/
Access to Higher Education in Wales: devolution, social democracy and equity Access to Higher Education in Wales: devolution, social democracy and equity

Access to Higher Education in Wales: devolution, social democracy and equity - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
357 views
Uploaded On 2018-09-30

Access to Higher Education in Wales: devolution, social democracy and equity - PPT Presentation

Gareth Rees Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research Data and Methods WISERD SRHE seminar 16 February 2016 Overview Provide an account of the policy framework developed by the Welsh Government for higher education ID: 683747

higher education social access education higher access social wales government policy welsh pupils participate widening areas deprived democratic fees

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Access to Higher Education in Wales: dev..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Access to Higher Education in Wales: devolution, social democracy and equity

Gareth Rees

Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD)

SRHE seminar,

16 February 2016Slide2

Overview

Provide an account of the policy framework developed by the Welsh Government for higher education.

Assess some of the implications of this framework for patterns of access to higher education.

Reflect on the implications for ‘social democratic’ strategies for the provision of higher education.Slide3

The Devolved Policy Framework in Wales

The Welsh Government has pursued policies on higher education that are distinctive from those in the other UK countries:

Student finance: fees subsidy; maintenance grants and loans;

Widening access initiatives: regulated through universities’ fee plans; focused on areas of social disadvantage;

Dirigiste

approach to institutional restructuring: overall pattern of provision; institutional mergers; further education-higher education relationships;

Organisation of research activities to meet government aims, especially economic development.Slide4

A ‘Social Democratic Consensus’

These policies reflect a broadly

social democratic

agenda.

This is reflected most clearly in the subsidisation of student fees, justified

in terms of:

Social equity;

Planning rather than the market.

There is substantial consensus across the party political spectrum in support of this sort of approach.

However, there are also increasing concerns about the effects and viability of the policy:

Diamond Review;

Welsh Government budget for 2016-2017.Slide5

Is Access to Higher Education More Equitable?

There is some evidence that Wales-domiciled entrants to higher education are drawn from a somewhat wider range of social backgrounds than elsewhere in the UK.

However, it is very difficult to attribute these limited differences to the effects of policy interventions (either the fees regime or widening access initiatives).

More generally, WISERD research suggests that the determinants of access to higher education by Wales-domiciled young people are broadly equivalent to those for their English-domiciled peers. Slide6

Participation in HE by age 20

Males

Females

Overall

30.3%

38.7%

Eligible for free school

meals

12.0%

15.4%

Not known to be eligible33.3%42.5%200528.6%35.8%200731.1%39.8%

Educational achievement (particularly at age 15) is the greatest determinant of participation to HE

GCSE pointsParticipation in HE by age 200-202.6%21-305.2%31-4012.5%41-5029.3%51-6055.6%>6081.7%Slide7

But once we take account of levels of

attainment,

what other factors are associated with participation

in higher education?

Female pupils

eligible for free school meals

are 21% less likely to participate in

higher education

than equivalent non-FSM female pupils (for males this figure is 12% less likely)

Male ‘

non-White

British’ pupils are 2½ times more likely to participate than male White British pupils

Males and females are 6.7% and 7.5% (respectively) less likely to participate if they live in the most deprived areas of Wales compared to equivalent young people in the least deprived areas

Young

people living in the

fourth quintile of most deprived

are less likely to participate than those in the 20% most deprived areas – the effect of

Communities First

policy for

widening access?Slide8

Schools

But there are other important

institutional

effectsSlide9

Tensions within Social Democratic Approaches to Access

T

hese limited impacts reflect the restrictions imposed by the nature of the devolution settlement itself: the challenge of responsibility without real power?

The Welsh example illustrates the tensions that are inherent in ‘social democratic’ approaches to access to higher education.

As well as widening access strategies, the Welsh Government has implemented the Seren Programme, intended to increase entry to Oxbridge and other ‘elite’ universities.

This reflects significant ambiguities in the ideals of

equity

that are being sought and the nature of the

merit

that is thereby rewarded. Slide10

Type of University by Communities First area