PPT-The U.S. Approach to Sanctions
Author : alexa-scheidler | Published Date : 2018-01-06
Joseph J Dehner For the UIA Congress October 2016 jdehnerfbtlawcom US Sanctions Tool to promote national security US President may impose economic sanctions International
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The U.S. Approach to Sanctions" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
The U.S. Approach to Sanctions: Transcript
Joseph J Dehner For the UIA Congress October 2016 jdehnerfbtlawcom US Sanctions Tool to promote national security US President may impose economic sanctions International Emergency Economic Powers Act IEEPA. Because the world is a big place. 3 Big types of motions. 1. Incentives/Intervention in countries. 2. Rules of war/International justice. 3. Point of View debate. 1. Incentives and intervention. These motions are based around trying to get countries or groups within countries to do things. Sanctions”. Presented by The Bahamas Association of Compliance Officers (BACO). Understanding Sanctions . Yolanda M. Hilton. Compliance Director/MLRO. Intertrust. (Bahamas) Limited. Enforcing AML Compliance with sanctions. AWARENESS EVENT. 24. th. April 2015. Questions about sanctions. Gaps in Help. Introduction. Current sanctions regime introduced 2012. Welfare Reform Event September 2013. Stockton Welfare Advice Network October 2013. Helping clients cope with the priorities when benefit is stopped due to Sanctions. 635795 adverse sanctions decisions were made across the UK 21% of whom identified themselves as “disabled” Oct – Sept 2014. Identify how norms are enforced. How are norms upheld?. What is internalization?. Internalization: process by which a norm becomes a part of an individuals personality, thus conditioning that individual to conform to society’s expectations. Replicating the Concepts Behind . Project HOPE. Dionne Addison and Stephanie Starr, Grant Administrators. Sonya Dunlap, Project Coordinator. What is “Swift and Certain” Sanctions?. HOPE has the most name recognition. Compliance: International Travel and Shipping. Dan Runge. Export Compliance . Officer (ECO). BSAG Meeting. 6. December . 2017. UGA’s Office of Export Control. Timeline. Late 2012 to Early 2013 - . Jason . Prince. Important Information. This presentation is similar to any other seminar designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made and any materials distributed as part of this presentation are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the speakers. This presentation is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.. EMBARGOES. Wednesday, . October 9. th. , 2013. 1. :00pm . – 2. :00pm. BORIS POPULOH. Sr. Vice President. Willis Relocation Risk Group. What Are . Sanctions. Who Issues . Sanctions. Sanctions Type & Scope. Developed by:. Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D.. Presented by:. Carolyn Hardin, Senior Director. . . . Positive . Reinforcement. . Negative . Reinforcement. . Punishment . . . Shannon M. Carey, Ph.D.. Based on a Need to Know Fact Sheet by . Doug Marlowe, J.D. Ph.D./. NDCI. Purpose. What is the purpose of Sanctions?. What is the purpose of Incentives?. What other court responses are there?. Trust*Respect*Accountability*Integrity*Leadership. Why have Alternative Sanctions?. There is no evidence that “punishment/incarceration” works in reducing future . crime. Reducing Recidivism. Future violations are prevented when there is little time delay between behavior and response.. RECOMMENDATIONDefendants motion for sanctions Doc 24 should be granted The court should enter anorder striking plaintiffs complaint and dismissing this action with prejudiceA copy of this report and also contained the evidence gathered by INT in support of these accusations 3 The specific accusations made by INT in the SAE were that the Respondent i engaged in a fraudulent practice by submitting
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"The U.S. Approach to Sanctions"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents