Past Practice and Current Trends Scott Schaire NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Near Earth Network Wallops Station Director Deputy Project Manager Space Communication and Navigation SCaN Network Integration Project ID: 445105
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "CubeSat Communication and Frequency" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
CubeSat Communication and Frequency Past Practice and Current Trends
Scott SchaireNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterNear Earth Network Wallops Station DirectorDeputy Project Manager Space Communication and Navigation (SCaN) Network Integration ProjectContributions from Wayne Powell, Serhat Altunc, Felipe Arroyo, Scott GalbraithMay 2014
GSFC Compact Radiation belt Explorer (CeREs) Principal Investigator Shri Kanekal holds an early version of one of the mission’s solid-state detectors – demonstrates a shift in the paradigm for satellite developmentSlide2
Agenda
History and Trend of CubeSatsCubeSat Communication EvolutionFrequency Licensing ApproachSatellite Communication BandsCubeSat Radios and AntennasGround Stations
Considerations for the FutureMIT’s Micro-sized Microwave Atmospheric Satellite (MicroMAS) demonstrates an increase in science sophistication of CubeSats
2Slide3
History and Trend of CubeSats
CubeSats are in a class of small research spacecraft called picosatellitesOver 100 Cubesats have been launched into space since they were first introduced by California Polytechnic State University and Stanford University in 1999Even though scientists and technologists desire higher data rate communication, CubeSat teams have limited their data transmitted and compromised their science objectives to be compliant with low-cost proven CubeSat radios, antennas, and ground stationsCurrent state of the art ~3 Mbit/sec
Future capability ~100 Mbit/secA 1U CubeSat, 4” Cube weighing about 2 lbs
3Slide4
History and Trend of CubeSats Continued
The NASA CubeSat Launch Initiative has made CubeSat launch slots available on DOD and NASA launchesA 6U CubeSat is the largest satellite today that could be launched for free
The National Science Foundation (NSF), NASA and other government organizations are increasing investment in CubeSat projects
Single CubeSat missions are typically a demonstration for future constellations
4
University of Colorado Boulder and the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics
Miniature
X-ray Solar Spectrometer (MinXSS
) 3U CubeSat recently funded by NASASlide5
National Science Foundation CubeSats
Selected On-Orbit
Missions
Cubesat for Ions, Neutrals, Electrons, MAgnetic fields (CINEMA 1) – UC Berkley, Kyung-Hee U., Imperial College, APL, Inter-American U. of Puerto Rico
Mission complements RBSP
spacecraft.
Launched
9/13/12
Firefly/FireStation – GSFC, Hawk, Siena College
ISS FireStation launched 8/3/13. Firefly launched
11/19/13
Firebird – Montana State, U. of New Hampshire, Aerospace Corporation
Launched 12/5/13. Complements balloon-based
BARREL
Selected In-Work Mission
Composition Variations in the Exosphere, Thermosphere, and Topside Ionosphere (ExoCube) - SSI, Cal Poly, U. of Wisconsin, GSFC, and SRI
Contains Goddard Improved Winds-Ion-Neutral
Composition
Suite
5Slide6
Firefly CubeSat Mission
Firefly, an NSF-funded mission, was developed by Goddard/Doug Rowland, Hawk Institute for Space Sciences, & Sienna College
Mission: Determine linkage between lightning & Terrestrial Gamma-Ray Flashes by combining gamma-ray/electron scintillation detector, VLF receiver, & photometers for first simultaneous measurements of lightning & TGFs from a single platform
Launched on ORS-3, (Minotaur I) from WFF on 11/19. First contact made on 1/6. Spacecraft performing
science
Goddard/WFF ground station team persistently worked through 25 other
elements
Future missions considering low-data rate beacon
6Slide7
Typical CubeSats
7Slide8
Typical CubeSat Schedule
8Slide9
CubeSat Communication Evolution
About ten years ago, when CubeSats began, they were nothing more than simple science experiments, typically consisting of a camera and a low data rate radioGovernment-funded CubeSats using amateur radio frequencies may violate the intent of the amateur radio service and it is a violation of National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA) rules for a government-funded ground station to use amateur radio frequencies to communicate with CubeSatsThe National Science Foundation (NSF) was interested in finding a suitable government frequency band for CubeSats and Utah State worked with L-3 for a UHF CubeSat radio
Currently, there is an effort to design a system using X-band for CubeSat support with more efficient and complex modulation and encoding schemes to address the CubeSat community’s increasing needs
Antares lifts off from
Goddard/Wallops
Flight
Facility (WFF),
with 3 CubeSats onboard in April 2013. NASA CubeSat Launch Initiative began in 2010
9Slide10
Frequency Licensing Approach
