/
Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from Urban Coyotes Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from Urban Coyotes

Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from Urban Coyotes - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
407 views
Uploaded On 2016-09-21

Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from Urban Coyotes - PPT Presentation

in Denver and a WolfSheep System in Idaho NWRC Mission Apply scientific expertise to resolve humanwildlife conflicts while maintaining the quality of the environment shared with wildlife Stewart ID: 469413

coyote coyotes people hazing coyotes coyote hazing people urban study est aggressive lethal conflict treatment denver human wildlife behavior

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Being Better at Prevention: Lessons from Urban Coyotes in Denver and a Wolf-Sheep System in Idaho

NWRC MissionApply scientific expertise to resolve human-wildlife conflicts while maintaining the quality of the environment shared with wildlife

Stewart

BreckCarnivore EcologistUSDA-Wildlife ServicesNational Wildlife Research CenterSlide2

My BackgroundSlide3

Conflict on the Rise….Slide4

This Can Be Appropriate

Want To Minimize Limited Experience

Reactive Management of Conflict Slide5

“Carnivore

Conservation is not just about saving rare species, but also prudently managing abundant ones.” David MacdonaldWhat is Prudent?Realistic Win-Win SituationsSlide6
Slide7

Creating Win-Win Scenarios

What is Win-WinFewer Livestock or Pets Killed by PredatorsLess Lethal Control of Predators ArguePrevention is KeyUnderstanding and working with AFFECTED Stakeholders is Critical Slide8

Fences

FladryVisual RepellentsAcoustic Repellents ProjectilesElectric CollarsConditioned Taste AversionChemical RepellentsSterilization

Immuno-contraceptionTranslocationLivestock Guarding Animals

Hazing

Aggregate Grazing

Shepherding

Hotspot Avoidance

Control of Birthing

Night Pens

Disposal of Carcasses

Reducing Garbage

Controlling Pets

Education

Law Enforcement

Fences

Our Non-lethal Tool Box

Managing Predators

Managing the ResourcesSlide9

How Full Is Our Tool Box?

Our Tool Box is Pretty Full.The bigger problem is that we don’t THOUGHTFULLY use them.Slide10

Recommendation #

of ranches Avoid handling/contacting wildlife 122Change class of livestock 22Change feeding schedule 701Change time of breeding 705Eliminate wildlife feeding 1137

Exclusion/fencing 1895Guarding animals 1655Harassment/hazing 1750Legal harvest 341Herding

1111Husbandry 917Penning/Confinement of livestock 717Relocate livestock/change pastures 1330Shed lambing (calving/birthing) 1303

WS recommendations to Stakeholders in Montana 2014Slide11

So Why Aren’t Non-Lethal Tools Used More…Slide12

Denver Metro Area Coyote Study

Study Objectives:

Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Conflict

Human Dimensions

Management Inventory Survey

DMA Coyote Survey

Urban Coyote Ecology

Link movement and activity to conflict patterns

Develop estimate of coyote population in DMA

Evaluate food habits of coyote in DMA

Urban Coyote Behavior

Determine if urban coyotes are bolder/more aggressive than rural coyotes

Quantify coyote tolerance of people

Urban Coyote Management – Can behavior be suitably altered

Test community hazing

Test area exclusion hazing (airport study)

Develop behavioral profileSlide13

Emergence of Urban Coyote Conflict in DenverSlide14

Conflict Reports on Dogs and People

Prediction 7: More Aggressive Behavior Toward Pets and PeopleSlide15

Denver Urban AreaU.S. Census BureauSlide16

Are coyotes in the Denver Metro Area bolder or more aggressive?

Urban Coyotes Eating People

Urban Coyotes Trailing People

Emergence of Aggressive

Behavior Toward PeopleSlide17

Coyote Ecology and Behavior in the Denver Metropolitan AreaSlide18

Capturing Coyotes

April 2012-May 2013Padded foothold traps and snaresTTDsTrap-AlertMeasurements and blood drawGPS Collar and ear tags

Photo Credit:

Jiancarlo

UlloaSlide19

Estimate of Coyote Population Size in Denver

Mean

Lower Est.

Higher Est.

