PPT-American Government and Politics: Deliberation, Democracy, and Citizenship

Chapter Fourteen The Presidency Chapter Fourteen Learning Objectives Summarize the key developments in the history of the American presidency and describe their importance Describe the organization of the executive branch and how it influences presidential deliberation. Derek Bell. Newcastle University. How are democracy and wellbeing related?. Is subjective wellbeing inherently democratic?. How should we use wellbeing data in a democracy?. Is subjective wellbeing inherently democratic (or undemocratic)?. At first glance, American politics is complicated and complex, but upon further examination, everything that happens in the American political process has a logical and often simple explanation. . Why Do We Have a Government?. Facilitate Reaching the Goals of Deliberation. Goals of Deliberation. Create collective understanding of an issue. Allow people to express their opinions in a safe forum. Uncover the often unheard voices in a discussion. What is the best guarantee that deliberation will have a good outcome?. Aristotle: A Wise Leader. James Madison: A Well-Built System. Walter Lippmann: Expert Knowledge. John Dewey: Active and Informed Citizens. and the . PINet. Project. John Gastil. Dept. of Comm. Arts & Sciences. The Pennsylvania State University . February 24, 2013. Articles on Deliberative Democracy. Number of peer-reviewed articles with search terms in record fields. Terms = (Deliberation OR Deliberative) AND (Civic . Mr. Gutierrez. What is Citizenship?. Citizen. – A member of a community who owe loyalty to a government and, in turn, are entitled to the protection of the government.. Citizenship. – The Rights and Duties of Citizens. . Chapter Nineteen. National Security and Foreign Policy. Chapter Nineteen: Learning Objectives. Sketch the history of foreign policy and its relationship to citizenship. Describe the conflicting traditions of American foreign policy. Leeds, 30 June- 2 July 2010. Participatory Frames in Deliberative Devices: the Ideal-EU . case study. Julien . Talpin. and Laurence Monnoyer-Smith. University. of Compiègne – COSTECH. CDE . Research. Oliver Escobar. University of Edinburgh & What Works Scotland. St Andrews, 21. st. March 2015. Outline. Context: study /practice of participatory & deliberative democracy, governance and co-production. Héctor M. Martínez Ramírez. Department of Political Science. University of Puerto Rico, Río . Piedras. hector.martinez12@upr.edu. University of Michigan - UPR Symposium: Incorporating citizenship and identity to the classroom . Chapter Sixteen. Judiciary. Chapter Sixteen: Learning Objectives. Explain why courts are so influential in the United States. Describe the argument for judicial review, a power not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. What this lecture will do: . Identify challenges to moral deliberation and decision-making. Clarify the difference between deliberation and debate. Illustrate how moral deliberation and ethical accounting can be used to engage ethical problems. Some people have dual citizenship by birth. For others, it is a choice. In the first case, any consequences of the duality come as a part of your birthright. In the second, you must decide if the consequences of seeking Dual Citizenship Services will provide you additional life benefits or only create dual headaches. INVESTIGATORS . Amy Patterson, PhD - . University of the South, USA. Richard Asante, PhD- . Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana. Megan Hershey, PhD. - Whitworth University, USA. Phoebe Kajubi, PhD.