PDF-TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Author : sophia | Published Date : 2021-09-02

IN THENo 100700398CVDOYE BAKER AND DOYE BAKER LPAppellantsvTHE CITY OF ROBINSONAppelleeFrom the 19th District CourtMcLennanCounty TexasTrial Court No 20063051OPINIONDoye

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "TENTH COURT OF APPEALS" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS: Transcript


IN THENo 100700398CVDOYE BAKER AND DOYE BAKER LPAppellantsvTHE CITY OF ROBINSONAppelleeFrom the 19th District CourtMcLennanCounty TexasTrial Court No 20063051OPINIONDoye Baker and Doye Baker LP f. Please type or print clearly in blue or black ink Note that a compromise will only be considered when it illustrates doubt regarding liability andor it promotes effective tax administration Compromises addressing any of the following will not be con An Introduction. Aristotelian . appeals. Ethos – relies on the credibility of the author. Logos – relies on logic and evidence. Pathos – relies on emotion. Medium – written text, speech, TV, film, art, internet, etc.. Three different ways to prove your point. Logical Appeals. (. logos. )- convincing reasons and the logical evidence that supports those reasons. Facts . Statistics. Expert opinion. Example. Factual anecdote. Ethos, Kairos, Logos, & Pathos. What are the rhetorical appeals?. What are rhetorical appeals?. What is…. ethos?. kairos?. logos?. pathos?. quick write. Think of a time when you were trying to persuade your parents to let you do something new or risky—a request to which they were inclined to say ‘no’ initially. How did you go about persuading them to see things your way? You may describe your speech or write it out in dialogue form, but try to be convincing as possible. Consider carefully what sort of evidence works best with your parents. . Credibility, Emotion, and Logic. Aristotle . The Father of Rhetoric. The Definition of Rhetoric:. the ability to see what is potentially persuasive in every given case-- having a command of language.. Persuasive Writing. How writers and advertisers use your feelings to get you to agree with them.. Emotional Appeals in . Persuasive Writing. Writers and advertisers use many techniques to convince you to agree with them or buy their product. . Chief Justice John Roberts. Male. 62. Catholic. Caucasian. Harvard; DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Anthony Kennedy. Male. 80. Catholic. Caucasian. Harvard; 9. th. Circuit Court of Appeals. Clarence Thomas. Exploring Different Types of Appeals. Emotional (pathos) - appeals to feelings. Ethical (ethos) – appeals to values. Logical (logos) – appeals to reason/logic. Each different rhetorical situation you find yourself in will call for you to use a different balance of these three types of appeals. . Judicial Branch . Laws and Jurisdiction. Some background information . Origin of law. Case law: . Court decisions that inform judicial ruling. Constitution. : outline the structure of the American government (or state). | Memorandum Decision 18A - PC - 1995 | December 20, 2018 Page 1 of 10 MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cit A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLANT Jack Kenney Stacy R. Uliana Bargersville, Indiana A TTORNEYFOR A PPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE MEMORANDUM DECISION Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D) this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicat The test to determine whether material is obscene was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Miller v. California (1973), 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607: Presiding Judge. Jonathan Rike appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, for attempted murder with a gun specification and improperly handling firearms in a motor vehicle. Rike contends that the t

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"TENTH COURT OF APPEALS"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents