projectsVegetative Strips/Buffer ZonesSeed TreatmentsGreenhousesWhitepapers on each of these projects were to be submitted to PMRA by end of October 2017

13. Seed Treatment PaperCSTA was tasked/voluntold to oversee the development of a seed treatment paper that characterizes why farmers use seed treatments CSTA contracted Dr. Paul Mitchell and Dr. Shawn Conley of AgInfomatics to prepare the report: “Benefits of Seed Applied Technologies to Canadian Farmers”It is a scientific document written for a lay audience that explores some of the major reasons why Canadian farmers use neonicotinoids and some projections of how they would respond if neonicotinoids were not available

14. Seed Treatment PaperThe paper was submitted to PMRA by the Chair of the Mitigation Working Group (Deb Conlon, Grain Farmers of Ontario) at the end of OctoberAvailable online at: http://cdnseed.org/news-meetings/news/ and was distributed via Trade Winds

15. Ontario Neonicotinoid Regulations

16. Ontario Neonic RegulationsNeonic treated corn and soybean seed considered a Class 12 PesticideOntario Aspirational Goal of 80% reduction in treated corn and soybean acres by 2017Reduce Overwintering losses to 15% by 2020Update as of July 2017:Actual 24% Reduction in 20162017 Vendor Reports submitted by October 2017“Can have 100% compliance and not reach aspirational goalOverwintering loss goal reached in 2016

17. Ontario Neonic RegulationsOntario August 31, 2017 and beyond: By county 3rd Party Professional Pest Advisor AssessmentRequired every 3 yearsSelf assessment in alternative yearsFungicide only – no paperworkFungicide and alternative insecticide – no paperworkThird Party Professional Pest Assessor:Can be a CCA or Professional AgrologistAs long as not deriving majority of income from the sale of a neonicotinoid pesticide

18. 18Professional Pest Advisor – Implementation by County

19. Quebec Proposed Regulations

20. QuebecPesticides Management Code:Application of atrazine, chlorpyrifos, thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, and clothianidin for agricultural uses only permitted with the prior approval of a certified agronomist; specifically the planting of neonicotinoid-treated corn, oat, wheat, canola, barley or soybean seedsEstablishes a new class of pesticide (3A) to capture every pesticide that coats a seed of oats, wheat, canola, grain corn, forage corn, sweet corn, barley or soybean that contains one or more of clothianidin, imidacloprid or thiamethoxam

21. QuebecProhibits the sale of neonics to consumers and commercial users for applications on grassRequire detailed reporting from farmers and retailers on the use and sales of the restricted productsDatePesticidesDate of coming into force of this regulationClass 1 to Class 3 pesticides containing atrazine1 September 2018Class 3A pesticides1 April 2019Class 1 to Class 3 pesticides containing chlorpyrifos, clothianidin, Imidacloprid or thiamethoxam.

22. Quebec Key Takeaways Failure to acknowledge and accept the expertise of Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) in registering products for sale or use in Canada that are safe for human health and the environment;Failure to acknowledge the significant contribution that certain pesticides have made to sustainable agricultural production or their important role in Integrated Pest Management (IPM);

23. QuebecCSTA consulted with key partners:CropLife CanadaAMSQ (Quebec Seed Trade Association)RegistrantsQuebec Grain GrowersCSTA and AMSQ developed a joint submission that focused on the science, difficulty of implementation, etcWorking with a coalition, led by CropLife Canada to address issues at both the federal an provincial levels

24.