Kevin OShea Public Legal Information Association of NL PLIAN Legal Information LineLawyer Referral Service 912 MF Community and School Presentations Publications wwwpubliclegalinfocom ID: 546456
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Assisted Suicide: Legal Questions and An..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Assisted Suicide: Legal Questions and Answers
Kevin O’SheaSlide2
Public Legal Information Association of NL (PLIAN)
Legal Information Line/Lawyer Referral Service (9-12, M-F)
Community and School Presentations
Publications
www.publiclegalinfo.comSlide3
Outline
Where Have We Come From?
- The Criminal Code, The Charter,
Rodriguez
, and
Carter
The Current State of the Law
- Dialogue between Supreme Court and Parliament, and the election campaigns
Examples From Other Countries
- Oregon, the Netherlands, Switzerland
Where Are We Heading?
What happens on February 6, 2016?Slide4
Criminal Code Sections (www.canlii.org)
S. 14: No person is entitled to consent to have death inflicted on him, and such consent does not affect the criminal responsibility of any person by whom death may be inflicted on the person by whom consent is given.
S. 241: Counselling or Aiding Suicide
Everyone who:
a) counsels a person to commit suicide; or
b) aids or abets a person to commit suicide,
whether suicide ensues or not, is indictable of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.Slide5
Other Relevant Criminal Code Sections
S. 222 – HomicideS. 229 – Murder
S. 245 – Administering a Noxious Thing
(administering or causing a person to take poison or any other destructive or noxious thing)Slide6
The Sue Rodriguez Case
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General)
decided in 1993
Woman from B.C. suffering from ALS (aka Lou Gehrig’s Disease)
In 1992, condition deteriorating – life expectancy of 2-14 months
Asked to have a physician assist her to end her life at a time of her choosingSlide7
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Ms. Rodriguez asked the Supreme Court of B.C. to declare s. 241(b) of Criminal Code invalid because it violated sections 7, 12 and 15(1) of the Charter of Rights and FreedomsSlide8
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Passed in 1982 as part of the Constitution Act, 1982
which forms part of the Canadian Constitution along with the
Constitution Act, 1867
Key Sections:
s. 52(1)
: Any law inconsistent with the Constitution (including the Charter) is of no force or effect
s. 7:
the right to life, liberty, and security of the person AND the right not to be deprived of these things except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justiceSlide9
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Important Sections continued:
s. 12
: the right not to be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment
s. 15:
the right to equality of every individual before and under the law and the right to equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination based on several grounds (race, sex, religion, physical disability,
etc
….)Slide10
Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 1
s. 1: All rights in the Charter are guaranteed, subject only to reasonable limits, prescribed by law, that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society (aka there has to be justification to deny Charter rights)Slide11
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General)
First level of case: Supreme Court of B.C. (1 judge)
Trial judge disagreed with Ms. Rodriguez, found no violation of Charter
Second level of case: B.C. Court of Appeal (3 judges)
By a 2-1 vote, the majority agreed with the first judge and rejected Ms. Rodriguez’s appealSlide12
Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney-General) (www.canlii.org)
Last level of Court: Supreme Court of Canada
Decided by 5-4 decision
Majority rejected Ms. Rodriguez’s appeal and said s. 241(b) is still constitutional
Ban on assisted suicide DOES impact Ms. Rodriguez’s right to security of her person, but this is in accordance with principles of fundamental justice
Also violates s. 15 (equality right) but is justified under s. 1 of the CharterSlide13
Supreme Court Decision in Rodriguez
4 judges disagree with majority, including Chief Justice Antonio Lamer and current Chief Justice Beverley
McLachlin
Sue Rodriguez took her own life in 1994, with the assistance of an anonymous physicianSlide14
Case of Gloria Taylor and Kay Carter
Gloria Taylor from B.C. – diagnosed with ALS in 2009
Started claim at B.C. Supreme Court challenging s. 241(b) and s. 14 of the Criminal Code as violating the Charter
Kay Carter – suffered from degenerative spinal stenosis
Assisted by her daughter and son-in-law, Lee Carter and Hollis Johnson, who traveled with her to Switzerland where Ms. Carter took her own life with the assistance of an assisted suicide clinic
Lee Carter and Hollis Johnson joined Ms. Taylor’s case, arguing Kay Carter should have been given assistance to end her life in CanadaSlide15
Carter v. Canada (Attorney-General)
First level: Supreme Court of B.C.
