DrKholoud AlZain Prof Zamzam Ass Professor and Consultant Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon Nov 2018 Objectives Introduction Difference between Ped amp adult Physis SalterHarris classification ID: 1048543
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Common Pediatric Fractures & Trauma" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
1. Common Pediatric Fractures & TraumaDr.Kholoud Al-ZainProf. ZamzamAss. Professor and Consultant Pediatric Orthopedic SurgeonNov 2018
2. ObjectivesIntroductionDifference between Ped & adult Physis # Salter-Harris classificationIndications of operative treatmentMethods of treatment of Ped # & traumaCommon Ped #:U.L clavicle, humeral supracondylar, distal radius L.L femur shaftExample
3. Pediatric Fractures
4. IntroductionFractures account for ~15% of all injuries in childrenBoys > girlsRate increases with ageType of fractures vary in various age groups (infants, children, adolescents )Mizulta, 1987
5. Difference BetweenA Child & Adult’s Fractures
6. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Growth plate:Perfect remodeling powerInjury of growth plate may cause:Angular deformityOr leg length inequality (L.L.I)
7. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Bone:Increased (collagen:bone) ratioLess brittleDeformation
8. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Cartilage:Difficult X-ray evaluationSize of articular fragment often under-estimated
9. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Periosteum:Metabolically activeMore callus, rapid union, increased remodelingThickness and strengthMay aid reduction
10. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Ligaments:Functionally stronger than bone. Higher proportion of injuries that produce sprains in adults result in fractures in children.
11. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?Age related fracture pattern:Infants diaphyseal #Children metaphyseal #Adolescents epiphyseal
12. Why are Children’s Fractures Different ?PhysiologyBetter blood supply rare delayed and non-union
13. Remodeling
14.
15.
16. Physis Fractures
17. Physis InjuriesAccount for ~25% of all children’s #More in boysMore in upper limbMost heal well rapidly with good remodelingGrowth may be affected
18. Physis Injuries- ClassificationsSalter-Harris
19. Salter-Harris Classification
20. Salter-Harris Classification
21. Physis Injuries- ComplicationsPhyseal bridging < 1% Cause affecting growth (varus, valgus, or even L.L.I)Keep in mind:Small bridges (<10%) may lyse spontaneouslyCentral bridges more likely to lysePeripheral bridges more likely to cause deformity
22. Physis Injuries- ComplicationsTake care with:Avoid injury to physis during fixationMonitor growth over a long period (18-24 m)When suspecting physeal bar do MRI
23. Indications of Operative Treatment
24. General ManagementIndications for surgery Open fracturesSevere soft-tissue injuryFractures with vascular injuryCompartment syndromeMultiple injuriesDisplaced intra articular fractures (Salter-Harris III-IV )Failure of conservative means (irreducible or unstable #’s)Malunion and delayed unionAdolescenceHead injuryNeurological disorder Uncooperative patient
25. Methods of Treatmentof PediatricFractures & Trauma
26. 1) Casting still the commonest
27. 1) Casting still the commonest
28. 1) Casting still the commonest
29. 2) K-wires Most commonly used internal fixation (I.F)Usually used in metaphyseal fractures
30. 3) Intramedullary wires (Elastic nails)
31. 4) Screws
32. 5) Plates specially in multiple trauma
33. 6) I.M.N only in adolescents (>12y)
34. 7) Ex-fix usually in open #
35. Methods of FixationCombination
36. Common Pediatric Fractures
37. Common Pediatric Fractures Upper limb:ClavicleHumeral supracondylarDistal radius Lower Limbs:Femur shaft (diaphysis)
38. Clavicle Fractures
39. Clavicle # - Incidents8-15% of all pediatric #0.5% of normal SVD1.6% of breech deliveries 90% of obstetric #The periosteal sleeve always remains in the anatomic position (remodeling is ensured)
