/
Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 25 2015 Sanctions Case No 375 I Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 25 2015 Sanctions Case No 375 I

Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 25 2015 Sanctions Case No 375 I - PDF document

roy
roy . @roy
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2021-09-10

Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 25 2015 Sanctions Case No 375 I - PPT Presentation

contract financially or in any other manner to be a contractor consultant manufacturer or supplier or service provider otherwise eligible firm being awarded a Bankfinanced iii to receive the proceeds ID: 878898

sanctions bank sanction notice bank sanctions notice sanction debarment procedures group sdo recommended proceedings board guidelines period respondent accordance

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 2..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 2
Notice Sanctions Proceedings September 25, 2015 Sanctions Case No. 375 IBRD Loan (Albania Irrigation International Epirotic Construction and Trading SA June Bankand Debarment Officer (the a Notice contract, financially or in any other manner, to be a contractor, consultant, manufacturer or supplier, or service provider otherwise eligible firm being awarded a Bank-financed (iii) to receive the proceeds loan made by the Bank or otherwise to participate further in the preparation or implementation project or program financed by the Bank and governed by the Bank's Procurement Guidelines, Consultant Guidelines or Anti-Corruption Guidelines; provided, after a minimum period (3) years, D.I. TE. may be only TE. has, in accordance with Section Sanctions to the Bank Group's Integrity Compliance Officer that D.I. complied with the following conditions: (a) D.I. TE. has taken appropriate remedial measures to address the sanctionable practices D.I. been sanctioned; and (b) D.I.TE. has adopted and implemented

2 an effective integrity compliance progra
an effective integrity compliance program in a manner satisfactory to this sanction, the SDO took into account, as an aggravating factor, D.I. TE. pattern that fraudulent documentation in three different bids over a one-month period. The SDO also took into account, as a mitigating factor, INT's representations as to the extent TE. during the course invin particular that D.I. INT's show cause the falsity documin question and declaration will extend across the operations Bank Group, including and the guarantee Bank. will also provide notice For a a biddinor into an or ama to manufacturer or on bidding by in application or knoBank 23-24 funds to 2 declaration to the other multilateral banks ("MDBs") that are party to the Agreement Enforcement Decisions (the "MDB Cross-Debarment so that they may determine whether to enforce the declarations with respect to their own operations in accordance with the MDB Cross­ Debarment Agreement and their own policies and procedures. 4 Respondent did not submit a wr

3 itten Explanation (as defined in the San
itten Explanation (as defined in the Sanctions Procedures) in accordance with Section 4.02(b) Sanctions Procedures. Sanctions Procedures provides that respondent does not contest the accusations or the sanction recommended by the SDO in a Notice Proceedings by submitting a Response (as defined in the Sanctions Procedures) to the World Bank Group Sanctions Board (the "Sanctions Board") within ninety (90) days after delivery Notice Proceedings, the sanction(s) recommended by the SDO shall enter immediately into Response having been submitted to the Sanctions Board by the Respondent within the specified period, INT's accusation in the SAE and the sanction recommended by the SDO in the Notice are deemed uncontested for purposes 4.04 Sanctions the recommended sanction set forth in paragraph 4 above has entered into force as date hereof. Pascale Helene Dubois Chief Suspension and Debarment Officer Office and Debarment (OSD) The World Bank at 2 Bank Group, Bank, and and Bank Group. Crosto MDB (i) or abou