/
Bayesian modelling Bayesian modelling

Bayesian modelling - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
386 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-17

Bayesian modelling - PPT Presentation

hevruta Introduction Bayesian modelling in the recent decade Lee amp Wagemakers 2013 Some tentative plans Today A general introduction Session 2 Handson introduction into ID: 596851

data bayesian great hevruta bayesian data hevruta great analysis 100 prior modelling beliefs likelihood meeting bayes posterior that

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Bayesian modelling" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Bayesian modelling hevruta

IntroductionSlide2

Bayesian modelling in the recent decade

Lee &

Wagemakers

(2013)Slide3

Some tentative plans

Today – A

general introduction

Session 2 – Hands-on introduction into

Bayesian modelling software

Session 3 – Introduction into

Bayesian data analysis

Session 4 – Introduction into

Bayesian modelling

Session 5(optional) – A few advanced issues (e.g. Hierarchical Bayes)

Session 6 onward –

Your part.

How does that sounds?

Meetings frequency? Monthly? Bi-weekly? First Bi-weekly then monthly?Slide4

Bayes theorem and beliefs

E.g. What are the chances you will think it’s an interesting

Hevruta

after today? (B – great

hevruta

! ; D – liked the first meeting)

Great

Hevruta

Sounds boring…

Liking the first meeting

Liking the first meeting

Not liking it

Not liking it

 

 

8

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Given that you liked the first meeting -> the chances you’d think it’s a great

Hevruta

are now 0.67

You can also say that one will be 67% certain of his belief that this is a great

Hevruta

Likelihood

Prior

DataSlide5

Bayes theorem and beliefs

E.g. What are the chances you will think it’s an interesting

Hevruta

after today? (B – great

hevruta

! ; D – liked the first meeting)

Great

Hevruta

Sounds boring…

Liked the first meeting

Liked the first meeting

Didn’t like it

Didn’t like it

 

 

8

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Given that you liked the first meeting -> the chances you’d think it’s a great

Hevruta

are now 0.67

You can also say that one will be 67% certain of his belief that this is a great

Hevruta

Beliefs as distributions of credibilitySlide6

Bayes theorem and beliefs

Let’s say that your opinion regarding the

Hevruta

is a continuous parameter:

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

PriorSlide7

Bayes theorem and beliefs

Let’s say that your opinion regarding the

Hevruta

is a continuous parameter:

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

Prior

LikelihoodSlide8

Bayes theorem and beliefs

Let’s say that your opinion regarding the

Hevruta

is a continuous parameter:

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

Prior

Likelihood

Posterior

The posterior weights the prior and likelihood in accordance with their precisionSlide9

Examples of applications to perceptionSlide10

Examples of applications to perceptionSlide11

Non-Informative priors

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

PriorSlide12

Non-Informative priors

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

Prior

LikelihoodSlide13

Non-Informative priors

Very boring!

That’s great!

-100

100

Prior

Likelihood

PosteriorSlide14

Why go Bayesian?

Modelling:

A coherent mathematical framework for optimal learning, perceptual processes, and modification of beliefs.

Can be useful to find conditions in which people diverge from the optimal predictionsSlide15

Bullock, J. G. (2007)Slide16

Why go Bayesian?

Modelling:

A coherent mathematical framework for optimal learning, perceptual processes, and modification of beliefs.

Can be useful to find conditions in which people diverge from the optimal predictions

Statistics:

Many problems with null hypothesis significance testing

(e.g. multiple comparisons, interpretation of p-values, etc.)

A coherent framework for study replication and accumulation of evidence –

“today’s posterior is tomorrow’s prior”

A much more flexible framework of data analysis (e.g.

almost no assumptions are required)

Very suitable for hierarchical statistical modellingSlide17

Data analysis example

We want to say something about the height of a population.

We have the following sample:Slide18

Data analysis example

The first question is -

what is the data generating process?

.

We assume a normal process so that:

(data variance is assumed to be known for simplicity)

 Slide19

Data analysis example

The second question is

what kind of prior do we want to assume

Slide20

Data analysis example

For a

weakly informative prior

we can choose a prior that represents

what we know about heights in general, but allows for high variation. E.g.

 Slide21

Data analysis example

Note that the green curve represents a distribution representing the credibility of different

. It is not the data distribution

.

The posterior mean is 192.11, while the sample mean is 192.31, Thus, the posterior seems to correspond well with the sample

 Slide22

How does it actually happen?

Kruschke

, 2015Slide23

How does it actually happen?

For each value of

- its probability given the data is calculated

E.g.

For

,

and

(log likelihood = -348)

For

,

and

(log likelihood = -144)

Finally, each value of

to create a probability distribution (summing up to 1)

 Slide24

The product of Bayesian data analysis

In its core, Bayesian data analysis

does not lead to a yes/no conclusion regarding parameters of interest.

Rather it provides a belief probability distribution, which In most cases can be used to conclude on

what is the most likely state of the parameter, and how uncertain this state is.

Bayesian model comparison

(i.e. Bayes factors), is a more familiar approach to compare the relative probability of two models. Although often thought of as a dichotomous decision process, it is not.

It only says how much more likely is model A in comparison to model B.

Slide25

Some good recent books on Bayesian modelling

Kruschke

, J. (2014). 

Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan

. Academic Press.

A very comprehensive hands-on introductory book to Bayesian data analysisSlide26

Some good recent books on Bayesian modelling

Lee &

Wagenmakers

(2013). Bayesian cognitive modelling

A good introductory book into Bayesian modelling.Slide27

Some good recent books on Bayesian modelling

Gelman

, A., et al. (2013).

Bayesian Data Analysis.

CRC press.

A

more advanced,

mathematically oriented tutorial.