40. Clavicle # - Mechanism InjuryIndirect fall onto an outstretched handDirect:The most common mechanismHas highest incidence of injury to the underlying:N.V &, Pulmonary structuresBirth injury
41. Clavicle # - ExaminationLook EcchymosisFeel:Tender # siteAs a palpable mass along the clavicle (as in displaced #)Crepitus (when lung is compromised)Special tests Must assesse for any:N.V injuryPulmonary injury
42. Clavicle # - Reading XRLocation:(medial, middle, lateral) ⅓ commonest middle ⅓Commonest # site middle/lateral ⅓Open or closed see air on XRDisplacement %Fracture type
43. Clavicle # - TreatmentNewborn (< 28 days):No orthotics Unite in 1w1m – 2y: Figure-of-eight For 2w2 – 12y:Figure-of-eight or sling For 2-4 weeks
44. Clavicle # - Remodeling
45. Clavicle # - Treatment Indications of operative treatment: Open #’s, orNeurovascular compromise
46. Clavicle # - Complications (rare) From the #:MalunionNonunionSecondary from healing:Neurovascular compromisePulmonary injuryIn the wound:Bad healed scarDehiscence Infection
47. Humeral Supracondylar Fractures
48. Supracondylar #- Incidences55-75% of all elbow #M:F 3:2Age 5 - 8 years Left (non-dominant) side most frequently #
49. Supracondylar #- Mechanism of InjuryIndirect:Extension type >95%Direct:Flexion type < 3%
50. Supracondylar #- Clinical EvaluationLook:SwollenS-shaped angulation Pucker sign (dimpling of the skin anteriorly)May have burses Feel:Tender elbowMove:Painful & can’t really move itNeurovascular examination
51. Supracondylar #- Gartland ClassificationType-III Complete displacement (extension type) may be:Posteromedial (75%), orPosterolateral (25%)
52. Supracondylar #- Gartland ClassificationType-III Complete displacement (extension type) may be:Posteromedial (75%), orPosterolateral (25%)
53. Supracondylar #- Gartland Classification
54. Normal XR LinesAnterior Humeral LineHour-glass appearanceFat-pad signRadio-capitellar line
55. Type 1Anterior Humeral LineHour-glass appearanceFat-pad signRadio-capitellar line
56. Type 2
57. Type 3
58. Supracondylar #- TreatmentType-I: Above elbow cast (or splint)For 2-3 weeksType-II:Closed reduction & above elbow casting, orClosed reduction with percutaneous pinning (if: unstable or sever swelling), & above elbow cast (splint)For 4-6 weeksType III:Attempt closed reduction & percutaneous pinningIf fails open reduction & pinning (ORIF)For 4-6 weeksDirect ORIF if open #
59. Supracondylar #- Treatment
60. Supracondylar #- Treatment
61. Supracondylar #- ComplicationsNeurologic injury (7% to 10%):Median and anterior interosseous nerves (most common)Most are neurapraxiasRequiring no treatmentVascular injury (0.5%):Direct injury to the brachial artery, orSecondary to swelling (compartment syndrome)
62. Supracondylar #- ComplicationsLoss of motion (stiffness)Myositis ossificansAngular deformity (cubitus varus)Compartment syndrome
63. Supracondylar #- Flexion Type 3
64. Distal Radial Fractures(Metaphysis)
65. ClassificationDepending on pattern:Torus (buckle) only one cortex is involvedIncomplete (greenstick)Complete
66. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesTorus (buckle) fracture:Are stableImmobilized for pain relief in below elbow cast, 2-3 weeks
67. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesTorus (buckle) fracture:
68. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesTorus (buckle) fracture:
69. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesIncomplete (greenstick):Greater ability to remodel (why ?)Closed reduction and above elbow cast
70. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesIncomplete (greenstick):
71. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture:Closed reduction, then well molded above elbow cast for 6-8 wOr open reduction and fixation (internal or external)
72. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture:Closed reduction, then well molded above elbow cast for 6-8 w
73. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture: (treatment in O.R)
74. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture: (treatment in O.R)
75. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture:Or open reduction and fixation (internal or external)
76. Distal Radius Metaphyseal InjuriesComplete fracture:Indications for ORIF:Irreducible fractureOpen fracture Compartment syndrome
77. Distal Radius Meta. Injuries- ComplicationsMalunionResidual angulation may result in loss of forearm rotationNonunionRareRefractureWith early return to activity (before 6 w)Growth disturbance Overgrowth or undergrowthNeurovascular injuriesWith extreme positions of immobilization
78. Examples ofDistal Radial Fractures
79. Distal Radial FracturesPhyseal Injuries
80. Distal Radial Physeal #- “S.H” Type I
81. Distal Radial Physeal #- “S.H” Type II
82. Distal Radial Physeal #- “S.H” Type III
83. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes I & IIClosed reduction followed by above elbow castWe can accept deformity:50% translationWith no angulation or rotationGrowth arrest can occur in 25% with repeated closed reduction manipulationsOpen reduction is indicated in:Irreducible #Open #
84. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes I & IIClosed reduction,Followed by long arm cast,With the forearm pronated
85. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes IIAPLat
86. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes II
87. Distal Radial Physeal #- Types III
88. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes IIIAnatomic reduction necessary intra-articularORIF with smooth pins or screws
89. Distal Radial Physeal #- TreatmentTypes IV & VRare injuriesNeed ORIF
90. Distal Radial Physeal #- ComplicationsPhyseal arrestShorteningAngular deformityUlnar styloid nonunion Carpal tunnel syndrome
91. Femoral Shaft Fractures
92. Femoral Shaft #1.6% of all pediatric #M > FAge:(2 – 4) years years old Mid-adolescenceAdolescence >90% due to RTA
93. Femoral Shaft #- Mechanism of InjuryDirect trauma:RTA, Fall, or Indirect trauma:Rotational injuryPathologic #:Osteogenesis imperfectaNonossifying fibromaBone cystsTumors
94. Femoral Shaft #- Clinical Evaluation Look:Pain, Swelling of the thigh, Inability to ambulate, and Variable gross deformityCareful O/E of the overlying soft tissues to rule out the possibility of an open fracture (puncture wound)Feel:Tender # siteCareful neurovascular examination is essential
95. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment< 6m:Pavlik HarnessClosed reduction & immediate hip spica castingOr traction 1-2w, then hip spica casting
96. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment6m – 6y:Closed reduction & immediate hip spica casting (>95%)Or traction 1-2w, then hip spica casting
97. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment6 – 12y:Flexible I.M.NBridge PlatingExternal Fixation
98. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment6 – 12y:Flexible IMNBridge PlatingExternal Fixation
99. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment6 – 12y:Flexible IMNBridge PlatingExternal Fixation:Multiple injuriesOpen fractureComminuted #Unstable patient
100. Femoral Shaft #- Treatment12y to skeletal maturity:Intramedullary fixation with either:Flexible nails, or Locked I.M nail
101. Femoral Shaft #- TreatmentOperative Indications:Multiple trauma, including head injuryOpen fractureVascular injuryPathologic fractureUncooperative patient
102. Femoral Shaft #- ComplicationsMalunionRemodeling will not correct rotational deformitiesLeg length discrepancySecondary to shortening or overgrowthMuscle weaknessNonunion (rare)
103. Any Questions?
104. Remember …
105. RememberPediatric fractures have great remodeling potentialsThe importance of growth plates & periosteum in remodelingA good number of cases can be treated conservativelyOperative fixations aids in avoiding complications
106. ObjectivesDifference between adult & pediatric #Growth plate # Salter-Harris classification, treatments, & complicationsMethods of treatment of pediatric # & there indicationsKnow the common pediatric #: mechanism of injury, evaluations (clinical & radiological), treatments, and complications