Technical Committee Plenary July 2011 Vancouver BC 2 UCA OpenSG Summer Meeting Vancouver BC CANADA eh Host BC Hydro Contact David De Yagher July 18 21 2011 3 Agenda ID: 777440
Download The PPT/PDF document "Open Smart Grid (OpenSG)" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Open Smart Grid (OpenSG)Technical Committee Plenary
July 2011, Vancouver, BC
Slide22
UCA
OpenSG
Summer Meeting
Vancouver, BC – CANADA eh!
Host – BC Hydro (Contact David De Yagher)July 18 – 21, 2011
Slide33
Agenda
8:00am – Safety & Welcome (Chris)
8:05am – UCA Chairman’s Report (Erich)
8:10am
–Keynote BC Hydro Deputy CEO and Executive Vice President, Bev Van Ruyven8:30am – Logistics / Announcements (Chris)8:35am – UTC RF study presentation 8:55am – WG and TF plan for the weekSG Communications (15min)SG Conformity (15min)
SG Security (15min)
SG Systems (15min)
SG Simulations (15min)
Q&A
Slide4Welcome & Safety
Welcome & SafetyCPR911Exits & Meeting Point
Slide5UCA Chairman’s ReportErich Gunther
5
Slide6UCAIug
Corporate Supporters
Slide7UCAIug
User
Accounts
By Region
Linear Trend Line
Slide8UCAIug Membership Composition
Slide9UCAIug Budget
Slide10Where the Budget Goes
Projected Expense
Professional Fees
$17,500
Customer Relations
$8,000
Web Presence
$98,200
Marketing
$24,000
Meetings
$315,988
Testing Committee
$90,000
Expansion Plan to Establish Utiliy Forum
$30,000
Daily Operations
$235,930
Bank and Credit Card Fees
$15,400
Total Projected Proposed Budget Expenditures
$835,018
Projected
2011
Income Less Expenditures
$30,382
Balance brought forward from 2010 operations
-$30,000
Projected Balance at end of 2011 operations
$382
Slide11Plug-In at Grid-Interop
Objective: Demonstrate that effort placed on standards and interoperability is now starting to bear fruit - that standards based, end-to-end application interoperability among multiple vendors is
feasible and supported
by the vendor community in a competitive marketplace.Provides a
venue to serve a wide variety of stakeholders by having three Interoperability Zones that focus on Emerging, Evolving, and Mature standards based interoperable products and systems.UCAIug - trusted third party to manage plug-in technically
Closely coordinated with GWAC, NIST/SGIP, EPRI, and others11
Slide12Keynote
BC Hydro Deputy CEO and Executive Vice President Bev Van Ruyven
12
Slide13Announcements
If you are staying at the hotel, the following items are complimentary/discounted:Wireless internet access in meeting and sleeping rooms.
Meeting room SSID=
psavsheratonmeeting/Password=osg2011
Parking: A special rate of $20 per day is extended to conference attendees staying at the hotel. Get your pass at the Front Desk.Presentations will be available on the OpenSG event website after the conference.
Information on the Wednesday night special event is included in your e-Welcome Packet and by Registration Desk. Your ticket will get you on the cruise and serve as your raffle ticket. Grand prize: iPad 2Thank you to our conference special event sponsors:
Slide1414
The Queen of Diamonds
Vancouver Cruises
Plaza of Nations Marina, Dock B
750 Pacific Blvd,Vancouver BC
We’ve chartered 3 coaches for pick up at the Sheraton Wall Centre between 5:45 to 6PM; the buses leave at 6PM for the marina - please do not be late - and a return trip to the hotel is included. Boarding 6:00 – 6:30PMCastoff 6:30
–
Please do not be late
Dinner,
6:30
– 9:30PM
Docking
9:30
Cruise Information
Slide15Smart Meters and RF SafetyKlaus
BIender
July 2011
Utilities Telecom Council
Slide16Why Do We Care about RF Energy?
Health and safety of our workersHealth and safety of the public in general
Compliance with FCC regulations
Compliance with OSHA regulations
Slide1717
Electromagnetic energy (EME) is present just about everywhere – inside office buildings, subways, etc. There is enough energy in the air around to:
receive AM, FM and TV stations
receive a WiFi signal on a laptop
use two way radios for Police, Fire, EMS, etc.
use two way radios for business communications
receive and place cellular and PCS phone calls
Normally, RF energy levels around you are much lower than danger levels, but you need to know how to determine if there is potential danger.
EME is All Around You!
Slide1818
Radiation can be characterized by
wavelength
and/or
frequency
.
Radiation
is the term that pertains to the emission and propagation of electromagnetic energy in the form of waves.
Electromagnetic “Radiation”
Wavelength is the distance between two peaks of the wave, and frequency is the number of times per second a peak occurs.
High Frequency
Low Frequency
Slide1919
In terms of the electromagnetic spectrum, cell phones and smart meters fall between microwave ovens and TV transmitters. Radiation in this frequency range can induce biologically significant heating at high power levels.
