/
Cases Lecture Cases Lecture

Cases Lecture - PowerPoint Presentation

tatiana-dople
tatiana-dople . @tatiana-dople
Follow
357 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-08

Cases Lecture - PPT Presentation

Chase Brady Structure of a case State resolution at the top Can have a framework or definition Two or three contentions Usually subpoints Framework Can be a definition of a tricky word in the resolution to explain it to the judge ID: 247699

evidence terrorism impact state terrorism evidence state impact judge contentions contention arguments subpoint reasons define writes important economic education

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Cases Lecture" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Cases Lecture

Chase BradySlide2

Structure of a case

State resolution at the top

Can have a framework or definition

Two or three contentions

Usually subpointsSlide3

Framework

Can be a definition of a tricky word in the resolution to explain it to the judge

Can be a way for the judge to evaluate the round

Examples:

“Lives are the most important impact in the round because you can’t reverse the loss of a life”

“We define reparations as payments given by the government to benefit African Americans”Slide4

Contention

These are the biggest arguments in a round - overarching themes of your arguments

Every contention has a basic form

Claim

Warrant

ImpactSlide5

Claims

Claims are the statements that define your argument

Example:

“NSA Surveillance increases our national security”Slide6

Warrants

These are the reasons that your statements are true

Example:

“NSA Surveillance allows us to detect terrorism before it occurs and then prevent it”Slide7

impact

Why your argument/claim matters

Example:

Terrorism is the most important impact in the round for three reasons:

Fear stemming from terrorism is can often provide consequences as severe as the terrorism itself. Daniel Simon of The Department of Applied Economics at Cornell University determines that 9/11 resulted in 2,170 traffic accidents due to an increased fear of air travel.

Terrorism carries devastating economic consequences. According to the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, the economic costs of 9/11 approached two trillion dollars.

Terrorism decreases civil liberties. PBS writes that Pearl Harbor resulted in the internment of hundreds of thousands of Japanese-American Citizens and The Center for Research on Globalization writes that 9/11 caused the detention of numerous Muslim civilians.”

Should be quantified if possibleSlide8

Citing Evidence

Typically do not need to state the date of your evidence

Should state the author name (if possible) and should state the institution he/she represents

The evidence you use in your case should be your strongest evidence - most credible sources and authorsSlide9

Subpoint

These are smaller arguments that exist within larger contentions

While contentions are numbers, Subpoints are ordered by letter

For example:

Contention 1: Increasing education

Subpoint A: Baby Bonds

Subpoint B: Education VouchersSlide10

Rhetoric

Should be kept to a minimum if possible

Necessary to clarify ideas and maximize communication to the judge

The more evidence and the less rhetoric, the better