Trial judge found in favour of Ms. Taylor and Ms. Carter
Criminal Code sections violated s. 15 – placed disproportionate burden on people with disabilities not justified by the government under s. 1
Prohibition of assisted suicide ruled unconstitutional
Ms. Taylor passed away before the case was appealed, but did not receive assistance in taking her life
Second Level: B.C. Court of Appeal
Canadian Government appealed decision
2-1 majority allowed the appeal and overturned the earlier decision
Said Trial Judge should have followed Rodriguez case as precedentSlide16
Carter v. Canada – Supreme Court of Canada
Unanimous Supreme Court agreed with Ms. Taylor and Ms. Carter’s family
Prohibition on assisted suicide in s. 241(b) violates s. 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and it cannot be justified
Violated rights to life, liberty, AND security of the person
Supreme Court noted how much has changed since 1993 decision:
New studies on assisted suicide
Other countries have now allowed it (8 jurisdictions between 1993 and 2010)
6 Private Member’s Bills debated (but not passed) in House of CommonsSlide17
What’s Next ?
Supreme Court finds s. 241(b) and s. 14 of the Criminal Code are invalid for certain conditions, meaning it is not criminal for physician-assisted suicide if:
Competent adult
Clearly consenting to the termination of life
With a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including disease, illness, or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition Slide18
What’s Next? Back to Parliament
Supreme Court suspended the application of its ruling for 1 year
Takes effect on February 6, 2016
Why? Gives Parliament a chance to write new law regulating assisted suicideSlide19
Where Are We Now?
Laws banning assisted suicide are still in forceWill change on February 6, 2016, when one of two things will happen:
1) New law passed by Parliament to amend Criminal Code and set up regulations to allows physician-assisted suicide in SOME situations; OR
2) Parliament does nothing, no regulations in place, and as of February 6, 2016 the old laws are of no force and effect to the extent that they apply to competent adults with grievous and irremediable medical conditions clearly consenting to assistance in dyingSlide20
Where Are We Now?
Federal Election CampaignBrief mention in French-language debate last week
Not much other discussion/debate/platforms
Provincial Election Campaign
Assisted Suicide is also a provincial issue
Becomes more a matter of health care regulation
Quebec has passed law to begin physician-assisted suicide in December
No discussion I have seen in NLSlide21
Questions that remain
How will criminal law on assisted suicide be enforced or applied if no new law passed?
How will the competence of a patient seeking assisted suicide be determined?
How do we ensure consent to assisted suicide is given free of pressure or coercion?
Does consent have to be given in the present or can a person provide consent in advance (i.e. through Advance Health Care Directive)Slide22
Questions that remain
What does “irremediable” mean in this context?Does it mean only a terminal condition, with person facing death in a certain period of time?
Does it mean only physical suffering, or could it include mental illness as well?
What does “grievous” and “intolerable suffering” mean as well?
What is the role of doctors? Can a doctor be a conscientious objector to participation in assisted suicide based on personal or religious beliefs?Slide23
Other Countries
Oregon:Death with Dignity Act passed in 1997
Adult with mental capability to make own health care decisions and suffering from a terminal illness can request medication to end their life
Requires assessment by 2 physicians
Places responsibility on doctors to evaluate patient and provide information
If patient believed to be suffering from psychiatric/psychological condition or depression impairing their decisions, cannot be prescribed the medication and may be referred for counsellingSlide24
Other Countries
The Netherlands:Allows physician to assist with suicide under requirements of due care, meaning:
Patient’s request is voluntary and well-considered
Physician believes suffering is lasting and unbearable
Patient believes no other reasonable solution
Second opinion consultation
There is no requirement of terminal illness
Assisted suicide may be requested in advance (euthanasia)
Minors may be allowed to request assisted suicide with parent/guardian consent and involvement (ages 12-18)Slide25
Other Countries
Switzerland:Very broad right to assisted suicide
Has been allowed since 1942
Don’t necessarily need to be a doctor to assist
No euthanasia allowed, but only prescribing drugs to a person to end their life
Do not need to be a Swiss citizen (suicide tourism)
Anyone who for selfish motives incites or assists someone to commit suicide or attempt to commit suicide may be liable to criminal prosecution and jailSlide26
What Can You Do?
Stay Informed – especially as we get closer to February 6, 2016If you are concerned about this issue, contact elected officials and those seeking your vote in Federal Election (October 19) and Provincial Election (November 30)
More questions? Contact PLIAN
info@publiclegalinfo.com
1-888-660-7788