Definitions
Slide20Ionizing versus Non-ionizing
Electromagnetic energy at frequencies above UV light is “ionizing”, i.e.
photons have enough energy to tear electrons from their atoms, creating ions. This can cause permanent biological changes to molecular structure of cells.
The primary concern with RF radiation is tissue heating.
Shocks and burns are a concern at the lower RF frequencies.
105
0
10
12
10
14
10
15
10
17
10
20
10
24
ELF fields
Radio Waves
Infrared
Ultra-Violet
X-Rays
Gamma & Cosmic
Rays
Non-ionizing Radiation
Ionizing Radiation
Visible
Light
Frequency,
Hertz
Slide2121
Non-Ionizing Radiation (NIR)
Mechanism of injury
– Tissue heating and burns
The primary concern with RF radiation (EME) is tissue heating
Shocks and burns are a concern at the lower RF frequencies, for example, at an AM tower site
Ionizing Radiation (IR)
Mechanism of injury
– permanent biological
changes to molecular structure
Slide22Ionizing versus Non-ionizing
Effects of non-ionizing radiation are
not cumulative.Because the primary impact of non-ionizing energy is heating, if cells are given the time to return to normal temperature, no long term damage is caused.
Effects of ionizing radiation
are cumulative.Ionizing energy changes the molecular structure of cells without killing them.
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Non-Ionizing Radiation
Ionizing Radiation
Slide23Slide24Occupational/Controlled Levels
Applies to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment AND in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.
Can also include transient exposure for individuals moving through an area as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over exposure by leaving the area or some other appropriate means.
Slide25General Population/Uncontrolled Levels
This level applies to the general public
Lower tier applies to workers unless they are “aware” of their potential.
If energy does not exceed general population level, no warning to the general public is needed.
Slide26RF (EME) Exposure
FCC adopted human RF/EME exposure guidelines for ‘controlled’ and ‘uncontrolled’ environments.47 C.F.R. § 1.1310
OET Bulletin 56:
Questions and Answers About Biological Effects Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
OET Bulletin 65: Evaluating Compliance With FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/
OSHA standards also apply with respect to the employer-employee relationship.General duty clause: 29 U.S.C. § 654(a)(1); 29 C.F.R. §§ 1910.97 (general industry) & § 1910.268 (telecommunications)Hazard communication & employee training26
Slide27Summary of FCC Safety Regulations
FCC is the authority for approving and enforcing RF Safety standards.FCC rules are based on worldwide documented research
Non-thermal effects of
ionizing radiationConsumer concern but no documentable proof of these effects
Research continuesLow power of devices and duty cycle minimize risk
Slide28Industry Research
California Science and Technology Report, January 2011EPRI: Radio-Frequency Exposure Levels from Smart Meters: A Case Study of One Model, February 2011EPRI: An Investigation of Radiofrequency Fields Associated with the Itron Smart Meter, December 2010
FCC Letter to Cindy Sage, August 2010
Slide29Anatomy of a Smart Meter
Digital circuitry to accurately measure consumption.Sensors for tamper, power quality, etc.DisplayLAN radio to talk to the utility
HAN radio to talk to the appliances in the home
ControllerBIG metal box
Slide30Anatomy of a Smart Meter
Each meter must meet standards for safety and proper operation:ANSI C12 .1, 12.10, and 12.20 standards for accuracy and performance
NEMA SG-AMI 1 “Requirements for Smart Meter Upgradeability”
FCC standards for intentional and unintentional radio emissions and safety related to RF exposure,
Parts 1 and 2 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations [47 C.F.R. 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091, 2.1093]. Local technical codes and requirements
Utility specific and customer beneficial business and technical requirements
Slide31Anatomy of a Smart Meter
Duty Cycle: The percentage of time the meter transmits.Factors related to smart meter duty cycle are:
Frequency: Meters are usually read every 15 minutes, so these devices rarely transmit more than 2% of the day.
Message Size: The message sent from the meter contains the consumption information for one or more meters, as well as status information. Transmission generally last less than 1 second.
Slide32RF Safety Standards & Rules
To the FCC, a smart meter is:A computer devices that has calculating capability, hence needs evaluated the same as a computer for unintentional radiation.
A radio receiver device that also needs evaluated for unintentional radiation, the same way a TV or radio receiver is tested.
A radio transmitter device, with at least one, if not more radios, which need evaluated as intentional radiators/
Slide33CA Science and Technology
Slide34CA Science and Technology
Slide35Electric Power Research Institute
Slide36Electric Power Research Institute
Slide37UTC Measurement Projects
UTC partnered with an engineering firm specializing in FCC RF safety compliance to measure levels from a deployed smart grid system. Key results:Maximum levels from a pole mounted data collector were measured at 15.1% of the FCC general population MPE, measured at 1 foot from the device.
Maximum levels from a smart meter were measured at 14.1% of the FCC general population MPE, measured at one foot from the device. At a 1% duty cycle, average levels are less than 1% of the FCC MPE.