Est. # Packs

111.5

78.7

191.3

Est. Pack Size-Winter

4

2

6

Est. Pack Size-Summer

8.4

5.3

11.6

Est. #

Residents-Winter

446

157

1,148

Est. # Residents-Summer

937

417

2,219

Est. # Transients (15% Adults)

67

24

172

Est. Total Coyotes-Winter

513

181

1,320

Est. Total Coyotes-Summer

1,004

441

2,391Slide20

The Problem: “Wallpaper Effect”

One of the factors leading to human-coyote conflict includes human acceptance of or indifference to coyote presence. (Schmidt 2007)Slide21

Hypothesize Coyotes Developing Aggressive Behavior

Less Aggressive MoreSlide22

Behavioral Thresholds

Coyotes attacking Pets

Coyotes attacking People

Less Aggressive MoreSlide23

Selection Pressures in Urban Areas

Coyotes attacking People

Less Aggressive MoreSlide24

Coyotes have become Bolder and More Aggressive Toward People and Pets in DenverResult of Humans Becoming Less Relevant to Coyotes

Take Home PointsSlide25

QuestionsWhat is Prudent Management of Urban Coyotes?

How Do We Use Non-Lethal Strategies To Reduce Problems Slide26

Hazing to Help People and Coyotes

Using coyote hazing at the community level to change behavior and reduce human-coyote conflict in urban environmentsSlide27

Can we get the public to haze coyotes and does this help?Slide28

Challenges: on the coyote side

Are coyotes too smart for aversive conditioning? Do coyotes figure out who is doing the hazing and who is not?Can hazing have a lasting, community-wide effect? Should it be seen more as a personal safety tool?Slide29

Challenges: on the human side

People hate the word, “Hazing is a pretentious and confusing word to use.”People don’t want to haze or they want someone else to do the hazing for them,

“I am uncomfortable with yelling and clapping my hands out loud in public.” What if not everyone is willing to haze? Hazing impacts are difficult to isolate and measure for research purposes.Slide30

Study Design

Treatment and Control (bias toward treatments)Hazing sitesPre-treatment (Reporting signs)Treatment (Hazing signs)Post-treatment (Reporting signs)

Control SitesPre-treatment (Reporting signs)No signsPost-treatment (Reporting signs)Slide31

Study Methods – Hazing TreatmentSlide32

Study Methods - Hazing Education

Hazing tips on signsAccess to an educational video:“How to Haze a Coyote”

Slide33

Study Results-Coyote Side

No Measureable Affect On Coyote Behavior

At 2 of 3 Treatment Sites, Coyotes Were Lethally Removed within 1 MonthSlide34

Study Results-Human SideSlide35

Study Results-Human SideSlide36

Attitudes, Beliefs, Perceptions

What the hell? This is ABSURD AND CRUEL!!!I am sending a notice to PETA and all local animal rights groups immediately, in hopes that you will CEASE AND DESIST this inhumane experiment.Slide37

Attitudes, Beliefs, Perceptions

The majority of dog owners that I have seen use the park are morons. Countless owners take their dog up to "play" with the coyotes...Can you put up signs encouraging people to haze the stupid dog owners as well?Slide38

Attitudes, Beliefs, Perceptions

Conspiracy TheoryFirst Jefferson County wanted to pave the park over to provide “Children Play Spaces”. Now you want us to harass wildlife. NO. Again, NO.

Leave the park and its environment alone. Next step, impeach this board. Slide39

Take Home From Denver Study

What is Prudent Management of Urban Coyotes?Lethal Removal of Bad ActorsEducation of Public is EssentialHow Do We Use Non-Lethal Strategies To Reduce Problems?Must Implement Before Problems StartLong-term Effort Affected Stakeholders Must be Willing to HelpSlide40

Wolf and Sheep in IdahoWood River Project

Conceived by WSRun by DefendersInvolved 4 Sheep Producers

Sheparding 24/7Modern Non-Lethal ToolsEducationSlide41

Wood River Project in IdahoSlide42
Slide43

After accounting for the number of “Sheep Days” the unprotected area had aSlide44

Wood River ResultsReduced sheep losses to wolves

No wolves were killed in protected areaInitially the effort was very intenseOver time producers figured things outHaving the producers willing to participate was hugeHaving an NGO willing to fund effort was hugeSlide45

ConclusionsGoal is To Reduce Lethal Control

Sue and Be Divisive ORWork Together and Help Affected StakeholdersWS can be better at catalyzing these effortsNGO’s can assist with energy and fundingAffected Stakeholders must embrace effortsCan we create Long-term incentives?