/
Baseline characteristics of a prospective natural history study of sporadic inclusion Baseline characteristics of a prospective natural history study of sporadic inclusion

Baseline characteristics of a prospective natural history study of sporadic inclusion - PowerPoint Presentation

singh
singh . @singh
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2021-01-27

Baseline characteristics of a prospective natural history study of sporadic inclusion - PPT Presentation

PM Machado 1 P Houston 2 C Sinclair 1 J Thornton 1 T Yousry 1 A Genge 3 I Scholten 2 L Lowes 4 D Laurent 5 DA Papanicolaou ID: 830250

sifa sibm mri patients sibm sifa patients mri total assessment study score difficulty physical muscle novartis correlation 100 inclusion

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Baseline characteristics of a prospectiv..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Baseline characteristics of a prospective natural history study of sporadic inclusion body myositis including MRI assessment

P.M. Machado1, P. Houston2, C. Sinclair1, J. Thornton1, T. Yousry1, A. Genge3, I. Scholten2, L. Lowes4, D. Laurent5, D.A. Papanicolaou6, M.G. Hanna1

Muscle Study Group Scientific Annual MeetingSeptember 24-26, 2016 at Snowbird, UT

1

Medical Research Council Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London Institute of Neurology, London, UK;

2

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland;

3

Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada;

4

Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA;

5

Novartis

Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland

;

6

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ,

USA

Slide2

Disclosures

Pedro M. Machado and Michael G. Hanna serve as consultants to Novartis and declare research support from MRC Centre grant award.Linda Lowes serves as a consultant to PTC, Sarepta, and Bristol Meyer Squib. There was no payment from Novartis for participation in this study. Her institution has received grant support for clinical trials from Novartis. John Thornton received research support from MRC Centre grant award. Parul Houston, Ingo Scholten, Didier Laurent, and Dimitris A. Papanicolaou are employees of Novartis and may be eligible for Novartis stock and stock options. Angela Genge was employed with Novartis from January 2014 to July 2014.The data has been

previously presented as a poster at the 2nd Congress of European Academy of Neurology; May 28–31, 2016, Copenhagen, Denmark.2

Slide3

Introduction

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is a rare, debilitating degenerative and inflammatory disorder associated with aging.Characterized by progressive weakness and atrophy of proximal and distal muscles.1,2,3There are limited data that longitudinally characterize the functional impairment, patient burden and economic impact of sIBM.The sIBM Physical Functioning Assessment (sIFA) is a newly developed patient-reported outcome that measures physical function. 11 questions that assess the impact of sIBM on upper and lower extremity function as well as dysphagia.431. Cortese A. et al

. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:404-12; 2.Cox FM, et al. Brain. 2011;134:3167–75; 3. Benveniste O, et al. Brain. 2011;134:3176–84; 4. Williams V, et al. Muscle Nerve. 2016 [Epub ahead of print].

Slide4

Objectives

To characterize the clinical progression and functional impact of sIBM over time, as measured by sIFA.To assess thigh muscle composition using MRI.4MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis; sIFA, sIBM Physical Functioning Assessment

Slide5

Study design and participants

This is a longitudinal, natural history study in patients with sIBM across sites in Canada, Sweden, UK and the US.As of November 30, 2015 (data cut-off date), a total of 184 patients had been recruited. Inclusion criteriapatients aged ≥45 years. diagnosis of sIBM.1,2 patients willing and able to complete the patient questionnaires and the functional assessments. Patients with concurrent diagnosis of any other neurologic or neuromuscular disease that affected the same muscle groups as sIBM were not included in the study.51. Hilton-Jones D,

et al. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010;20:142–7; 2. Rose MR, ENMC IBM Working Group. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013; 23:1044–55.sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis

Slide6

Assessments

The following data were collected at baselinesIFA total score.Quadriceps quantitative muscle testing (QMT).Hand-grip dynamometry.6-minute walking distance (6MWD).Physician assessment of disease severity.Thigh Muscle Volume (TMV) and the corresponding Inter/Intramuscular Adipose Tissue (IMAT) volume was assessed by MRI in a subset of 19 patients.PD- and T1-weighted images, 1.5T Siemens Avanto6sIFA

, sIBM Physical Functioning Assessment

Slide7

Statistical analysis

Correlations were made between the sIFA patient-reported outcome and assessments of mobility/strength (6MWD and quadriceps QMT) in a subset of 137 patients. Correlations between sIFA and objective assessments of muscle composition measured using MRI were analyzed in a subset of 19 patients.A non-parametric Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for the correlation analyses.76MWD, 6-minute walking distance; sIFA, sIBM physical f

unctioning assessment; QMT, quadriceps quantitative muscle testing

Slide8

Demographics and baseline characteristics of the study population

EthnicityCaucasian, n (%)Asian, n (%)Other, n (%)Black, n (%)176 (96.2)3 (1.6)3 (1.6)1 (0.5)Gender, male, n (%)132 (72.1)Age (years), mean (SD)

68.2 (7.9)Time since symptom onset to baseline visit (years), mean (SD)a9.8 (5.7)Time since symptom onset to diagnosis (years), mean (SD)b4.8 (4.6)Ambulatory patients, n (%)172 (94.0)Prior medication prescribed for sIBM, n (%)13 (7.1)Any comorbid conditions, n (%)142 (77.2)Number of comorbid conditions, mean (SD)5.5 (4.0)