Maximum levels from home area network products (Zigbee at 2.4 GHz) were measured at 0.016% of the FCC general population MPE (6172 times below limit), measure 3 ft inside the home closest to the meter.
Slide38Summary
Smart meters are key to the success of the smart gridSmart meters are approved by the FCC for compliance with RF safety guidelinesSmart meters use the same frequencies and power levels as other common household devices, WiFi access points, laptops, RF based media remotes, baby monitors . . . . . .
Smart meters transmit a fraction of the time compared with other devices
When considering RF energy from multiple meters, consider the following . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Slide39Physical Limits . . . . . .
Slide40Don’t forget the Big Metal Box
Smart meters are designed to send data away from the house to a collector, not into the house (for the most part).The metal meter enclosure reflects energy away from the house.
Slide41FinallyEducation play a key role
Continued investigation into non-thermal effects of non-ionizing radian is warrantedNon-RF solutions should be available to address customers with special needs
Slide42In Case it Hertz
Slide43References
Sitesafe, Inc. http://www.sitesafe.com FCC Office of Engineering and Technology (OET)
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/rfsafety/
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)
http://www.ncrponline.org/ Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.ieee.org
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.org Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) http://www.epa.gov/radtown/wireless-tech.htmlNational Institutes of Health (NIH) http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/emf/ International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) http://www.icnirp.org/ World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs304/en/index.html American Cancer Society (ACS) http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_1_3X_Cellular_Phone_Towers.asp?sitearea=PED
European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks
http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_022.pdf
Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey
http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/publications/RFEESurvey/rfemissionsurvey_home.htm
Slide44Contact Info
Klaus Bender, PEUtilities Telecom Council
1129 20
th Street, NW
Suite 350Washington, DC 20036
(202) 833-6803 (Voice)Klaus.Bender@UTC.ORG
Slide45Shaping 2011 OpenSG Strategic Goals
SG Simulations WG
define how edge devices integrate as a closed-loop system
Impact on distribution system and closed loop design constraints for stability
Communications Strategy for Broad Coverage (Dist Sys level)
-SG comms work with UTC/WCAEnterprise Information Management w.r.t. CIM interoperability projects, Data Reference ArchitectureASAP-SG Security Profiles next round, weave into SG Security/SGIP-CSWGIntegrated Demand Response/Advanced Load Control Address edge devices as an integrated systems approach incorporating all edge devices and market interfaces/services
Open
Source repository for test cases and lab artifacts
What does “adoption” mean, of what?
Slide46Future Meeting DatesNovember 14-17,
Austin, Tx, joint with CIM and 61850 meetingsQ1 2012
TBD
Note: These are tentative dates. Please do not plan travel until you receive a registration notice.
Slide47SG Communications
Chair
Don Sturek, PG&E
Task Groups:
SG-NET: Matt Gillmore, Consumers Energy
Network Interoperability: Tom Herbst, Silver Spring Networks Kelly Flowers, DTE
Slide482011 OpenSG WG Specific Objectives
SG Communications
Continue work on SG-NET System Requirements Specification
Create requirements, based on SG-NET System Requirements Specification, around “Last Mile Wireless”
Continue work on Network Interoperability requirements
Align with NIST on PAP 2 and agree to SG-NET responsibilities
Slide49July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
49
SG Communications
CharterIdentify and articulate Smart Grid communications requirements and work with Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and vendor consortiums to realize those requirements.
Engage with the NIST Smart Grid Roadmap activities and address communications related
OpenSG
tasks in the various NIST Priority Action Plans (PAPs).
Slide50July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
50
Progress since South San Francisco
SG-NET
System Requirements Specification V5 complete
Key stats:
19 payload-groupings (
usecases
)
204 payloads
500 payload-parent-sets
7877 requirement rows (including parents and 2 rows flagged for deletion)
Database matches requirements capture from SRS V5
“Last Mile Wireless” project scope and charter agreed
NIST PAP 2 Re-chartering complete and work progressing with SG-NET
“Last Mile Wireless”
Scope and charter agreed to
Aligned work with PAP 2 and SG-NET
Slide51July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
51
Progress since South San Francisco
Network Interoperability
Several calls and the group elected to focus on AMI requirements (based on
OpenHAN
SRS)
However, calls were very lightly attended and there were few volunteers for the work
Need to decide whether there is a quorum for this group
Slide52July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
52
Objectives for This Meeting
SG Communications
“Last Mile Wireless” scope and charter agreement and launch as a new SG-Communications task group
SG-Network (SG-NET)
Continue work on the SG-NET System Requirements Specification
Meet with PAP 2 remotely (Thursday)
Network Interoperability
Discuss whether there are enough volunteers to staff this group
Slide53July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
53
SG Communications Agenda
Monday, PM1 (SG Communications)
Boot Camp
Note: Session is an overview for newcomers
Tuesday, AM1 (SG Communications)
Opening plenary
Tuesday, AM2 (SG Communications)
Close on “Last Mile Wireless” scope and charter
Current status of SG-NET System Requirements Specification (SRS)
Discuss Network
Interop
going forward plan
Slide54July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
54
SG Communications Agenda
Tuesday AM2 SG-Communications
SG-NET, Network
Interop
and other activity overview
Tuesday PM1 (Network Interoperability)
Discuss work plan for the group (assuming we have enough interest from AM2 SG-Communications session)
Tuesday, PM1 (SG-NET joint with SG-Security)
Payload CIA review, Logical Interface Control working session
Tuesday, PM2 (SG-NET)
Vetting of new requirements
Slide55July 2011
Don Sturek, PG&E
Slide
55
SG Communications Agenda
Wednesday, AM1 (Network Interop
/Enterprise/Edge Conformity)
Joint session on conformance requirements
Wednesday, AM1 (SG-NET)
Vetting of additional requirements cont.
Wednesday, AM2 (SG-NET)
Requirement Database working session
Wednesday, PM1 (SG-NET)
SRS working session
Wednesday, PM2 (SG-NET)
SRS working session and AOB
Slide56SG Conformity
Bruce MuschlitzZahra Makoui
July 2011
Slide57July 2011
Bruce Muschlitz
Slide
57
SG Conformity Charter
Certification requirements for SG systemsDevelop Quality Assurance Plan
Explore use of a Product Mark (logo)
Create repository of best practices
Define sustainable conformity programs
Provide coordination between OpenSG and 61850 and CIM testing groups
Explore tester accreditation
Slide58July 2011
Bruce Muschlitz
Slide
58
SG Conformity Overview
ChairBruce Muschlitz, EnerNexVice chair
Zahra
Makoui
, PG&E
Task Groups:
Edge Conformity: Phil Beecher, (co-chair presently
vacent
)
Security Conformity: Bobby Brown, (co-chair presently vacant)
Enterprise Conformity: Mark Ortiz, (co-chair presently vacant)
Mail lists: OPENSG-xxx@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG
SGCONFORMITY
SGCONFORM-EDGE
SGCONFORM-SEC
SGCONFORM-ENT
Slide59July 2011
Bruce Muschlitz
Slide
59
Progress since San Francisco
Created list of testing requirements drawing from other SDOsMainly Edge requirements so farCollaborating with EPRI to establish requirements-based testing activity for Enterprise Conformity
Working with NIST TCC (Testing and Conformance Committee)
End-to-end Enterprise testing efforts have been moved to SGIP TCC
Security Conformity Group progress dormant and working collaboratively with SGIP CSWG instead.
Working with multiple NIST SGIP TCC (Testing and Conformance Committee) working groups to maximize resource allocation
Slide60July 2011
Bruce Muschlitz
Slide
60
Objectives for This Meeting
Enterprise: EPRI Enterprise testing report out, end-to-end testing report Edge: New activity around HAN (and other devices) testing requirements
Security: CSWG collaboration report out
SGTCC IPRM overview and impact to OSG.
Decide how UCAIug Testing Subcommittee can help with IPRM logistics
Discuss ways of collaboration with SGTCC in order not to duplicate efforts
Discuss gaps in ITCAs for various standards mapping to
OpenSG
requirements
Enterprise Conformity
Edge Conformity (ADR, ADE, HAN)
Security Conformity
Roundtable – Requests from the OSG Working groups on conformity needs
Slide61July 2011
Bruce
Muschlitz
Slide
61
SG Conformity AgendaMonday, PM1 - SG Conformity Boot Camp
Tuesday, AM2 - SG Conformity Main meeting
Tuesday, PM2 - Security
Conformity
Wednesday, AM1 - Joint Network
Interop
/ Enterprise / Edge Conformity
Wednesday, AM2 - Joint Enterprise / Edge Conformity
Wednesday, PM1 - Edge Conformity
Wednesday, PM1 – Enterprise Conformity
Wednesday, PM2 – Edge Conformity
Slide62Slide
62
Edge Conformity TG Charter
Develop Certification, Testing and Interoperability Policy and Requirements for ADE, ADR and HAN
July
2011
Phil Beecher
Slide63Edge Conformity TG Overview
Chair
Phil Beecher
Vice-Chair
Vacant
Collaboration:
OpenADE,
OpenADR
, Enterprise Conformity, SGTCC
Slide
63
July
2011
Phil Beecher
Slide64Edge Conformity TG Activity to date
Certification
Process Reference
Manual
Edge and Enterprise Conformity Task Groups collaboration
Companion
document to SGTCC IPRM
Complete –
needs
ratification by Technical
Committee.
Abstract Test Case Documents development
Methodology for
T
est
C
ase
development.
Focus on End to End Test cases, including HAN
Adopted by SGTCC End to End group
✓
Little
progress on OpenADE and
OpenADR
✗
General / Additional Requirements Document
Identifying general customer requirements (additional to communications protocol conformance/interoperability)
Attempt to identify common requirements, e.g. mechanical, environmental, performance etc.
