/
SEEA CF Implementation and extensions: SEEA CF Implementation and extensions:

SEEA CF Implementation and extensions: - PowerPoint Presentation

sherrill-nordquist
sherrill-nordquist . @sherrill-nordquist
Follow
354 views
Uploaded On 2018-12-16

SEEA CF Implementation and extensions: - PPT Presentation

Completing the links between UNFCCC reporting and SEEA AFF Air Emission Accounts A tier 1 exercise by Giusy Vetrella Aldo Femia Istat and Francesco Tubiello FAO London Group on Environmental ID: 742242

emissions manure allocated activities manure emissions activities allocated left seea aff isic crop row results lulucf products air reporting

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "SEEA CF Implementation and extensions:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

SEEA CF Implementation and extensions:

Completing the links between UNFCCC reporting and SEEA AFF Air Emission Accounts. A “tier 1” exercise.

by Giusy Vetrella, Aldo Femia (Istat) and Francesco Tubiello (FAO)

London

Group on

Environmental

Accounting

XXXIII meeting

San

Josè

de Costa Rica

17-20

October

2017Slide2

The SEEA-CF

AEA

only

by

substanceSlide3

UNFCCC reporting for Annex 1 Countries, compilation of SEEA CF

AEA, and our exercise

Air Emission Inventories

Auxiliary

information (e.g. PEFA)

Air

Emissions

by ISIC

Common Reporting Format

Air

Emissions

by ISIC

and

product

,

detailed for ISIC A activities/products

Usually

limited to Non-LULUCF!

Includes LULUCF!

Includes LULUCF!

Applications

at

higher tiers would go directly to the sources

Has

serious

consequences

for IOA and LCA!Slide4

Results

: Totals, part 1

SF:

Syntetic

Fertilizers

MAS:

Manure

Applied to SoilBB:

Burning BiomassCRLS: Crop Residues

left on soilsMLP:

Manure left on PastureEF: Enteric

Fermentation

MM: Manure Management

RC: Rice CultivationCDOS: Cultivation of Drained Organic SoilsOCGA: Other Cropland and Grassland

ActivitiesFCAg Fuel

Combustion (in

Agriculture)FLM: Forest Land ManagementFCFo: Fuel Combustion (in Forestry)FCFi: Fuel Combustion (in Fishing)OFi: Other (in Fishing)Slide5

Results:Totals

, part

2Slide6

Results

: IPCC’s Agriculture

by product/asset

(

Continued

)

CRLS:

Crop

Residues

left

on

soils

MLP:

Manure left on PastureCDOS: Cultivation of Drained Organic SoilsOCGA: Other

Cropland and Grassland ActivitiesSlide7

Results

: IPCC’s LULUCF

(

Continued

)Slide8

Questions

Of two kinds:Concerning

the correct identification of the connections with products and the proposed allocation to economic activities;Concerning the possibility of generalizing (in particular, to non-Annex 1 Countries) this kind of workSlide9

Type

1 questions: some examples

Emissions from Wildfires allocated to “Other ISIC and Households”;Crop residues left on soil allocated to

Environmental

Assets relevant for AFF activities

row, because they provide

a fertilisation service to the following years’ production

. However, they are due to current crop production (crops row) and

emit this year…Emissions from manure

management allocated to the “manure” product (“other products” row). However, manure is connected to

livestocks and animal production…Emissions from Manure

left on Pasture allocated to Environmental Assets

relevant for AFF activities row (

grassland). However

…Emissions from Manure Applied

to Soil allocated to Crops Primary row…Emissions from “Harvested wood products”, provisionally allocated “

Other ISIC and Households”, as we considered them deriving from the use of these products, which mainly occurs outside AFF activities. Is this correct?

Other borderline cases surely present!Slide10

Type

2 questions

Annex-1 countries UNFCCC reporting tool (CRF) is complete and detailed. Can a mapping with other (IPCC-compliant) estimates be established, even if the latter have lower levels of detail?Is the level

of detail

of the

CRF

high

enough for establishing the most important correspondences

with economic activities and products or is there a big need for pro-quota

allocation?Can the connections proposed in this paper be the basis for a set of guidelines for the transformation of UNFCCC communication data into table 4.5 of the SEEA AFF?

Which adaptations are required to allow exploitation of existing national and international databases?