PPT-Webinar on Openness

Webinar on Openness in Adoption 4 Working out the Details of Openness through Alternative Dispute Resolution Welcome to Todays Webinar If you havent yet dialed in for the audio please dial in to the teleconference at . Letizia Jaccheri. www.letiziajaccheri.com. Pisa . 26.02.2010. Open. . source. software. author. tools. content. audience. licenses. format. Author – audience (Licenses). Who can use and make copies of a cultural object?. Extraction . Using Terrain . Openness . Josh Page and Dr. Wei Luo, Northern Illinois University, Department of Geography, 2010. Introduction. . In the past, traditional flow direction-based methods for extracting streams from DEM data often . Westminster briefing, London. july. 10, 2013. Mental Health: How To Encourage Openness And Meet Higher Demand For Services?. For references / queries visit . www.edwardpinkney.com. In Fifteen minutes…. Employment Law Webinar Series. SESSION 1 - . Key employment law developments and trends - What's in store for 2013. 28 February 2013. WELCOME. 2. Welcome. You are on mute. A link to a recording of the webinar will be available. Jason VandenBerghe. Creative Director, . Ubisoft. N. ovelty. C. hallenge. S. timulation. H. armony. T. hreat. The. 5. Domains. of. Play. The Point. Game. Design. Decision. Model. The Point. Player. Motivation. Open Government Parternship Summit. Mexico City Workshop – October 2015. Juan . Pablo . Guerrero. guerrero@fiscaltransparency.net. #. FiscalTransparency. Overview. Objectives and features of the workshop. ©. Mikol. via Flickr CC-BY-SA. Context. Openness can contribute to . better research. , . greater impact. , and . value for money. Open, in the broadest sense, can be applied to all types of scholarly outputs and research processes/practices. McCrae, R.R., & . Sutin. , A. R. (2009). Openness to Experience. In M.R. Leary and R.H. Hoyle (Eds.), . Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior . (pp.257 – 273). New York: Guildford. January 2014. What is trust? . …one’s . expectations or beliefs about the likelihood that another’s future actions will . be beneficial. , or at least not detrimental, to one’s . interests.. As . FY18 Appropriations. https. ://. www.fuzemeeting.com/fuze/f2988286/30204806. , or . dial . (201) 479-4595, meeting ID 30204806. .. Closed captioning: . http. ://west.typewell.com/faelapgb. Welcome from Joanne Carter. Kelly Payne & Ann Tschetter. UNL Academic Advising Association Conference. “The Hidden Student”. Spring 2015. Quickly list three words that describe you as an adviser.. Write . down one advising experience that was memorable because of how it made you open up about your own personal experiences?. Marcie . Daniluke. , Mentor Parent Dependency Advocacy Center; . Kate Cleary, Executive Director of Consortium for Children;. Dylan Roy, Staff Attorney Dependency Advocacy Center.. What is . “. Open. Our thanks to Sharon . Roszia. and Carol Bishop for their leadership in the development of this training session.. Before we begin, what adoption issues have arisen in your practice since our last class?. Security Awareness Training, Influence, and Personality Walk into a Bar… Karla Carter | @ rptrpn | karla.carter@bellevue.edu “Social engineering techniques rely on influencing the victim to do something that is against their best interest, but different influence techniques work better on different victims, because everyone has different personalities, strengths and weaknesses. Research has shown a correlation between the five-factor personality measure (“The Big 5”) and cybersecurity behaviors. While it’s impractical to set up personalized security awareness training programs for each individual, it’s possible to create a program that will speak to multiple types of personalities and the influence risks those imply. Come explore ways to help users resist social engineering by designing security awareness training programs that align employees’ risk of influence factors (authority, social proof, scarcity, consistency/commitment, likability, and reciprocation) with their Big 5 personality profiles.”