Phil Beecher
Slide
64
July
2011
Slide65Objectives for
July F2F
Meeting
Edge Conformity TG work sessions
Complete General Requirements Document
Decide focus for next 6 months
Joint sessions
Enterprise Conformity
Review SGTCC End to End activity and relationship to OpenSG
OpenADE /
OpenADR
participation?
Enterprise Conformity / Network
Interop
Review Scope of Work
General Requirements Document – considerations for AMI
etc
Slide
65
July 2011
Phil Beecher
Slide66Edge Conformity TG Agenda
Wednesday
,
July 20
th
AM1 Edge/Enterprise/Network
Interop
Review work items and focus
Review General Requirements document
w.r.t
. AMI and Enterprise
AM2
Edge/
Enterprise
Review SGTCC End to End activity and collaboration
Review work items and focus, including OpenADE,
OpenADR
etc
PM1 Edge
– Joint session with OpenADE
OpenADE conformity requirements
PM2 Edge
Review meeting outcomes
Decide activity going forward
July
2011
Slide
66
Phil Beecher
Slide67Slide
67
Edge Conformity TG
Email reflector:
OPENSG-SGCONFORM-EDGE@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG
GotoMeeting information
:
Provided via email to all members of Edge Conformity reflector
Announced on the OpenSG sharepoint in the Edge Conformity calendar
Meeting times:
Meeting minutes and documents:
http://osgug.ucaiug.org/conformity/edge/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx
Meeting
Day
PST
MST
CST
EST
Edge Conformity
Wednesday
10:00 am
11:00 am
noon
1pm
July
2011
Phil Beecher
Slide68Slide
68
Security Conformity TG Charter
To organize key Smart Grid stakeholders to develop and manage the following key deliverables:
Smart Grid Security Certification Process Guideline
Smart Grid Security Assessor Certification Guideline
July
2011
Bobby Brown
Slide69Tuesday, July 13
th
Smart Grid Security Testing Charter Review & Update
Formation of the SG Security Test Council
IEC 62443-2-4 Task Force Update
Other Standards Update
NIST SGIP Update
Slide
69
Bobby Brown
Security Conformity TG Agenda
July
2011
Slide70Slide
70
Email reflector:
OPENSG-SGCONFORM-SEC@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG
GoToMeeting information:
Provided via email to all members of Security Conformity reflector
Meeting minutes and documents:
http://osgug.ucaiug.org/conformity/security/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx
Meeting
Day
PST
MST
CST
EST
Security Conformity
Tuesday
3:30 pm
4:30 pm
5:30 pm
6:30 pm
Bobby Brown
Security Conformity TG Logistics
July 2011
Slide71Slide
71
Enterprise
Conformity TG Charter
Develop Certification, Testing and Interoperability Policy and Requirements for
AMI Enterprise
July
2011
Mark Ortiz
Slide72Enterprise
Conformity TG Overview
Chair
Mark Ortiz
Vice-Chair
John
Simmins
Collaboration:
Edge Conformity, SGTCC
Slide
72
July
2011
Mark Ortiz
Slide73Enterprise Conformity TG Activity to date
Certification
Process Reference
Manual
Edge and Enterprise Conformity Task Groups collaboration
Companion
document to SGTCC IPRM
IEC 61968
Test Case Documents
Development
Methodology for
T
est
C
ase
development.
Focus on Meter Reading and Control
General / Additional Requirements Document
Identifying general customer requirements (additional to communications protocol conformance/interoperability)
Mark Ortiz
Slide
73
July
2011
Slide74Objectives for
July F2F
Meeting
Joint
sessions
Enterprise Conformity
Review SGTCC End to End activity and relationship to
OpenSG
Potential use cases for End to End
Enterprise
Conformity TG work
session
Review
61968 Test Case Development work
SGTCC End to End activity
Decide focus for next 6 months
Slide
74
July 2011
Mark Ortiz
Slide75Enterprise Conformity
TG Agenda
Wednesday
,
July 20
th
AM1 Edge/Enterprise/Network
Interop
Review work items and focus
Review General Requirements document
w.r.t
. AMI and Enterprise
PM1 Enterprise Conformity
61968 Test Case Development review and decide activity going forward
Review End to End
SGIP TCC conformity requirements
July
2011
Slide
75
Mark Ortiz
Slide76Slide
76
Enterprise
Conformity TG
Email reflector:
OPENSG-SGCONFORM-ENT@SMARTGRIDLISTSERV.ORG
GotoMeeting
information
:
Provided via email to all members of
Enterprise Conformity
reflector
Announced on the
OpenSG
sharepoint
in the
Enterprise Conformity
calendar
Meeting times:
Meeting minutes and documents:
http://
osgug.ucaiug.org/conformity/ent/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx
Meeting
Day
PST
MST
CST
EST
Ent
Conformity
Tuesday
10:00 am
11:00 am
noon
1:00 pm
July
2011
Mark Ortiz
Slide77Darren Highfill, SCE
Slide
77
SG Security Overview
Chair
Darren Highfill, SCEVice Chair
Bobby Brown,
EnerNex
Secretary
Nick Gerbino, Dominion
Slide78SG Security WG – Task Forces