Enrolled population, N=184;

cut-off date: November 30, 2015

a

Enrollment

year minus year of first symptoms;

b

Year

of diagnosis minus year of first symptoms

Ambulatory was defined as patients who are not wheelchair bound and the 6-MWD was at least 1 meter (intermittent use of wheelchair or scooter is allowed. However, the patient must not be aided by a person when performing the walk test but may use a gait aid device)

8

6-MWD, 6-minute walking distance; n,

number of patients in population; SD, standard deviation; sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis

Slide9

Disease characteristics

Patients with falls in the month prior to enrollment, n (%)62 (33.9)Fall consequences in the 12 months prior to enrollmentHospitalization, n (%)Fractures, n (%)Healthcare visits, n (%)5 (2.7)10 (5.5)

43 (23.5)Walking aidsInside or around the home, n (%)Outside the home, n (%)70 (38.3)117 (63.9)6-MWD (m), mean (SD)a324.7 (139.9)sIFA total score, mean (SD)b46.2 (23.3)Disease severity assessed by physician

Mild

, n (%)

Moderate

, n (%)

Severe

, n (%)

Very severe

, n (%)

65 (35.5)

88 (48.1)

27 (14.8)

3 (1.6)

a

Data

available for 172 of 184 enrolled patients.

b

Normalized

score ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (highest difficulty).

Cut-off date: November 30, 2015

9

6-MWD, 6-minute walking distance; n,

number of patients in population; SD, standard deviation; sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis

Slide10

Results

10

Association between sIFA total score and physician assessment of severity.Data available for 137 of 184 enrolled patients; Cut-off date: July 31, 2015.sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis; sIFA, sIBM physical functioning assessment

0

20

40

60

80

100

Physician rating of

sIBM

symptoms

sIFA

total score

Severe

Moderate

Mild

No difficulty

Highest difficulty

Countries

UK

US

Canada

Sweden

Slide11

Results

11

Correlation between sIFA total score and 6-MWD.

R=-0.79

0

20

40

60

80

100

Total distance walked (m)

sIFA

total score

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

No difficulty

Highest difficulty

R=Spearman correlation

coefficient

Countries

UK

US

Canada

Sweden

Data

available for

137

of 184 enrolled

patients; Cut-off

date: July 31, 2015

.

6-MWD, 6-minute walking distance;

sIFA

, sIBM physical functioning assessment

Slide12

Results

12

Correlation between sIFA total score and QMT quadriceps.

No difficulty

Highest difficulty

R=Spearman correlation

coefficient

Countries

UK

US

Canada

Sweden

Data

available for

137

of 184 enrolled

patients; Cut-off

date: July 31, 2015

.

6-MWD, 6-minute walking distance;

sIFA

, sIBM physical functioning assessment

R=-0.66

Slide13

Results

13

Correlation between MRI relative IMAT and sIFA total score.Note: MRI correlations with sIFA were available from 19 patients; MRI was performed using a 1.5T Siemens Avanto scanner and a proton-density weighted pulse sequence; Cut-off date: July 31, 2015. IMAT, inter/intramuscular adipose tissue; relative IMAT=IMAT volume x 100/(TMV+IMAT+SAT); MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SAT; subcutaneous adipose tissue; sIFA, sIBM physical functioning assessment

R=0.35

0

20

40

60

80

100

sIFA

total score

Relative IMAT (%)

100

80

60

40

20

0

No difficulty

Highest difficulty

R=Spearman correlation

coefficient

Countries

UK

US

Canada

Sweden

Slide14

Results

14

No difficulty

Highest difficulty

R=Spearman correlation

coefficient

Countries

UK

US

Canada

Sweden

R=-0.63

0

20

40

60

80

100

sIFA

total score

Relative TMV (%)

100

80

60

40

20

0

Note: MRI correlations with

sIFA

were available from 19 patients; MRI was performed using a 1.5T Siemens

Avanto

scanner and a proton-density weighted pulse sequence;

Cut-off date: July 31, 2015.

IMAT, inter/intramuscular adipose tissue; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging

; SAT,

subcutaneous adipose tissue

;

sIFA

, sIBM physical functioning assessment; TMV, thigh muscle volume; relative TMV=TMV x 100/(TMV+IMAT+SAT)

Correlation between MRI relative

TMV

and

sIFA

total score

.

Slide15

Conclusions

Significant functional impairment in patients with sIBM was observed in this study.This study demonstrated significant correlations of sIFA with clinical outcomes as well as objective assessments of muscle composition as assessed by MRI.This study provided data about the validity of MRI muscle composition as an outcome measure in sIBM. Findings from this study will help to determine clinical progression, functional impact, and the disease burden of sIBM over time. 15MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; sIFA, sIBM physical functioning assessment; sIBM, sporadic inclusion body myositis

Slide16

Acknowledgements

Authors sincerely thank the principal investigators and support staff at the all centers of this study, and the patients enrolled in this study.Authors would also like to acknowledge Preetinder Kaur from Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. for medical writing support. 16