Universities and other non-federal US entities continue to use amateur radio frequencies for CubeSats because it is the least expensive and easiest approach for low data rate communicationThe process for coordinating amateur frequency usage requires a relatively simple frequency coordination request form and short lead timeThere are numerous downsides to using amateur and experimental radio frequenciesUS Federal Government CubeSat projects must apply through their funding agency for Spectrum Certification and Frequency Authorization with the NTIA and cannot use non-government processes
GSFC Firefly CubeSat licensed through NTIA
10Slide11
Satellite Communication Bands
As the frequency increases from UHF to Ka-band, the potential for higher data rates also increases and the potential for absorption by the atmosphere increasesToday’s CubeSats mostly operate at UHF and S-bandsCases allowed on special case, non-interference, unprotected, secondary basisFirefly
Downlink: 400.15-401 MHzUplink: 449.75-450.25 MHzUtah State University Dynamic Ionosphere CubeSat Experiment (DICE)
Downlink/Uplink
: 449.75-450.25
MHz
GeneSat
Downlink/Uplink: 2.4 GHz, ~437 MHz
ARC GeneSat CubeSat – 1
st
CubeSat launched in the US – Dec, 2006, from GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility
11Slide12
Satellite Communication Bands Continued
NASA Space Communication and NavigationNear Earth NetworkS, X, Ka Space NetworkS, Ku, KaDeep Space Network
S, X, Ka
Near Earth Network McMurdo Ground Station
12Slide13
CubeSat Radios and Antennas
13Slide14
Wallops UHF CubeSat Groundstation
SpecificationsBeamwidth: 2.9 degreesFrequency Range: 380 to 480 MHzSecondary Frequency Band: X-Band available for future high data rate CubeSat communication
Antenna Main Beam Gain: 35 dBi
Diameter: 18.3 meters (60’)
UHF Radar as a CubeSat Groundstation
1st used with Utah State University Dynamic Ionosphere CubeSat Experiment (DICE)
Interference
Morehead added as a back-up
Cutting-Edge CubeSat communication over a government-licensed UHF frequency allocation that enables high data rates (3.0 Mbit/Sec)
Currently communicating with Firefly spacecraft
Slated for use for MiRaTA, MicroMAS, CeREs, HARP, MinXSS, and many proposed
CubeSats
Wallops UHF on left, S-Band on right
Morehead State University 21 Meter antenna
14Slide15
Near Earth Network Compatibility
11 Meter class dishes yields high gainLink budget shows 12.5 Mbps can be done in low Earth orbit with a 1 Watt output satellite transmitterLASP and Goddard/Wallops Flight Facility have partnered to design a CubeSat X-Band transmitter, S-Band receiver (NEN compatible)MSFC engineers are also advising on the project.
Project funded by NASA Space Technology and Mission Directorate (STMD)
15
Near Earth Network Alaska Satellite Facility 11 Meter class antennasSlide16
NASA Owned and Partnered Network Available to NEN
Station NameLocationAssets and Service TypesNASA Owned or ContractWallops Ground
StationWallops, VA11.28 m X/S-band; 5 m S-band; VHF (2)
NASA
White Sands Complex
White Sands, NM
18 m Ka/S band; VHF
NASA
McMurdo Ground Station
McMurdo Base, Antarctica
10
m X/S band
NASA
Alaska Satellite
Facility
Fairbanks, AK
10 m, 11.28 m and 11 m X/S band
NASA
Launch Communication Systems
Ponce De Leon, FL and Kennedy Space Center,
FL
6.1 m S-band (2)
NASANOAA Fairbanks
Command and Data Acquisition StationGilmore Creek, AK13 m X/S band (3)
Partnered
Kongsberg Satellite ServicesSvalbard, Norway
11m X/S band; 13 m X/S Band (w)ContractSingapore, Malaysia
11 m X/S bandContractTrollSat, Antarctica
7.3 m X/S band
Contract
Swedish Space Corporation
Kiruna, Sweden
13 m X/S band (2)
Contract
Universal Space Network
North Pole, AK
11 m S-band; 5 m S-band, 11
m X/S band; 7.3 m X/S band
Contract
Dongara,
Australia
13 m S-band
Contract
South
Point, HI
13 m S-Band (2)
Contract
SSC/Santiago, Chile
Santiago, Chile
9 m S-band; 7 m S-band Transmit;
12 m S-band Receive
Contract
Council
for Scientific and Industrial Research
Hartebeesthoek,
South Africa
12 m S-band Receive; 6 m S-band Transmit
Contract
German Space Agency
Wilheim, Germany
15 m S-band
Contract
16Slide17
X-Band Considerations
Universities may have a desire to create their own ground networkNEN X-Band ground system is already standardizedStandardization of CubeSat radios and ground networks may reduce frequency authorization time
Standard hardware will streamline compatibility testingDevelopers can focus on end use and maximize science “bang-for-the-buck”
Goddard/Wallops LunarCube with deployable X-band antenna based on University of Colorado/Goddard X/S band CubeSat Radio and Near Earth Network
17Slide18
Future Considerations
TDRSSUse of geosynchronous relay satellite provides greater flexibility in mission planningGlobal communications coverage Low latency
CubeSat Intersatellite LinkSignal must be robust against interference from other satellite exchanges
Increasing Data Rates
Ka band could provide even higher data rates and is compatible with
Near Earth Network
18