Usability Analysis Task Force
Evaluation and refinement of Security Profiles and other materials considered for ratification by the SG Security WG
Chair: John Lilley (SDG&E), Vice-Chair: Daniel Thanos (GE)
CyberSec
-Interop Task ForceSpinoff from DOE National SCADA Test Bed Lemnos Interoperable Security ProjectDevelopment of interoperable security configuration profilesChair: Dave Teumim (Teumim Technical), Vice-Chair: John Stewart (TVA)AMI-SEC Task
Force
(Idle) Activities taking place in NIST CSWG AMI Security Subgroup
Chair: Darren Highfill (SCE), Vice-Chair: Bobby Brown (EnerNex)
Embedded Systems Security Task
Force
Security requirements for embedded components and devices used in utility field systems
Chair: Mark Ward (PG&E), Vice-Chair:
Rohit Khera
(S&C Electric)
Slide79Progress since San Francisco
Usability Analysis Task Force
Ratification of
Third Party Data Access Security Profile2
nd Review of Distribution Management Security Profile
Receipt of Wide-Area Monitoring, Protection, & Control Security ProfileCyberSec Interop Task ForceLemnos Interoperability demo at EPRI in Knoxville, Aug. 9-11IPSec, SSH, and LDAP Interoperable Configuration ProfilesSYSLOG ICP in the works, encountering challengesEmbedded Systems Security Task ForceRe-organization and re-instantiationLeadership positionsDevice Security Management teamDevice Security team
Working
on Secure Device Profile for Embedded
Systems
OpenADR
Support
X-talk listserv established, need more participation/support
Direction and tasks set, use cases in development
Slide80Slide
80
Objectives for November F2F Meeting
Support relationships with other OpenSG working groups and task forces
SG Network
OpenADRReview interim work done by TFsSecurity Profiles: Distribution Management and WAMPACInteroperable Configuration ProfilesDevice Profiles for Embedded SecurityASAP-SGReview security profile development process and usage
Darren Highfill, SCE
Slide81Slide
81
SG Security Agenda
Darren Highfill, SCE
Day
Timeslot
Subject
Group
Monday
1500-1700
SG Security Boot Camp
SG Sec WG
Tuesday
0800-1000
Opening Plenary
OpenSG
1030-1200
Agenda & Status
Updates
Testing & Certification Support
ASAP-SG
Process Review & Update
SG Sec WG
1300-1500
SG
Security
/ SG
Network
Joint Session
Wednesday
0800-1000
SG Security /
OpenADR
*
Embedded Systems Security TF
Joint Session
SG
Sec WG
1030-1200
Embedded
Systems Security TF (continued)
SG Sec WG
1300-1500
Usability
Analysis TF
SG Sec WG
1530-1730
Cyber
Sec
-Interop /
Lemnos
Topic: Vulnerability
Disclosure
Planning
& Prioritization
SG Sec WG
*
SGSec-OpenADR
joint session will be held in Junior Ballroom D
Slide82SG Systems WG
EIM (new) – Greg RobinsonADE – Dave Mollerstuen or Steven van AusdallADR – Albert Chiu or Ed KochHAN – Erich Gunther
Slide83SG-Systems WG Charter
SG-Systems WG:The SG-Systems Working Group defines
requirements, policies, and services
, based on utility industry standards
such as the Common Information Model (CIM), required for information exchange from and to utility enterprise back office systems and between these back office systems and data acquisition and control servers (e.g., MDMS, AMI Head Ends, SCADA, OMS, GIS, CIS, work management, etc.). Task forces
are established on an as needed basis to accomplish these goals for specific functional areas. In addition to work performed by their ‘vertical team,’ Task Force Chairs act as matrix managers to ensure their functional requirements are met through the ‘horizontal teams’ supporting them.‘Horizontal Teams’ are ongoing, providing consistent artifacts for each increment of functionality that is requested of them by the functional (vertical) teams.
Slide84SG-Systems WG Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, 10:30-12:00Welcome & introductionsResults/comments/concerns from boot camp
“Inquiring minds want to know…”
NIST, SEP 2.0, SAE/PEV, IEC, Unite, etc.OpenHAN
– the next generation (Erich)SG-Systems Roadmap review and update for each task force OpenADR, OpenADE
, OpenHAN, AMI-Ent, EIMGeneral discussion, questions and answers
Slide85Slide
85
Enterprise Information Management Task Force (EIM TF)
Charter
Identify and articulate common EIM requirements:
Use casesRequirements SpecificationWork with other OpenSG groups, particularly OpenHAN, OpenADE, OpenADR and AMI-Ent, to establish requirements.Develop common EIM Framework that satisfies requirements, taking advantage of other relevant industry work as appropriate (e.g., vision, governance, processes, etc.)
Collaborate to build an OpenSG generic semantic model and/or
reference model to be used as members as a starting point for their enterprises.
