PPT-Assessing Critical Thinking and Quantitative Reasoning in
Author : sherrill-nordquist | Published Date : 2015-11-18
MA 103 Gerald Kruse and David Drews Juniata College Huntingdon PA krusejuniataedu drewsjuniataedu Outline of Status ReportMentoring Session History Experimental
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Assessing Critical Thinking and Quantita..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Assessing Critical Thinking and Quantitative Reasoning in: Transcript
MA 103 Gerald Kruse and David Drews Juniata College Huntingdon PA krusejuniataedu drewsjuniataedu Outline of Status ReportMentoring Session History Experimental Design Data Tentative. Trial & Error. Ginny Price, MS, CVT, VTS (Behavior). St Petersburg College. Veterinary Technology Program, AS. Measure first. First day of class measured critical thinking using ARC & a scenario I wrote. and the Education of . Psychologically Literate . Citizens. Diane F. Halpern and Heather A. Butler. Claremont McKenna College. The Need for Psychological Literacy. It’s a complex and . t. echnical world. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/excellence-e-learning-asking-right-questions-ken-turner-lion-?trk=hb_ntf_MEGAPHONE_ARTICLE_POST. Critical thinking. Critical Thinking. Critical thinking has to do with evaluating information and determining . Reasoning . in the Era of Competency-based Medical . Education, Milestones and Entrustment . Preventing Diagnostic . Error. “. We’re pretty sure it’s the. . West Nile virus.”. Clinical Reasoning: A Primer. Task Force. Final Report. 15 September . 2016. Guiding Principle: . Educational Policy must balance access and opportunity to achieve equity.. Recommendation I. Define quantitative reasoning. Recommendation I. Matt . Grayson, . Josh Leonard, . & Denise . Drane. Support . for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s TUES Program: grant 942404. .. Overarching Questions. What is critical thinking?. Al-. Bakri. (201000686). Aisha . Al_khaldi. (200600344). Lama Al-. bassam. (200901512). Standards Critical Thinking. Assessment 1 . Chapter. . 7. OF. Outline . The standards of thinking . Taking a deeper look at the universal intellectual standards. Trial & Error. Ginny Price, MS, CVT, VTS (Behavior). St Petersburg College. Veterinary Technology Program, AS. Measure first. First day of class measured critical thinking using ARC & a scenario I wrote. Questions Drive Thinking. Write down the most important question you have right now.. The mind is its own place. In itself, it can make a hell of a heaven or a heaven of a hell.. -John Milton. My Students …. A. E. S. School of Advanced Studies. What is AES?. An iterative process for success . in the ACCESS sequence. What is AES?. By understanding AES you will be able to:. Prepare your papers more effectively. Daniel Fasko, Jr., Ph.D.. Definition of Critical Thinking. Critical Thinking Skills. Critical Thinking Dispositions. Instructional Strategies. Assessment Techniques. Review of Samples of Syllabi. Overview. Bonnie Paller, context. Joel Krantz, CTVA . Marquita Pellerin, PAS. Kristina Meshelski, Philosophy. Weimin. Sun, Philosophy. Building Critical Thinking Assignment Prompts . Bonnie Paller. AALC Retreat 2014. . Strategies to Challenge Students’ Minds. Gem Thomerson, . Ed.D. .. gthomerson@dorchester2.k12.sc.us. SEED-y Thinking. Higher-order thinking. requires students to manipulate information and ideas in ways that transform their meaning and implications. Presented by Dr. John Willems. Sponsored . by the Committee for the Assessment of Student . Learning (CASL). How does EIU measure up?. CLA+ RESULTS – Quantitative Reasoning: In AY 2018, CASL administered the CLA+ exam to 84 freshmen and 89 senior students. The mean score in quantitative reasoning for EIU freshmen was 67 points lower than the National Average for freshmen while the mean scores for EIU seniors was 27 points lower than the National Average for seniors Although there is a much larger gain of 87 made by EIU seniors than the National Average gain of 47, EIU seniors still graduate with significantly less skill in this area than the national average. .
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Assessing Critical Thinking and Quantitative Reasoning in"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents