Colin Vize MSPurdue UniversityObjective Antagonism vs Agreeableness is a personality domain commonly uncludedin hierarchal models of maladaptive personality Given its strong ties to interpersonal thou ID: 870632
Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Antagonism in Daily Life" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1 Antagonism in Daily Life Colin Vize
Antagonism in Daily Life Colin Vize , MS (Purdue University)* Objective: Antagonism (vs. Agreeableness) is a personality domain commonly uncluded in hierarchal models of maladaptive personality. Given its strong ties to interpersonal thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, it is unsurprising that Antagonism - related traits have emerged as the most robust correlates of various antisocial behaviors such as aggression. Nonetheless, much of the work focused on Antagonism is cross - sectional and/or descriptive in nature. Data that provide insights into Antagonism - related processes are needed to better understand how Antagonism may increase the propensity to act in antisocial ways. Method: The current study made use of ecological momentary sampling techniques to explore how Antagonism functions in daily life. Participants (N = 386) completed initial baseline questionnaires and a one - week ambulatory assessment (AA) protocol, which was designed to specifically assess interpersonal interactions. Using multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM), we explored how CAT - PD - Antagonism related to various interpersonally relevant processes, including perceptions of ot hers and positive and negative affect during interpersonal interactions. Results: Results showed that CAT - PD - Antagonism was related to various interpersonal processes and moderated the relationship between perceptions of others and subsequent affect du ring interpersonal interactions. Facet - level analyses (e.g., CAT - PD - Callousness, CAT - PD - Hostile Aggression) shed further light on the results found for the broader domain. Conclusion: Taken together, the results highlight the importance of using EMA me thods to better understand Antagonism - related processes. Furthermore, our results highlight that the greater specificity offered by facet - level scales can help clarify relations found at the domain level. Learning Objectives At the conclusion of th e presentation, participants will be able to: 1. Discuss measurement invariance in the IPO across race and ethnicity. 2. Recognize possible cultural implications in personality measurement. 3. Identify gaps in the literature on personality and culture. References: 1. Igarashi, H., Kikuchi, H., Kano, R., Mitoma, H., Shono, M., Hasui, C., & Kitamura, T. (2009). The Inventory of Personality Organisation: Its psychometric properties among student and clinical populations in Japan. Annals of General Psychiatry, 8 2. McLean, K. C., Lilgendahl, J. P., Fordham, C., Alpert, E., Marsden, E., Szymanowski , K., & McAdams, D. P. (2018). Identity development in cultural context: The role of deviating from master narratives. Journal of Personality, 86(4), 631 – 651. 3. Preti, E., Prunas, A., De Panfilis, C., Marchesi, C., Madeddu, F., & Clarkin, J.F. (2015). The facets of identity: Personality pathology assessment through the Inventory of Personality Organization. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(2), 129 - 140.