Leverages standards specified in the NIST Smart Grid Roadmap
Provide a forum for exchanging information so that all members can benefit from lessons learned.
Collaborate with Standards Development Organizations (SDOs), NIST SGIP, and/or consortiums so that needed advancements are accomplished in the most appropriate organizations in the most efficient manner.
Slide86EIM TF – Tuesday Meetings
1.00 – 3:00PM: Session 1
Welcome
& introductions Status & Plans
Discuss NIST SGIP SGAC (Smart Grid Architecture Committee) Semantic Efforts & How We Should CollaborateBrief overview of SCE/IBM/CISCO Smart Grid Reference
ArchitectureIssues & General Discussion 3:30 – 5:30PM: Session 2EIM Utility Case Studies (“Birds of a Feather”) - Set 1SCE, Sempra, Oncor, PG&EReview definitions of proposed EIM Use Cases Actors from Actors Team and update as necessary Brainstorm EIM Use Cases Names and prioritize them
86
Slide87EIM TF – Wednesday Meetings
8:00-10:00AM: Session 3EIM Utility Case Studies (“Birds of a Feather”)
-
Set 2AEP, Duke
Select subset of Use Cases for sessions from session 2Begin Group Development of EIM Use Cases
White board sessions to articulate generic use cases10:30AM-12:00PM: Session 4Continue Group Development of EIM Use CasesWhite board sessions to articulate generic use cases 3:30 – 5:30PM: Session 5Smart Grid Semantic Model (SGSM) Scope Discussion Organize outline for SGSM deliverable
87
Slide88EIM TF – Thursday Meetings
8:00 – 10:00AM: Session 6Discuss findings of TOGAF 9.0 Team
Requirements Specification Review
10:30AM – 12:00PM: Session 7
Complete Group Work on R
equirements SpecificationReview Master Plan and PhasesPlan Work to be Accomplished Before Next OpenSG F2FMilestones, schedules & action items for task force and teams88
Slide89SG Systems – OpenADE
Dave Mollerstuen, Chair
Steve Van Ausdall, Co-Chair
Slide90OpenADE Overview
OpenADE TF
Slide
90
Charter: The Open Automated Data Exchange (OpenADE) Task Force within the UCAIug Open Smart Grid Subcommittee is responsible for developing requirements, use cases, and reference definitions that allows a consumer to grant a third party access to their electric data and, in accordance with that authorization, the utility to deliver the consumer data to the third party using a standard interoperable machine-to-machine interface.
Chair: Dave Mollerstuen, Tendril Networks: dmollerstuen@tendrilinc.comCo-chair: Steve Van Ausdall, Xtensible Solutions:
svanausdall@xtensible.net
Participants
Utilities
Vendors
Regulators
Consumer Advocates
Meetings: Weekly webconference working meetings: Thursday 10a PT / 1p ET
Mailing List: OpenADE list at <http://www.smartgridlistserv.org>
Slide91OpenADE TF
Slide
91
Progress since South San Francisco (March 2011)
Primary focus on NAESB Energy Services Provider Interface (ESPI), aka “standardization” of OpenADE 1.0; ESPI now in public comment phase, ahead of approval by NAESB BOD (expected: 09/2011)
Initial discussions, artifacts around testing / conformance for NAESB ESPI
Monthly OpenADE webconferences, focused on continuity and ongoing work in related domains (PAP10, NAESB ESPI, others)
Slide92OpenADE TF
Slide
92
Objectives for July F2F Meeting
Refine priorities / plan for next four months (through Fall 2011 OpenSG F2F) and next twelve months
Solid plan around ESPI testing / conformance / certificationOpenSG as ITCATest PlanESPI Sample Implementation
Ongoing discussion of OpenADE 2.0 scope
“Evangelize” NAESB ESPI work, Grid-
Interop
2011 Plug-In
Slide93OpenADE TF
Slide
93
OpenADE TF Agenda
Day
DateTimeTopicTuesdayJuly 19th
3:30p to 5:30p
Introduction, Review of OpenADE
NAESB ESPI Overview
OpenADE Roadmap (four month, twelve month)
OpenADE
2.0: Scope, Business and User Requirements
Wednesday
July 20th
1:00p to 3:00p
OpenSG / OpenADE as Interoperability Testing and Conformance Authority (ITCA) for OpenADE / NAESB ESPI
NAESB ESPI sample implementation
Slide94SG Systems - OpenADR
Albert Chiu
Slide95Slide
95
OpenADR
Charter
Identify and articulate DR signals requirements (based on LBNL OpenADR 1.0 specification) and work with Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and vendor consortiums to realize those requirements.
Engage with the NIST Smart Grid Roadmap activities and address communications related OpenSG tasks in the various NIST Priority Action Plans (PAP09, etc.).OpenADR focuses on DR from an application point of view and specifically on the interactions between the system operator (Utility or ISO) and the DR participant (aggregator, Facility, etc) Work closely with horizontal OpenSG groups. Some overlap with OpenHAN (facility side) and AMI Ent (Utility head end side).
Develop requirements and harmonize with CIM efforts.
Slide96Slide
96
OpenADR Organization
Chair
Albert Chiu, PG&E
Vice chairEd Koch, AkuacomTask Groups:Use Case TeamIncrementally build up a set of generic use cases that are expressed in similar format for the scope of AMI-Enterprise.
Ralph Martinez (ralph.martinez@baesystems.com), chair
Kay Stefferud (kay.stefferud@lmco.com), co- chair
System Requirement Specification (SRS) Team
Generate System Requirements Specification
Joe Zhou (jzhou@xtensible.net), chair
Services Definition Team
Define integration requirements and service definitions
Jerry Gray (gerald.gray@cim-ple.com), chair
Shawn Hu (shu@xtensible.net),co chair
Slide97Slide
97
Progress since San Francisco
Created 4 subgroups
EV
Fast DRDER SecurityCollected multiple DR use cases for each areaCompleted draft OpenADR Phase 2 SRS
Slide98Slide
98
Objectives for This Meeting
NIST PAP09 joint meeting
OpenADR TF updates
OASIS updatesDiscuss OASIS EI TC WD 2.0 documentDiscuss PAP 09 deliverableContinue to discuss and edit the draft OpenADR Phase 2 documentPEVFast DRDERSecurity
Slide99Slide
99
OpenADR Agenda
Monday, PM (SG-System)
Boot Camp
Note: Session is an overview for newcomersTuesday July 19th 1:00 – 3:00 OpenADR/PAP093:30 – 5:30 OpenADR/PAP09Wednesday July 20th 8:00 – 9:00 OpenADR joint session with security9:00 - 5:30 OpenADR general session
Slide100100
UCAIug
HAN SRS v2.0
is located on the
OpenHAN
sharepoint: http://osgug.ucaiug.org/sgsystems/openhan/default.aspx Questions????
Slide101SG Simulation WG
Craig Rodine
Slide102Slide
102
SG Simulation Charter
WG Purpose:
facilitate modeling & simulation of modern electric power systems
as they evolve from centralized to more distributed, hybrid architectureswith control schemes based on more integrated, pervasive ICTsWG Goal:develop a framework and req’ts for modeling & simulation tools and platformsBusiness Rationale:financial and operational advantages that modeling and simulation of complex technical systems can deliver to the utility industry
Slide103Slide
103
SG Simulation Organization
Chair
Craig Rodine, EPRI
Vice ChairAaron Snyder, EnernexSecretaryWin Cuthbert & Martin Mak, PG&E“Task Groups”Models and Tools Inventory (now combined)Develop, administer survey on what models & tools are being used
Steffen
Schütte
and Martin
Tröschel
, OFFIS; Jason Taylor, EPRI
Simulation platform architecture
Explore
metamodels
enabling modular, combinable simulation
Craig Rodine, Steffen
Schütte
, et. al.
Slide104Slide
104
Progress since March, 2011
Admin
Charter approved by
OpenSG TC (April, 2011)Sharepoint site establshed (top-level pulldown, archives, etc.)Solid progress on Models & Tools Inventory
Draft survey under review; making distribution lists
Plan is to administer the survey this quarter
High-quality presentations
“The Experimental Power Grid Center”, Ashwin
Kambadkhone
, ICES, Singapore (April 28)
“Distribution Modeling for Integration of PV, PEV, and Storage”, Jason Taylor, EPRI (June 14)
“A domain-specific language for simulation composition”,
Steffen
Schütte
, OFFIS (July 12)
Slide105Slide
105
Objectives for This Meeting
Begin case study effort
Examine PV arrays & inverters as grid “edge” devices
Sketch out models for modular, combinable simulation Device data models and interfaces (a la IEC 61968 CIM)Power and communications system interfaces“Aspects” (metamodel features) required for simulationUnderstand intefaces with distribution system simulatorsGridLAB
-D and
OpenDSS
Others TBD
Map out next deliverable(s) and schedule
Case studies to drive analysis (bottom-up)
System architecture for advanced modular simulation (top-down)
Outline/initial draft of a simulation system requirements specification
Stretch goal: explore co-simulation (power and communications systems)
Should intersect well with OpenSG-PAP2 efforts
Appropriate timing, interactions, etc. TBD
Slide106Slide
106
SimWG
Agenda
Day
DateTimeTopicTuesdayJuly 1910:30am to noon (AM2)
Set agenda
Frame discussion of WG 2011 deliverables
Work on
bottom-up PV case study
Begin to sketch platform architecture
Tuesday
July 19
3:30pm to 5:30pm (PM2)
Continue on platform architecture
Discuss
comms
co-simulation
Push to finalize WG 2011 deliverables (draft)
Slide107107
SIMSWG resources
Sharepoint
:
http://osgug.ucaiug.org/SG_Sim/default.aspx
Listserv:http://www.smartgridlistserv.org/cgi/wa.exe?A0=OPENSG-SIMSWG
Slide108Q&A